The 9/11 Conspiracy Facts

[applecorped]

Don't tell me you'd forgotten mjd1982's favourite word? It was to this thread what 'realistice' was to Christophera.

Dave

Doh!

 

[Dave Rogers]

Somewhere in the world, it's still Bump an Old Thread Day.

Dave

 

[DGM]

Somewhere in the world, it's still Bump an Old Thread Day.

Dave

And you had to pick this one?


There has to be some sort of chant to put this thread back.....

 

[Dave Rogers]

It's not entirely irrelevant to current threads in the forum. MJD1982 started out trying to prove LIHOP at the same time as trying to prove WTC7 was deliberately demolished, and never reached the realisation that the two theories are contradictory; if al-Qaeda was deliberately allowed to carry through its attacks, then there was no sense to a conspiracy to fake those attacks, and if the attacks were faked, then the neglect of al-Qaeda as a threat was perfectly justified because they weren't the ones carrying out the attack. The result was a self-contradictory mess, and it wasn't helped by the citing of evidence in favour of LIHOI as if it suggested complicity. And this is the road down which Childlike Empress appears to be heading in the Rumsfeld / WTC7 thread, but starting from a snippet that isn't evidence of anything except that Rumsfeld doesn't share the truthers' obsession with WTC7. It might be worth casting an eye over this thread, and noting that refusal to choose between incompatible alternative theories won't usually end well.

Dave

PS. I hope that fools Darat if he starts cracking down on Bump an Old Thread Day.