Questions Truthers can't answer

roundhead said:
Demms /Pubs Minor differences.They all feed at the same trough.


Clinton was in office during OKC was he not.

Perhaps our nations foremost authority on explosives and they're effects (Partin)addressed the house saying it wasnt just the truck bomb. With excellent, believable and experienced testimony.It fell on deaf ears.

I assume you will try and belittle his tests, logic , or patriotism. I dont.


OKC was, 9/11 was....Dem/Pub
Click to expand...


Of course you missed that Discovery Channel special on the Oklahoma City bombing. The "expert" who insisted that the bomb delivered by McVeigh and Co. couldn't have brought down the building was proved wrong: proved wrong.

How's the Osama Conundrum coming along? A toughie, huh?
 
Pardalis said:
Galileo, will you secede your claim that there were no fires in WTC 2 after 9:42?
Click to expand...

I read somewhere that there were no visible fires coming out of WTC 2 after about 9:40. Since I didn't have time to check out the claim, I thought I'd post it here to see if anyone could debunk it. Looks like that may have happened on that specific factoid. That's why I come here, you know, I have no interest in converting anyone here, your minds are already made up.

That said, it still clear the fires were diminishing in WTC 2 after 9:40.

I will comment officially on your photos after my photographic experts Jim Fetzer and Ace Baker certify that they aren't fakes.
 
Galileo said:
9/11 wasn't a conspiracy, it was a legal military false-flag operation.
Click to expand...


No, I'm afraid we're still laughing at you. Do try to remember that you are one of the least intelligent people here. Post #84 asks you to identify the vast shadow army that knocks thousands of unwilling accomplices to a mass murder into line. You avoided the question entirely.

We contend that your imaginary conspiracy is a pure fantasy, the product of an ignorant America-hater's imagination. Tell us what prevents thousands of ordinary people who know da twoof from leaking, well, ANYTHING.
 
pomeroo said:
Of course you missed that Discovery Channel special on the Oklahoma City bombing. The "expert" who insisted that the bomb delivered by McVeigh and Co. couldn't have brought down the building was proved wrong: proved wrong.

How's the Osama Conundrum coming along? A toughie, huh?
Click to expand...


No he wasnt proved wrong at all.


On top of that SEVERAL witnesses are on record as saying unexploded charges were taken out of the building.
That isnt even debatable.

There sure isnt anybody from ATF who will argue with my point , as ZERO were at they're desks that morning in the building.

OKC has a much worse stink than even 9/11, and thats saying something.
 
johnny karate said:
How wonderful for you. However, this doesn't answer my question. Please try again:

Why has not a single law enforcement agency, investigative body, or MSM outlet on the planet discerned and/or revealed the Truth behind the events of 9/11?
Click to expand...

The Scholars for 9/11 Truth, the Scholars for 9/11 truth and Justice, the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, and the Pilots for 9/11 Truth, all investigative bodies, have all determined that 9/11 was an inside job.

I also heard a rumor that the city council of Hogg Flats passed a resolution that 9/11 was an inside job.
 
pomeroo said:
Of course you missed that Discovery Channel special on the Oklahoma City bombing. The "expert" who insisted that the bomb delivered by McVeigh and Co. couldn't have brought down the building was proved wrong: proved wrong.

How's the Osama Conundrum coming along? A toughie, huh?
Click to expand...

I'm sorry, this is OFF TOPIC.

:jaw-dropp
 
Galileo said:
I read somewhere that there were no visible fires coming out of WTC 2 after about 9:40. Since I didn't have time to check out the claim, I thought I'd post it here to see if anyone could debunk it. Looks like that may have happened on that specific factoid. That's why I come here, you know, I have no interest in converting anyone here, your minds are already made up.

That said, it still clear the fires were diminishing in WTC 2 after 9:40.

I will comment officially on your photos after my photographic experts Jim Fetzer and Ace Baker certify that they aren't fakes.
Click to expand...


Minor correction: Neither Jim Fetzer nor Ace Baker are "photographic experts," as Baker demonstrated in his disastrous debate with video compositing expert Steven Wright. Fetzer's own "expert," Jack White, was revealed to be a comical buffoon who didn't recognize the term "photogrammetry," although he was presented as an expert on that subject.

How's the Osama Conundrum coming along? Still nothing?
 
Last edited:
Galileo said:
II will comment officially on your photos after my photographic experts Jim Fetzer and Ace Baker certify that they aren't fakes.
Click to expand...

They are taken from the NIST report

http://wtc.nist.gov/oct05NCSTAR1-5index.htm

Now that you conceded that there were fires in WTC 2 after 9:40-42, could you answer my previous question?

Why did they decide to blow up the second tower before the first one that was hit?
 
roundhead said:
No he wasnt proved wrong at all.


On top of that SEVERAL witnesses are on record as saying unexploded charges were taken out of the building.
That isnt even debatable.

