• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Bigfoot: The Invisible Variety

Correa Neto said:
Why?
Once he gives a name -even if its a screen name- there's a chance "the name" will appear here and say he just made things up.

Then Neal, who claims this forum is full of "characther assasins" will post info on the person as a revenge...
Click to expand...
Or he'll say that the unimpeachable source is compelled by some policy to change his story and lie. Historian has many arrows in his quiver.
 
bruto said:
Or he'll say that the unimpeachable source is compelled by some policy to change his story and lie. Historian has many arrows in his quiver.
Click to expand...
Well, if his source lied that would make him/her impeachable and thus hardly credible.

Bottom line no source then it didn't happen...just like his other made-up claims.
 
Just looked over some of the last 40 posts or so on this thread and moved some of the more egregiously off-topic or borderline breaches of your Membership Agreement to AAH. Remember to keep to the topic of the thread which would appear to be something to do with an "invisible bigfoot"... and do not attack each other.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Darat
 
historian said:
One trend I noticed here is that, to a man every person who seeks to deny the existence of bigfoot, also seeks to deny the occurrence of the Philadelphia experiment. That coincidence would seem to me, more than chance. The chances of a random group of eight posters on the internet who all have the same beliefs would be 1/4 to the 8 power. Or one chance in 65536. Not even a one percent chance. Now what do these two items have in common? Embarassment? Hard to grasp? Upsetting? Volatile subject matter at The Bermuda Triangle watering hole? Mmmmmmm? Now what could it be?
Click to expand...

Only eight posters? I think you're seriously underestimating the number of people that meet your criteria of 'deny the existence of bigfoot...deny the occurrence of the Philadelphia experiment' .. I'm willing to bet we could get your total waaaay higher than that dude.

On a more serious note, your use of the phrase 'seek to deny' implies that the work is all coming from the side of the skeptics. Let's face it, the work and general scurrying around is being done on the side of the believers, the septics are just sitting down, having a nice relaxing drink and looking on in an amused way at the antics that play out in front of them.
 
I will gladly join the 8, though I dispute the wording that suggests that skeptics "seek to deny" the existence of bigfoot. We seek good evidence and deny that any so far exists, which is a very different thing. But I don't see anything unusual or surprising about people being skeptical of two things at once. I think it would be far more surprising to find a bigfoot skeptic who believed in the Philadelphia experiment, since the Philadelphia experiment is far sillier and more unlikely than bigfoot is.
 
Me too!

I want to be one of the eight!

I tihnk you'll find - as others have written - that what we look for here are three things:

Evidence; Evidence and Evidence.

While you keep on supplying No Evidence; No Evidence and more No Evidence, you can't really expect to be taken seriously, now can you?

Presumably it was Bigfoot that ran the Philly Experiment?
 
I thought the phrase was "location, location, location"? Oops, wrong forum. Sorry.

Anyway, I've always wondered why tripling the term gives it greater weight? Do sets of three, or does the number three, always have a special significance?

Consider, if you will, the following among countless other examples:

"The Three R's"
"666"
"The Three Stooges"
"Knock three times"
"Third time is the Charm"
"Pi (well, kinda)"
"3 strikes, you're out!"
"one, two, three-go!"
"The Third world"
"Three branches of govt. (U.S.)"

Any thoughts?
 
I will gladly join the 8, though I dispute the wording that suggests that skeptics "seek to deny" the existence of bigfoot. We seek good evidence and deny that any so far exists, which is a very different thing. But I don't see anything unusual or surprising about people being skeptical of two things at once. I think it would be far more surprising to find a bigfoot skeptic who believed in the Philadelphia experiment, since the Philadelphia experiment is far sillier and more unlikely than bigfoot is.
Click to expand...

