• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Bigfoot: The Invisible Variety

Was this thread started by a split off from another thread originally?
I ask because starting at page one, post one, it sure seems that way, but it doesn't look right without any quotes, but it seems like quotes, and it's usually called out as a split off thread as well, but here it isn't, unless all that stuff's invisible, like Bigfoot.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, it was a split from another thread(s). He had a habit of writing about invisible Bigfoot in all the Bigfoot threads. This was a way to try to contain him in one thread.
 
Oh yeah, I'd forgotten that he was teaberryeagle too. I miss some of the outer-limits nutcases like him, David Jay Jordan, Iacchus, and a few whose names I can't even remember - there was someone who was convinced natural formations were extraterrestrial sculptures, and a woman whose name I forget who managed to combine mormonism, belief in a hollow earth, and the conviction that she was Queen Elizabeth reincarnated, and did not know how a sonnet is put together. She was a blast!
 
bruto said:
Oh yeah, I'd forgotten that he was teaberryeagle too. I miss some of the outer-limits nutcases like him, David Jay Jordan, Iacchus, and a few whose names I can't even remember - there was someone who was convinced natural formations were extraterrestrial sculptures, and a woman whose name I forget who managed to combine mormonism, belief in a hollow earth, and the conviction that she was Queen Elizabeth reincarnated, and did not know how a sonnet is put together. She was a blast!
Click to expand...

That was Janadele. I like to go back and read some of those old (before my time) threads, those were the days. Right now, I'm reading Davidjayjordan's "432" thread; I don't think I've ever seen so extreme an example of the really committed woo-ist so in love with the sound of his own voice that he just can not hear anything anyone else has to say. The closest I've seen him coming to an acknowledgment that his "exact numbers" (like the distance to the moon being 216,000 miles) that proved the design of the Lord were, in fact, incorrect numbers was to say that they were "close enough."
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom