The 9/11 Conspiracy Facts

It may not have stopped them. The point is, and has always been, that they didnt try. This is where criminal negligence differs from incompetence.

How?

One of your ideas was already being done, four would have created a gigantic uproar among the American people and would have been seen as a removal of some of their freedoms, something which no sane politician would ever dip his/her hand into at the time, and the other two would have ultimately accomplished nothing. How does that translate into criminal negligence, pray tell?
 
Finally we are making progress so you now are not claiming that 84% of Americans agree with you that the USG committed mass murder on 911. OH wait.....



So how many agree with you? Please remember the US as a population of 300,000,000. How many millions agree with you?




Because these countries.


are part of Interpol, they make up an organisation who’s aim is this...


Who have stated this.

and this
http://www.interpol.int/default.asp

YOU have evidence and facts that prove the USG was involved in mass murder, a crime against humanity.

Don’t you think they are entitled to know? Or is it better to keep coming here, calling everybody sheep and excusing yourself for not telling them?

You want an investiagtion don't you? You have the evidence don't you? What are you waiting for?

Here you go.

http://www.interpol.int/public/mail/mail3.asp?id=info

Stop protecting mass murderers, stop coming here and telling me all about it, DO SOMETHING, and inform the real investigators.

Why do I KNOW you will never contact them?
1, i have never claimed that

2. To take one example of the notion that people who know about the facts side with the TM, read:
http://www.911truth.org/page.php?page=zogby_2006

25. World Trade Center Building 7 is the 47-story skyscraper that was not hit by any planes during the September 11th attacks, but still totally collapsed later the same day. This collapse was not investigated by the 9/11 Commission. Are you aware of this skyscraper's collapse, and if so do you believe that the Commission should have also investigated it? Or do you believe that the Commission was right to only investigate the collapse of the buildings which were directly hit by airplanes?

I am not aware of World Trade Center Building 7's collapse
43%

I am aware of it and think the Commission should have investigated it
38

I am aware of it and think the Commission was right to investigate just the Twin Towers' collapse
14

Neither/Not sure
5

So 52% of US know about 7 of which ~70% believe it merits investigation by the 911 Commission. This is just one 911 fact that is not known by the general public. The pattern would repeat itself many many times, with other instances

3. They are not the people of the countries, as you well know. LMAO.

4. It is not the remit of Interpol to investigate state crime. Have you read their functions?

Secure global police communication services

INTERPOL runs a global police communications system called I-24/7, which provides police around the world with a common platform through which they can share crucial information about criminals and criminality.

Read more about I-24/7 and communications


Operational data services and databases for police

INTERPOL’s databases and services ensure that police worldwide have access to the information and services they need to prevent and investigate crimes. Databases include data on criminals such as names, fingerprints and DNA profiles, and stolen property such as passports, vehicles and works of art.

Read more about data services and databases.


Operational police support services

INTERPOL supports law enforcement officials in the field with emergency support and operational activities, especially in its priority crime areas of fugitives, public safety and terrorism, drugs and organized crime, trafficking in human beings and financial and high-tech crime. A Command and Co-ordination Centre operates 24 hours a day, seven days a week.

Read more about operational police support services

As the name suggests, they are an international police force. Since it is not the remit of any police organisation to investigate state crime, rather that of intl courts, writing to Interpol (rofl) is not going to do anything.

What a bright bunch of folks we have here!
 
How?

One of your ideas was already being done, four would have created a gigantic uproar among the American people and would have been seen as a removal of some of their freedoms, something which no sane politician would ever dip his/her hand into at the time, and the other two would have ultimately accomplished nothing. How does that translate into criminal negligence, pray tell?
If you refuse to take an act to protect your people,in the face of an unprecedented terror threat, just because you think it will "upset some people", then you are guilty of criminal negligence. Plain and simple, there is no argument about it.
 
1, i have never claimed that

2. To take one example of the notion that people who know about the facts side with the TM, read:
http://www.911truth.org/page.php?page=zogby_2006



So 52% of US know about 7 of which ~70% believe it merits investigation by the 911 Commission. This is just one 911 fact that is not known by the general public. The pattern would repeat itself many many times, with other instances

3. They are not the people of the countries, as you well know. LMAO.

4. It is not the remit of Interpol to investigate state crime. Have you read their functions?



As the name suggests, they are an international police force. Since it is not the remit of any police organisation to investigate state crime, rather that of intl courts, writing to Interpol (rofl) is not going to do anything.

What a bright bunch of folks we have here!

Really? So when did 911 suddenly become a state crime?

I guess the fact that citizen from 70 countries were murdered on 911 means that the international community has nothing to do with it then?

Interpol investigate international crimes,crimes against humanity, they indict international criminals, 911 was a crime against humanity, not a state crime, but nice try in trying to weasel your way of informing them

what a bright spark you are.
 
Last edited:
3 skyscrapers. 2 attacked
Just as I suspected, you don't have a clue. Or are you claiming that the 22-story Marriott WTC is still standing? And I'm glad to see you backed off your claims that WTC 7 had bombs in it, as that would surely qualify as being attacked.
 
If you refuse to take an act to protect your people,in the face of an unprecedented terror threat, just because you think it will "upset some people", then you are guilty of criminal negligence. Plain and simple, there is no argument about it.

Going by that logic, we should have impeached Lincoln for not freeing the slaves earlier. :rolleyes:
 
MJ, what makes you think that the Air Force/National Guard would have been able to intercept them in time? Remember, they only had minutes from the time the plane was confirmed hijacked to the crashes.
 
Is there a special branch of conspiracism that deals with demanding past events conform to what one can only know in hindsight? If so, what should we call it? Hindsightism? Twentytwentyacism? conspirasight?
 
If you refuse to take an act to protect your people,in the face of an unprecedented terror threat, just because you think it will "upset some people", then you are guilty of criminal negligence. Plain and simple, there is no argument about it.

So anytime someone is attacked, they should be arrested for not having stopped it? Because it should be impossible for any party to attack another party right? The only reason conflict in the world is because someone on the receiving end didn't do their job right?

I think maybe MJ should be the one in charge of preventing attacks on the country and see what it's like for a while. Then we can all hold him accountable for anything that happens. So let us know MJ. If you were in charge, are you saying that the US would never ever get attacked again? All terrorism would be gone and the country would be completely safe?
 
So 52% of US know about 7 of which ~70% believe it merits investigation by the 911 Commission. This is just one 911 fact that is not known by the general public. The pattern would repeat itself many many times, with other instances

Where are you getting your 70% number? From the data you posted:
I am aware of it and think the Commission should have investigated it
38%
 
Really? So when did 911 suddenly become a state crime?

I guess the fact that citizen from 70 countries were murdered on 911 means that the international community has nothing to do with it then?

Interpol investigate international crimes,crimes against humanity, they indict international criminals, 911 was a crime against humanity, not a state crime, but nice try in trying to weasel your way of informing them

what a bright spark you are.
1. I, and the TM, is alleging it is a state crime (OMG...)

2. Interpol merely facilitates international police cooperation. This should have been very simple for you to look up.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interpol

And you wonder why I have ignored this stupid post for so long. End it.
 
Just as I suspected, you don't have a clue. Or are you claiming that the 22-story Marriott WTC is still standing? And I'm glad to see you backed off your claims that WTC 7 had bombs in it, as that would surely qualify as being attacked.
1. If you implode a building, I would not say that you had "attacked" the building.

2. WTC 3 did not fall on 911.
 
Going by that logic, we should have impeached Lincoln for not freeing the slaves earlier. :rolleyes:
What the hell are you talking about?

Can you not understand, the simplest of simple facts- if there is an unprecedented threat of a spectacular, multiple attack on your country, you do something???

You may whinge about having Bush in office, but with such a total abdication of duty as a part of the electorate, reflected in your expectations for what a president should do for your security, I dont think you are in a position to whinge.
 
So anytime someone is attacked, they should be arrested for not having stopped it? Because it should be impossible for any party to attack another party right? The only reason conflict in the world is because someone on the receiving end didn't do their job right?