There sure isnt anybody from ATF who will argue with my point , as ZERO were at they're desks that morning in the building.

OKC has a much worse stink than even 9/11, and thats saying something.
Click to expand...


Yes, he was proved wrong, i.e., a team of explosives experts replicated the bomb and showed, beyond any doubt, that it had the power to bring down the Murrah building. Whenever you liars claim that something isn't debatable, it means that you've been caught lying again.

Now, let's forget about Timothy McVeigh and move on to the Osama Conundrum.
 
pomeroo said:
No, I'm afraid we're still laughing at you. Do try to remember that you are one of the least intelligent people here. Post #84 asks you to identify the vast shadow army that knocks thousands of unwilling accomplices to a mass murder into line. You avoided the question entirely.

We contend that your imaginary conspiracy is a pure fantasy, the product of an ignorant America-hater's imagination. Tell us what prevents thousands of ordinary people who know da twoof from leaking, well, ANYTHING.
Click to expand...

Not a conspiracy. 9/11 was planned by only three people, Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld. And its not illegal if the president says you can do it.

YOU are the person fantasizing about a gigantic conspiracy. Earth to the Weack, there is no conspiracy.

Mass murder is not illegal either:

"It is forbidden to kill; therefore all murderers are punished unless they kill in large numbers and to the sound of trumpets." Voltaire
http://www.barrettforcongress.us/
 
Pardalis said:
They are taken from the NIST report

http://wtc.nist.gov/oct05NCSTAR1-5index.htm

Now that you conceded that there were fires in WTC 2 after 9:40-42, could you answer my previous question?

Why did they decide to blow up the second tower before the first one that was hit?
Click to expand...

Because the fire was dying out in WTC 2, but not WTC 1. It also could have been random, they may have just flipped a coin.
 
Galileo said:
You hit the nail on the head, no qualified demolition expert has written a paper expalining how the WTC fell down.
Click to expand...

So you also agree that Mr Blanchard's paper is from the highest qualified demolition professional so far?
 
Galileo said:
Not a conspiracy. 9/11 was planned by only three people, Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld. And its not illegal if the president says you can do it.

YOU are the person fantasizing about a gigantic conspiracy. Earth to the Weack, there is no conspiracy.

Mass murder is not illegal either:

"It is forbidden to kill; therefore all murderers are punished unless they kill in large numbers and to the sound of trumpets." Voltaire
http://www.barrettforcongress.us/
Click to expand...


No, 9/11 was planned by Huey, Dewey, and Louie, under the direction of that archfiend, the Rothschild scion Scrooge McDuck.

Listen closely: we rationalists keep asking what constitutes the coercive muscle that enables your super-villains to carry out their oddly counterproductive schemes. So, the Three Stooges get together and decide to trash the American economy in order to elect more Democrats to Congress. WHO performs the job, a rather big job?

WHO KNOCKS THOSE UNWILLING THOUSANDS INTO LINE? WHAT PREVENTS ONE person from spilling the beans?

Shall we run through the math again?


You are, for once, correct: there was no conspiracy.
 
Galileo said:
The Scholars for 9/11 Truth, the Scholars for 9/11 truth and Justice, the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, and the Pilots for 9/11 Truth, all investigative bodies, have all determined that 9/11 was an inside job.
Click to expand...

No, the FBI is an investigative body. Scotland Yard is an investigative body. These, and organizations like them, are institutions that existed long before the events of 9/11 for the sole purpose of investigating.

You rattled off the names of websites that are merely a collection of impotent kooks who share your unsubstantiated delusions. These organizations are hardly investigative bodies. They're hardly even organizations. Next you'll be claiming Prison Planet is a MSM outlet.

Please try again:

Why has not a single law enforcement agency, investigative body, or MSM outlet on the planet discerned and/or revealed the Truth behind the events of 9/11?
 
Last edited:
Galileo said:
The Scholars for 9/11 Truth, the Scholars for 9/11 truth and Justice, the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, and the Pilots for 9/11 Truth, all investigative bodies, have all determined that 9/11 was an inside job.

I also heard a rumor that the city council of Hogg Flats passed a resolution that 9/11 was an inside job.
Click to expand...



You have presented a tiny handful of agenda-driven crackpots and cynical charlatans. They are not "investigative" bodies because they don't "investigate" anything--as you know. Their puerile fabrications, bogus science, and outright falsehoods have been exposed repeatedly.

You are failing very badly, even for you.

You are reaching Kirkmanic levels of stupidity. Are you sure you aren't pulling our legs?
 
Last edited:
pomeroo said:
Yes, he was proved wrong, i.e., a team of explosives experts replicated the bomb and showed, beyond any doubt, that it had the power to bring down the Murrah building. Whenever you liars claim that something isn't debatable, it means that you've been caught lying again.

Now, let's forget about Timothy McVeigh and move on to the Osama Conundrum.
Click to expand...

I've never heard of the Obama Conundrum. What is it?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom