Just Another Saturday At Ground Zero

Remember, the people in that video only make up a significant portion of the truth movement in the fantasy world you've constructed inside your head.

Here in reality, the truth movement is made up (in part) of almost 1,000 architects, engineers, scientists, professors, government officials, law professionals, etc -- with at least 220 of those holding at least one PhD.
Dr. Judy Wood one of them isn't she?
 
Seven years later, none of those can come up with a theory of what really happened on 9/11. To propose you are in the majority within your movement can only be done so by defining yourself as 'Not people who believe no planes hit the towers'.

The most high-profile member -Dylan Avery- is one of many who believes Flight 175 did not hit the south tower. Therefore, I wouldn't call these 'no plane' views very fringe.
 
Where the hell did she get her Dr. title from?
Dr. Wood received her

B.S. (Civil Engineering, 1981) (Structural Engineering),
M.S (Engineering Mechanics (Applied Physics), 1983), and
Ph.D. (Materials Engineering Science, 1992) from the Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Blacksburg, Virginia.
http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/Wood_Bio.html

Believe it or not she is one of the more qualified people in the "movement"
 
Last edited:
Seven years later, none of those can come up with a theory of what really happened on 9/11. To propose you are in the majority within your movement can only be done so by defining yourself as 'Not people who believe no planes hit the towers'.


That's why everyone involved is pushing for a new investigation - the focus of that new investigation would be proposing and/or testing new/old theories. The most important thing to understand right now is what didn't happen.
 
Remember, the people in that video only make up a significant portion of the truth movement in the fantasy world you've constructed inside your head.

Here in reality, the truth movement is made up (in part) of almost 1,000 architects, engineers, scientists, professors, government officials, law professionals, etc -- with at least 220 of those holding at least one PhD.

With respect deep44 I feel that this is slightly off topic as it is the events of the people on that video that are under discussion as opposed to the qualifications of the Truth Movement in general.

I am more than happy to discuss the Human Resource status of the Truth Movement in another thread should you wish to start one. As for the 'fantasy world', again with respect, I have no way of verifying the numbers in the Truth Movement and / or their qualifications and this can lead to confusion as to the validity of their opinions. The majority here have asked for verification whilst there are others that believe that the above figure of 1000 could be exaggerated, in the same way as the representatives of the Truth Movement here have tried, on occasion, to belittle the qualifications and standing of members of this forum who hold opposing views to their own.

If the figure of 1000 is accurate, does that mean you concede that the majority of the population of the World does not agree with you at this time?
 
Seven years later, none of those can come up with a theory of what really happened on 9/11.
That's why everyone involved is pushing for a new investigation - the focus of that new investigation would be proposing and/or testing new/old theories.


If you apply this thinking consistently, then you should espouse a new investigation into just about everything for which you cannot present a consistent counter-narrative. Thankfully for us, no rational person – let alone credible scientist or historian – will agree with you. Thus you will never have a new investigation.

If you cannot even conceive of how else the attacks could have happened, then you’re never going to get anywhere. I’m glad, incidentally, that this isn’t my problem.
 
Yes, she is - she holds a PhD. She's 1 out of 220.
You should bush up on your math; your 9/11 truth religious cult has only 0.00087 percent of all scientist and engineers in the world! This makes your 220 a fringe of false prophets; a good start for a failed religion.

If you just took some time off from not posting evidence and looked for some, you would change your religion. BTW, no one here blindly trust the government. But your failed ideas make you think that people do. You have failed again. You believe in a bunch of people with no evidence and you make up false ideas on your own. Or do you get all your ideas and thoughts from 9/11 truth?
 
You should bush up on your math; your 9/11 truth religious cult has only 0.00087 percent of all scientist and engineers in the world! This makes your 220 a fringe of false prophets; a good start for a failed religion.

Yeah, even the ID and UFO communities have way more than that. :p
 
With respect deep44 I feel that this is slightly off topic as it is the events of the people on that video that are under discussion as opposed to the qualifications of the Truth Movement in general.

I am more than happy to discuss the Human Resource status of the Truth Movement in another thread should you wish to start one. As for the 'fantasy world', again with respect, I have no way of verifying the numbers in the Truth Movement and / or their qualifications and this can lead to confusion as to the validity of their opinions. The majority here have asked for verification whilst there are others that believe that the above figure of 1000 could be exaggerated, in the same way as the representatives of the Truth Movement here have tried, on occasion, to belittle the qualifications and standing of members of this forum who hold opposing views to their own.

If the figure of 1000 is accurate, does that mean you concede that the majority of the population of the World does not agree with you at this time?


So it's off-topic, yet you wrote a two-paragraph reply to me.

With regard to the list - you have the names, title, and a short bio for every single one of them (and even a picture for most of them). Verify away.
 
If you cannot even conceive of how else the attacks could have happened, then you’re never going to get anywhere. I’m glad, incidentally, that this isn’t my problem.


Almost everyone who currently supports a new investigation believed the US Government's official story at one point in time, myself included.

You, on the other hand, have always believed the US Government's official story.

I'll leave it to you to figure out why the statement quoted above makes absolutely zero sense.
 
How many is structural engineering. You should be proud of her she is one of your most qualified (relevant studies)


I count two members who hold PhDs in Structural Engineering.

That obviously does not include those with lesser degrees in Structural Engineering (around 15).
 
Almost everyone who currently supports a new investigation believed the US Government's official story at one point in time, myself included.

You, on the other hand, have always believed the US Government's official story.

I'll leave it to you to figure out why the statement quoted above makes absolutely zero sense.

Can you provide a link to the government official story for us?
 
The US government has an "official story"? Why didn't any one tell me?


The "g" in "US government" (when used as a proper noun) isn't supposed to be capitalized? Why didn't anyone tell me?
 

Back
Top Bottom