I think maybe MJ should be the one in charge of preventing attacks on the country and see what it's like for a while. Then we can all hold him accountable for anything that happens. So let us know MJ. If you were in charge, are you saying that the US would never ever get attacked again? All terrorism would be gone and the country would be completely safe?
What an unbelievably bad post. Read my reply above.

Boy oh boy.
 
1. I, and the TM, is alleging it is a state crime (OMG...)

2. Interpol merely facilitates international police cooperation. This should have been very simple for you to look up.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interpol

And you wonder why I have ignored this stupid post for so long. End it.

Because you are wrong

Resolution No AG-2001-RES-05

The Interpol General Assembly, meeting in Budapest from 24 to 28 September 2001 at its 70th session:
RECALLING the murderous attacks perpetrated against the world’s citizens in the United States of America on 11 September 2001,
SHOCKED by the loss of and injury to thousands of innocent lives from over 80 countries, including scores of police officers, firefighters and other public servants called to the scene to aid those in need,
DETERMINED that this abhorrent violation of law and of the standards of human decency must be condemned by every civilized person,
CONSCIOUS of our special responsibility as upholders of the laws of almost every nation of the world,
BEARING IN MIND the consistent record of Interpol at past General Assembly sessions in opposing all acts of terrorism, most recently at the 67th session in Cairo (1998) and the 68th session in Seoul (1999),
CONDEMNS these attacks as cold-blooded mass murder;
CONSIDERS that they constitute a crime against humanity;
COMMENDS the General Secretariat for its swift and decisive response to the 11 September tragedy in establishing an immediate and permanent 24-hour capability to respond to all Interpol member countries’ needs;
HONOURS the memory of the law enforcement officers, firefighters, emergency workers and private citizens who selflessly gave their lives to save others;
SHARES in the grief of all those who have been touched by this tragedy and other tragedies caused by terrorism;
REITERATES its unwavering commitment to the 'Cairo Declaration against Terrorism' (AGN/67/RES/12) and calls for enhanced international police and judicial collaboration to tackle terrorism and organized crime more effectively, for example by exploring all opportunities to co-ordinate legal, judicial and operational approaches;
EMPHASIZES the importance of making full use of the services available through Interpol to secure the arrest of fugitive offenders, to improve information sharing between member countries, to develop analysis of the threat more effectively and to facilitate the timely sharing of good practice;
REQUESTS that the General Secretariat afford the highest priority to the issuance of Interpol Red Notices for terrorist offenders whose arrest is sought by member countries and to accelerate the creation of an international database of counterfeit, forged and stolen identity documents;
URGES member countries to develop robust systems for the monitoring of suspicious financial transactions linked to terrorist activities in order to improve the ability of competent authorities to freeze such assets and so disrupt the funding of terrorism;
SOLEMNLY PLEDGES that the Organization and each of its Members endorsing the present resolution will collaborate without reservation, to the fullest extent permitted by law, in identifying every individual who assisted in committing these acts and bringing those who were responsible for them to justice.

They have pledged to bring to justice those responsible for cold blooded mass murder, a crime against humanity. Neither you nor the TM has the courage to present your “evidence" to such an organisation.

Why is that?
 
What the hell are you talking about?

Can you not understand, the simplest of simple facts- if there is an unprecedented threat of a spectacular, multiple attack on your country, you do something???

You may whinge about having Bush in office, but with such a total abdication of duty as a part of the electorate, reflected in your expectations for what a president should do for your security, I dont think you are in a position to whinge.

Can you not understand that when the report says they started unprecedented operations against AQ with the aid of 20 countries that this is not doing ZERO?

Will you admit the fact that they did in fact step up operations that summer?

You have had your ass handed to you in this thread and actively ignored posts like the dishonest person you really are
 
1. If you implode a building, I would not say that you had "attacked" the building.
If you did it illegally and while it was occupied you sure as hell attacked it! Can you show us the demolition permit for WTC 7 dated prior to 9/11?

2. WTC 3 did not fall on 911.
Are you going Ace Baker on us and claiming it was instead vaporized? Because it sure wasn't 22 storys tall at the end of the day on 9/11... :rolleyes:
 

Back
Top Bottom