Well, you can put my name on the list too.
I'll actually be embarrassed not to be on that list.;)
 
I think an intelligent, invisible, dimension-hopping bigfoot supported by the US government, various universities, and Stephen Hawking, is sillier than an experimental disappearing warship.
 
historian said:
One trend I noticed here is that, to a man every person who seeks to deny the existence of bigfoot, also seeks to deny the occurrence of the Philadelphia experiment. That coincidence would seem to me, more than chance. The chances of a random group of eight posters on the internet who all have the same beliefs would be 1/4 to the 8 power. Or one chance in 65536. Not even a one percent chance. Now what do these two items have in common? Embarassment? Hard to grasp? Upsetting? Volatile subject matter at The Bermuda Triangle watering hole? Mmmmmmm? Now what could it be?
Click to expand...
To date, nobody that I am aware of has tried to disprove anyone. Rather, all we've asked is for you to provide proof of your claims...something that you have been totally unable to do.
 
The Invisible Bigfoot is Moving UP UP UP in the World!!!

Over a year ago, they started out on The Travel Channel at 11 PM, that nobody watches
Then they moved up to The History Channel on Wednesday at 10 PM, that gets more traffic
Now, Incredibly,
Bigfoot is on The Discovery Channel along with those incredible inter-dimensional Little People from Florensis. (Pssst, They are a bigfoot relative, but scientists just have not figured that out yet. I have seen them and I have a photograph of two with their eyes glowing)

Tonight, Monday Night 1/07/2008 Hobbits 8 PM

Tonight, Monday Night 1/07/2008 Sasquatch, Legend Meets Science 9PM

Tonight, Late Monday Night 1/08/2008 Sasquatch, Legend Meets Science 1AM

Skeptics should avoid these channels at all costs. Facts that support alternate viewpoints, can be shouted down on the internet with repetitive demands for "Prove It!" and other mind numbing verbal games. But the TV set will not listen to you. Nor will The Discovery Channel Listen to you. My advice is if someone else in the household demands to watch the show, is lock yourself in the bathroom and assume a sitting position on the water closet (with lid down of course), and chant over and over again "No, No, No, This Isn't Happening, No, No, No, This isn't Happening!" Do it in short bursts and don't forget to breath between sets. You may want to have a wad of toilet paper in one hand, just in case some tears should start to roll down your face. If that doesn't work, get up off of the lid, lift the lid up, place head in toilet and with one free groping hand, flush the toilet repeatedly until you feel refreshed. Towel off until dry. Do not leave bathroom until show is over. Tomorrow, when coworkers ask you at the office as to whether you saw the show last night, say something smart alec like "Bigfoot? Do you actually believe that stuff?"
 
Last edited:
Locknar said:
To date, nobody that I am aware of has tried to disprove anyone. Rather, all we've asked is for you to provide proof of your claims...something that you have been totally unable to do.
Click to expand...

Instructions to Locknar,
step 1. Remove mudflap sized horse blinders
step 2. Open your eyes
step 3. Look at the picture that is attached on this page and directly under my blog I.D. That my boy, is an orb that is likely in the 3rd or 4th dimension. It is invisible to the naked eye. It is likely an actual bigfoot in it's orb phase. So there you have a photograph of an invisible bigfoot. Orbs like that are in your face, much of the time that you are out in the forest, assuming you have ever been out in the forest. That is some of my evidence. I also have video of bigfoot orbs dancing in my lights, on Saturday night, presumeably in celebration of Independence Day. And they are playing by flying in and out of some kind of PORTAL. No one else has video like that. I also have lots of other stills of likely bigfoot orbs as well. I have observed bigfoot orbs flying over, circling, landing nearby and hear two foot steps as that phase change out of the orb phase into an invisible bigfoot in the dimension once removed from ours. I have observed bigfoot orbs, motoring down the road at night, looking for the source of bigfoot calls. I have observed a likely parent, offspring pair of bigfoot orbs, the smaller following the larger, flying down the road at night. They were all invisible to the naked eye, but visible with night vision. I am a past speaker for the International Bigfoot Society on Bigfoot Orbs.

Where is your evidence that Bigfoot is never invisible?
 
Last edited:
historian said:
My advice is if someone else in the household demands to watch the show, is lock yourself in the bathroom and assume a sitting position on the water closet (with lid down of course), and chant over and over again "No, No, No, This Isn't Happening, No, No, No, This isn't Happening!"
Click to expand...
Anyone else here pretty sure Histo speaks from experience in this regard?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom