Let's ask again: What was the MOTIVE for WTC7?

chillzero said:
Thank you - thats exactly what I was about to point out. I am sure that JHarrow will either demonstrate how this identifies a motive, or will leave the discussion to any of the other threads that discuss Jowenko's opinion.
Click to expand...



I did not mention Jowenko first. I was responding to a post by boloboffin.
 
JHarrow said:
I did not mention Jowenko first. I was responding to a post by boloboffin.
Click to expand...

No, you were using an on-topic post of mine (discussion of a motive with an explanation of how Jowenko fit into that motive alone) to derail the subject.
 
lapman said:
Then lets get back to the OP. What plausible reason would they have to demolish WTC 7 and cover it up?
Click to expand...

A lack of percieved motive does not alter any other evidence. Many criminals are convicted when their motive is unknown.

I have no idea what the motive for 7 was but that does not change the fact it was demolished.
 
boloboffin said:
No, you were using an on-topic post of mine (discussion of a motive with an explanation of how Jowenko fit into that motive alone) to derail the subject.
Click to expand...


No, you sounded incredulous about Jowenko thinking it could be demolished that day and I simply asked why you were so quick to disbelieve this expert.
 
JHarrow said:
Ah, I see you are lying again.

Jowenko still believes it was a controlled demolition and says he has throughly researched the topic himself. He is an expert, you are not.
Click to expand...
He and 9/11 truth are wrong. Seems like he is wrong so his expert opinion is false/wrong/bad. So now you have one wrong expert and no others. How many thousands of CD experts blow this fantasy silent explosives WTC7 CD out of the water, with your own wrong expert saying 1 and 2 were not CD. You got a 66 percent correct expert who never got the full story on the fire and events of 9/11, other than looking at a video and making a mistake. Lack of knowledge is the primary trait of 9/11 truth. Ignorance is the key to being a 9/11 "truth" believer. Demonstrated continuously...
 
Last edited:
JHarrow said:
A lack of percieved motive does not alter any other evidence. Many criminals are convicted when their motive is unknown.

I have no idea what the motive for 7 was but that does not change the fact it was demolished.
Click to expand...

Oh I see, so it is fact now is it?

Its a fact that WTC 7 was demolished even though in the very same sentence you can offer absolutely zero motive for it.

Brilliant, no wonder everybody takes you so seriously.
 
RedIbis said:
I just felt like playing along. I know how you guys love to force someone like me into a position of speculation, the easiest position to attack.
Click to expand...


Maybe some do, but not me. The OP does ask for speculation, of course, if that's all you have. However, I'd much rather see a supported hypothesis, with as little speculation as possible. Unfortunately, getting one of those out of the Truth Movement is like squeezing Barolo out of concrete...
 
stateofgrace said:
Oh I see, so it is fact now is it?

Its a fact that WTC 7 was demolished even though in the very same sentence you can offer absolutely zero motive for it.

Brilliant, no wonder everybody takes you so seriously.
Click to expand...


Yes, just like it is a fact that a guy killed 5 prostitutes but has not revealed his motive.

Not having a motive does not negate the extraordinary circumstances of 7's collapse.
 
Last edited:
JHarrow said:
Yes, just like it is a fact that a guy killed 5 prostitutes but has not revealed his motive.

Not having a motive does not negate the extraordinary circumstances of 7's collapse.
Click to expand...
But a fact is true and provable. Can you do that or do you want to stop using the word 'fact'?
 
JHarrow said:
If you cant be bothered reading the thread i'm not going to repeat it.

Go back and look at why Jowenko was mentioned.
Click to expand...

It wasn't mentioned that he was backing any kind of motive, you made that claim.

So, what is it?
 
RedIbis said:
/Speculation Alert/

IF it was an inside job then WTC 7 could have very well been a command center for the entire Manhattan part of the operation. After all, you have the most powerful and secretive agencies housed in this bldg and you have Ghouliani's OEM. Seems like the perfect spot to organize and plan for the event, and of course, you can't leave that lying around. Over the last few years, why not store highly sensitive files involved in high profile SEC cases with Enron and others, so when the bldg is destroyed so is the evidence for these cases, as well as the entire operation.
Click to expand...

Let us remember that this building was generally referred as "Salomon Brothers" for a reason. That is, that was the most important company there. Not SEC or some intelligence agency.

I seem to recall that there have been quite a few Enron convictions, as well.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom