Beat them up and then deny that it ever happened.
Hide dead fish in accessible parts of their cars. Put baloney slices (on hot days) cut in the shape of swastikas on the painted tops of their cars. Avoid being noticed.
Beat them up and then deny that it ever happened.
Why would we want to do that?Should we start a "The Dresden Firebombing is a Hoax" topic?
Do you mean Mossad? Evidence of Mossad involvement would be interesting, but at the moment it seems to be purely speculation.
Calling the idea that the Mossad were involved in the Port Arthur Massacre 'speculation' is being kind.
Bryant waltzes in, has a meal, takes out his guns and starts shooting the cafe up. Leaves, still shooting, is seen by a number of witnesses. Steals a car, kills the occupants (takes one hostage, later kills him), heads to a house where a seige takes place - ends when he sets the house (and himself) on fire and runs out the front.
It doesn't get much more open and shut than that.
You just believe the media? Bryant is a left hander, changed hands for the day? The real target was a boat load of Yanks but the boat departure time to the Isle of the Dead was changed. So the back up plan took place, many locals stated "The shooter wasn't Bryant" and their statments were hidden, we have just got axcess to some. You need to snail mail me and I will send you what I can't e-mail Old Bob 236 Bunya Rd North Arm Queensland Australia 4561 It was our little 911. Bryant is a sheltered work shop dummy and he shot so well?
Graduate Poster, re. Bryant. One of the suriving nurses (Wendy Scurr) will be at our house in April. Graham Collier who was shot and said it wasn't Bryant. Put the web site (spread in brackets in earlier post)together and it will tell all. Did you see Bryant pleading guilty? No because he DID NOT HAVE A TRIAL. Howard said it would be to painfull for the people. He was convicted on a inquirery. All his wealth was confiscated by a thieving gov. The shooters name was (not sure of spelling) Ovelbeek Dutch National. When I try to send web site anywhere my computer is blocked,not just this forum, but it will go in bits. Cheers Bob.
Speaking as a Jew with direct connections to the Holocaust (similar to many Jews, I would imagine) it never fails to offend. And I would have difficulty refraining from physical violence too, I concur with you.
I sometimes feel like yelling, "You want proof of the Holocaust? You want proof? IS A LETTER DESCRIBING MY UNCLE'S FINAL MOMENTS PROOF ENOUGH FOR YOU???"
But I'm not going to give them that satisfaction.
OneShot. I take it you're a Protestant. Good. I have a question. I once heard that the Protestants spun off from the Catholics because Protestants are a bunch of money grubbing thick-skinned business men and the Catholic Church wouldn't let them make enough money. Is it true?
(In short, why would you assume any Jew ((or every Jew)) would know answers to questions that are likely more archaelogical or anthropological in their base? Do you know everything about the entire history of your own religion?)
I recently heard for the first time that there is no physical evidence in the world of the Jews ever being enslaved except for in the Bible.
I was wondering if this is true....