[Split]Moon hoaxes - split from: Mars Voyage too Soon?

[Shrinker]

www.apolloarchive.com has 16mm still frames of Armstrong with his visor up. You can clearly see brightly lit pink skin. Sorry I can't link directly to the images, but there's one shown at the top of the above link.

 

[Shrinker]

The cross-hairs etched on the Hasselblad reseau plate definitely seem to be spaced at 10mm intervals (can't recall who suggested that here), as extension of those distances to the edges of the photos on this site puts those images at 52mm square. I'm not bothered whether you use 52mm or 55mm to calculate the FOV when you get around to taking up my earlier challenge. I don't think it will significantly affect the outcome.

Don't hold your breath. I have 3 work deadlines to beat before Xmas, and I haven't started my shopping yet.

 

[I Am He]

I say, All Wind. When they beat this one down too, what else are you going to bring up?? So far you've been wrong with everything you've said.

May I ask you a question?? Did you write all that stuff yourself, or did you have someone type it for you??

I Am He

 

[Southwind17]

I say, All Wind. When they beat this one down too, what else are you going to bring up?? So far you've been wrong with everything you've said.

May I ask you a question?? Did you write all that stuff yourself, or did you have someone type it for you??

I Am He

When the famous Aldrin photo's convincingly debunked per my earlier challenge I think I'll let it lie then. Not many people coming forward though. Fancy a go?!

 

[I Am He]

A Go? With such an expert on Photo Annalist as yourself?? Why I would never even think of changeling your outstanding expertise. I'm just here watching what's the next thing you chose to add to the list. After all you've been wrong with everything so far, one more thing should not matter.

I Am He

PS: Did it ever cross your mind that they can see right through your little game??

 

[Southwind17]

I'm just here watching what's the next thing you chose to add to the list. After all you've been wrong with everything so far, one more thing should not matter.

Can you not read very well? I repeat:

When the famous Aldrin photo's convincingly debunked per my earlier challenge I think I'll let it lie then.

I understand your reluctance to rise to the challenge.

 

[I Am He]

My dear All Wind: There is nothing to chalange you about. It has all been said, and I will not sit here and play your sill game. If you can't see that everything you said has been torn apart, then why do you think this next silly claim is any different? Enjoy.

I Am He

 

[Southwind17]

My dear All Wind: There is nothing to chalange you about. It has all been said, and I will not sit here and play your sill game. If you can't see that everything you said has been torn apart, then why do you think this next silly claim is any different? Enjoy.

I Am He

Goodbye.

 

[Belz...]

Goodbye.

"Good! If I keep ignoring all of those who defy my beliefs, I can continue to hold them without any doubts!"

 

[Southwind17]

"Good! If I keep ignoring all of those who defy my beliefs, I can continue to hold them without any doubts!"

Not the most appropriate quote, Belz, given that I have many doubts about many things, but the best you're capable of mustering, I have no doubt!

 

[Belz...]

Don't you have me on ignore ? If not, what are you waiting for ? I thought nothing I ever said was of any use ?

 

[Southwind17]

Don't you have me on ignore ? If not, what are you waiting for ? I thought nothing I ever said was of any use ?

I did have you on ignore, for a while, when you were being completely juvenile. I'm not waiting for anything, but if you gravitate towards childishness again, which I suspect you will, I suppose I might be tempted.

Meantime, your inane comments can sometimes hold mild, limited entertainment value, if only from a psychological perspective that leaves one pondering over what could possibly motivate you to mix with people of an evidently higher intellect, thereby highlighting your severely limited ability to socialize in an adult environment.

Your final thought is correct. I don't put people on ignore, though, just because they have no meaningful or constructive contribution to make to this Forum, including you!

Have you ever taken the time to identify the proportion of your posts that serve to develop or enhance a debate? You might do well to try it some time, but be prepared then to consider that your time here might be better spent elsewhere!

 

[Southwind17]

With regard to the challenge at Post #787, having thought about it further, I think it's important that the seeming anomaly between the 70mm format of the Hasselblad cameras that were supposedly used on the Apollo 11 EVA and the size of the famous Aldrin image (52/55mm) be addressed first, as this is critical to reconciling the distances referred to in the challenge. I suppose this apparent anomaly can be considered a 'fourth dimension' to the challenge! Any ideas, anybody?

