Just Another Saturday At Ground Zero

deep44 said:
Remember, the people in that video only make up a significant portion of the truth movement in the fantasy world you've constructed inside your head.

Here in reality, the truth movement is made up (in part) of almost 1,000 architects, engineers, scientists, professors, government officials, law professionals, etc -- with at least 220 of those holding at least one PhD.
Click to expand...
Dr. Judy Wood one of them isn't she?
 
Seven years later, none of those can come up with a theory of what really happened on 9/11. To propose you are in the majority within your movement can only be done so by defining yourself as 'Not people who believe no planes hit the towers'.

The most high-profile member -Dylan Avery- is one of many who believes Flight 175 did not hit the south tower. Therefore, I wouldn't call these 'no plane' views very fringe.
 
Lennart Hyland said:
Where the hell did she get her Dr. title from?
Click to expand...
Dr. Wood received her

B.S. (Civil Engineering, 1981) (Structural Engineering),
M.S (Engineering Mechanics (Applied Physics), 1983), and
Ph.D. (Materials Engineering Science, 1992) from the Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Blacksburg, Virginia.
Click to expand...
http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/Wood_Bio.html

Believe it or not she is one of the more qualified people in the "movement"
 
Last edited:
Undesired Walrus said:
Seven years later, none of those can come up with a theory of what really happened on 9/11. To propose you are in the majority within your movement can only be done so by defining yourself as 'Not people who believe no planes hit the towers'.
Click to expand...


That's why everyone involved is pushing for a new investigation - the focus of that new investigation would be proposing and/or testing new/old theories. The most important thing to understand right now is what didn't happen.
 
deep44 said:
Remember, the people in that video only make up a significant portion of the truth movement in the fantasy world you've constructed inside your head.

Here in reality, the truth movement is made up (in part) of almost 1,000 architects, engineers, scientists, professors, government officials, law professionals, etc -- with at least 220 of those holding at least one PhD.
Click to expand...

With respect deep44 I feel that this is slightly off topic as it is the events of the people on that video that are under discussion as opposed to the qualifications of the Truth Movement in general.

I am more than happy to discuss the Human Resource status of the Truth Movement in another thread should you wish to start one. As for the 'fantasy world', again with respect, I have no way of verifying the numbers in the Truth Movement and / or their qualifications and this can lead to confusion as to the validity of their opinions. The majority here have asked for verification whilst there are others that believe that the above figure of 1000 could be exaggerated, in the same way as the representatives of the Truth Movement here have tried, on occasion, to belittle the qualifications and standing of members of this forum who hold opposing views to their own.

If the figure of 1000 is accurate, does that mean you concede that the majority of the population of the World does not agree with you at this time?
 
Undesired Walrus said:
Seven years later, none of those can come up with a theory of what really happened on 9/11.
Click to expand...
deep44 said:
That's why everyone involved is pushing for a new investigation - the focus of that new investigation would be proposing and/or testing new/old theories.
Click to expand...


If you apply this thinking consistently, then you should espouse a new investigation into just about everything for which you cannot present a consistent counter-narrative. Thankfully for us, no rational person – let alone credible scientist or historian – will agree with you. Thus you will never have a new investigation.

If you cannot even conceive of how else the attacks could have happened, then you’re never going to get anywhere. I’m glad, incidentally, that this isn’t my problem.
 
deep44 said:
Yes, she is - she holds a PhD. She's 1 out of 220.
Click to expand...
You should bush up on your math; your 9/11 truth religious cult has only 0.00087 percent of all scientist and engineers in the world! This makes your 220 a fringe of false prophets; a good start for a failed religion.

If you just took some time off from not posting evidence and looked for some, you would change your religion. BTW, no one here blindly trust the government. But your failed ideas make you think that people do. You have failed again. You believe in a bunch of people with no evidence and you make up false ideas on your own. Or do you get all your ideas and thoughts from 9/11 truth?
 
beachnut said:
You should bush up on your math; your 9/11 truth religious cult has only 0.00087 percent of all scientist and engineers in the world! This makes your 220 a fringe of false prophets; a good start for a failed religion.
Click to expand...

Yeah, even the ID and UFO communities have way more than that. :p
 
Burrell said:
With respect deep44 I feel that this is slightly off topic as it is the events of the people on that video that are under discussion as opposed to the qualifications of the Truth Movement in general.

I am more than happy to discuss the Human Resource status of the Truth Movement in another thread should you wish to start one. As for the 'fantasy world', again with respect, I have no way of verifying the numbers in the Truth Movement and / or their qualifications and this can lead to confusion as to the validity of their opinions. The majority here have asked for verification whilst there are others that believe that the above figure of 1000 could be exaggerated, in the same way as the representatives of the Truth Movement here have tried, on occasion, to belittle the qualifications and standing of members of this forum who hold opposing views to their own.

If the figure of 1000 is accurate, does that mean you concede that the majority of the population of the World does not agree with you at this time?
Click to expand...


So it's off-topic, yet you wrote a two-paragraph reply to me.

With regard to the list - you have the names, title, and a short bio for every single one of them (and even a picture for most of them). Verify away.
 
Par said:
If you cannot even conceive of how else the attacks could have happened, then you’re never going to get anywhere. I’m glad, incidentally, that this isn’t my problem.
Click to expand...


Almost everyone who currently supports a new investigation believed the US Government's official story at one point in time, myself included.

You, on the other hand, have always believed the US Government's official story.

I'll leave it to you to figure out why the statement quoted above makes absolutely zero sense.
 
DGM said:
How many is structural engineering. You should be proud of her she is one of your most qualified (relevant studies)
Click to expand...


I count two members who hold PhDs in Structural Engineering.

That obviously does not include those with lesser degrees in Structural Engineering (around 15).
 
deep44 said:
Almost everyone who currently supports a new investigation believed the US Government's official story at one point in time, myself included.

You, on the other hand, have always believed the US Government's official story.

I'll leave it to you to figure out why the statement quoted above makes absolutely zero sense.
Click to expand...

Can you provide a link to the government official story for us?
 
DGM said:
The US government has an "official story"? Why didn't any one tell me?
Click to expand...


The "g" in "US government" (when used as a proper noun) isn't supposed to be capitalized? Why didn't anyone tell me?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom