kitakaze
Resident DJ/NSA Supermole
I REST MY CASE, YOUR HONOR!
I REST MY CASE YOUR HONOR!
Mr. Burgstahler, which one's resting?I REST MY CASE YOUR HONOR!
I REST MY CASE, YOUR HONOR!
I REST MY CASE YOUR HONOR!
Mr. Burgstahler, which one's resting?I REST MY CASE YOUR HONOR!
Hey madurobob, do we get like a cookie or something?
Would you please pm that info kit Ill take my chances with the big zaper .As the ranking NSA super mole/predator here it is my responsibility to inform you supressing the astounding reality of paranormal bigfoot is under our mandate.
I know you must be wondering the purpose of my divulging that to you but given the fact that I am also considered to be one the greatest paranormal bigfoot researchers with experience far beyond what Bungle can imagine, it goes without saying that it's complicated. I could PM you and let you know the clandestine details but then, you know... zap, zap.
Yet you claim he admitted this to a number of strangers during a speech?
You must be extending your U.S. Government paid for lunch break to about 2 hours now, Mr. Spook. And yet, you still have your job and it is not somehow bigfoot related? Gee, where do I sign up for that kind of flex time, the FBI?
Let me tell you a couple of things about the FBI. All of this came directly from various FBI agents.
The FBI picks up the bigfoot bodies.
The FBI denies the bigfoot's existence, if you ask them whether they exist. The FBI confirms the bigfoot's existence, if you tell them that they exist.
Go figure!
You can google Carter's autograph, Historian.
You must not be in Intelligence then, Mr. Intelligence. Here is why.
Your first post today, #1135, occurred at 10:05 am, Pacific time.
Your last post so far today, #1160, occurred at 11:32 am, Pacific time.
Yet you claim that you are on your lunch break. And you claim that you work for the U.S. Government. The U.S. Government does not allow 1 hour and 27 minute lunch breaks. OOOOOOOPS! Caught in another contradiction. Tell me it isn't so! An alleged U.S. Government employee, caught in a lie on the internet. Where are our tax dollars being spent? I guess that is why you use a phony name then.
Hist is slacking off his own mindset when he doesn't mention that Carter's signature can be forged.
To ***. Thanks. The greatest long time threat is global warming. I've never met a bigfoot. Best wishes, Jimmy Carter
Hist thats why I asked the state for a job studying bigfoot you can set your own hours dont you know anything man !
Show us some juice go get my file .
I'm not an NSA agent! Wait... does that make me look like an NSA agent?
Are you ticked off at being an NSA agent but never getting paid for it, too? I sure am! They don't even send me a frozen turkey for the holidays. Being an NSA agent sucks!
What do you know about what I know? And why should I seek legal counseling to tell you that I can read?You don't know anything about the interpretation of the law, now do you? You should seek legal counseling, before you make any more foolish statements about the U.S. Constitution.
It doesn't really matter how well you claim that you know Mr. Carter. That is irrelevant. Mr. Carter has no reason to admit to either you or anyone else on the planet, that he has ever met a Bigfoot. Just think of the possible political repercussions if he was to do such a foolish thing. So my ascertation still stands, that you have provided circumstantial evidence that Bigfoot is real, and nothing else.
I REST MY CASE YOUR HONOR!
Uh... didn't you just provide a photo that even other bigfoot believers called a sham?I provided everything I could possibly provide but it still wasent enough .
All that came out of it is that there is a possible photo of a real bigfoot not an invisable one out there that everybody thinks is a hoax .
I have hard evidence you do not your word is not enough .
Do bigfoot researchers really refer to themselves as "knowers"?Dont take me worng I think its great you beleave in bigfoot I am a knower as some researchers call ourselfs to be a knower you have had to have seen one face to face .
Do bigfoot researchers really refer to themselves as "knowers"?