 

[Shrinker]

With regard to the challenge at Post #787, having thought about it further, I think it's important that the seeming anomaly between the 70mm format of the Hasselblad cameras that were supposedly used on the Apollo 11 EVA and the size of the famous Aldrin image (52/55mm) be addressed first, as this is critical to reconciling the distances referred to in the challenge. I suppose this apparent anomaly can be considered a 'fourth dimension' to the challenge! Any ideas, anybody?

Good grief Southwind. Anomaly? are you serious? I already explained to you why the image isn't 70mm. Don't take my word for it - look it up.

 

[Belz...]

I did have you on ignore, for a while, when you were being completely juvenile.

You're ignoring the totality of evidence that shows, beyond any reasonable doubt, that men walked on the moon, and instead cherry-pick minutiae that you simply don't understand, claim to have accepted the "truth" of it all and then continue to ask inane questions about supposed "anomalies", and I'M being juvenile ?

I'm not waiting for anything, but if you gravitate towards childishness again, which I suspect you will, I suppose I might be tempted.

You know you want to.

Meantime, your inane comments can sometimes hold mild, limited entertainment value

Why, thank you.

if only from a psychological perspective that leaves one pondering over what could possibly motivate you to mix with people of an evidently higher intellect, thereby highlighting your severely limited ability to socialize in an adult environment.

How orgasmic it must have been to write these words. I suspect you truly do have an inferiority complex, so evident is your need to call everybody else stupid. Reminds me of Interesting_Ian.

Your final thought is correct. I don't put people on ignore, though, just because they have no meaningful or constructive contribution to make to this Forum, including you!

That's a very good policy.

Have you ever taken the time to identify the proportion of your posts that serve to develop or enhance a debate?

Nope. Why would I want to do that, anyway ? I'm waaaayyy too busy writing snark comments directed at people who should know better.

You might do well to try it some time, but be prepared then to consider that your time here might be better spent elsewhere!

How I spend my time is none of your business. I'll consider leaving if the posters I have any respect for begin to make the same comments towards me.

 

[Southwind17]

Good grief Southwind. Anomaly? are you serious? I already explained to you why the image isn't 70mm. Don't take my word for it - look it up.

I read and understood your explanation Shrinker, but felt that the image width difference of 18mm (52mm down from a 70mm film roll width) seemed too large. It's quite a difficult aspect to research, but this wikipedia page indicates that a loss of 9mm at each side of the film roll is feasible. Therefore, I agree that this doesn't consitute an anomaly, so we're back to the original challenge.

BTW, shouldn't you be out Xmas shopping, or at least wrapping now?!

 

[Southwind17]

I don't know who, if anybody, is still following this thread, but I plan on posting the challenge at Post #787 as a new thread unless somebody takes it on soon!

 

[Hindmost]

I don't know who, if anybody, is still following this thread, but I plan on posting the challenge at Post #787 as a new thread unless somebody takes it on soon!

Ahhhhhhhhh what the hades...I will answer your stuff if you respond how the laser ranger that was put on the moon during Apollo 11 is still working and providing distance data over 200 times a year and explain how the dust kicked up by the lunar rovers follows perfect ballistic paths consistent with 1/6 earth gravity and no atmosphere. And finally, how the moon rocks have been dated as older than any rocks on earth.

glenn

 

[Southwind17]

Ahhhhhhhhh what the hades...I will answer your stuff if you respond how the laser ranger that was put on the moon during Apollo 11 is still working and providing distance data over 200 times a year and explain how the dust kicked up by the lunar rovers follows perfect ballistic paths consistent with 1/6 earth gravity and no atmosphere. And finally, how the moon rocks have been dated as older than any rocks on earth.

glenn

Do you understand why I'm seeking a conclusive reconciliation of the seeming anomaly in the famous Aldrin photo?

 

[I Am He]

Do you understand why I'm seeking a conclusive reconciliation of the seeming anomaly in the famous Aldrin photo?

err.... Let me guess?? You like all the attention you're getting?? No, you don't believe that anyone walked on the moon, and your doing your everything you can to prove that that is so. Despite the fact that everyone here has proven that you are dead wrong. So please carry on, old boy. You're fooling no one but yourself. By The way, what do I win??

I Am He