The 9/11 Conspiracy Facts

[nicepants]

2. Thats one group. Go and show what the others have done. And move onto the othr 1/2 points

You're the one saying that they're not in it for the money, if that's the case, dylan could "sell" these dvds at cost. Or is he going to spend that $800,000 on a new investigation?

 

[nicepants]

Then you shouldnt find any difficulty in responding to it. Why do you then?

Why do I respond?

Or

Why do I (strawman) find difficulty responding?


I have no difficulty responding to your unsupported ideas and conjecture. You, apparently, have difficulty responding to my questions, or you would have provided proof that your buddy at FT is being harassed to keep quiet.

 

[lapman]

Why dont you read the doc, it wil remove lits of cobwebs



These are some of the reasons for the long process. Difficulties, that would be circumvented bya new PH

Are you really that simple. The fact that the JSF was not canceled clearly shows how ridiculous your claims are. It may have been PNAC's design, but it was never part of the defense design for the future.

LOL

Your dumbest comment to date. So hegemony cannot be achieved through war. Examples?

Again, your complete lack of comprehension is showing through. Where "cannot be achieved" came from "could be lost" is beyond me. Your comment is total idiocy.

It went exactly to their design- 3.5-3.8% of GDP

Form here:

The modest increase planned for next year will still leave Pentagon spending at about 3.4 % of GDP, and Congressional Budget Office projections are that the proportion will decline to approximately 3% by 2007.

At the end of 2006, the defense spending was 3.3%

Iraq/Saddam is mentioned ~45 times in the docc

And PH is mentioned twice which you deemed non-related. So Saddam's/Iraq being mentioned does not equate to the Iraq invasion being a part of the design.

No? Then what is ths oil law that is about to be passed in Iraq handing major control and profits over to forein firms that the Iraqis are protesting about?
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=07/07/17/1355251

Extremely ambiguous. What is the exact wording of said law that would allow the US to be able to take complete control of the Iraqi oil?

 

[lapman]

No, you say he isnt credible because the state dept disagree with him.

I stated this where?

Dont even go into law.

Why? So you won't be embarrassed by your lack of knowledge?

They were supplied to CP. They exist. They would be supplied in court

True, if CP wasn't stretching the truth or the documents were legitimate. So why hasn't the "Truth Movement" obtain copies of said documents? Since these are supposed to be government supplied, a FOIA request could be made.

Again, a substanceless piece of opinion, nothing I can say here

as above

Can't argue with the truth, can you?

Good. So you dont think that SF is alleging FT had a power down on the w/e b4 911.

Again, comprehension of a zygote. SF alleges that PA had a power down on multiple floors and FT occupied some of them. Hence his reason for being in the towers that weekend. So FT was affected by the power down, not took part in the power down. Why is this simple concept so completely beyond your level of comprehension? Your continued allegation that FT is covering up anything:

illustrates your moronic and untenable position very well

 

[HeyLeroy]

Borat is a direct vehicle for Cohen's social commentary. Thus if Borat is racist, logically so is Cohen.

Using your logic, Thomas Harris is a cannibalistic serial killer. Is Thomas Harris a cannibalistic serial killer, mjd1982?

Dude, do you not realize that you're showing an incomprehension of the differences between fantasy and reality when you say things like that?

(snip)
Pffff... Hilarious. Ok, boy, i dont even know if I want to go through this again...

He has stated that there was a power down in his offices, right? He is implying that something dodgy was happening, right? FT were having this pwer dowm, right? FT have not come out with details of this allegedly nefarious power down, not reported it to any sources, right? Thus they are involved in the cover up of of something nefarious. This is pretty damn simple.
(Snip)

Still waiting for mjd1982 to explain the relevance, as he has stated that the Twin Towers did not collapse due to controlled demolitions...

 

[Unsecured Coins]

Still waiting for mjd1982 to explain the relevance, as he has stated that the Twin Towers did not collapse due to controlled demolitions...

Good luck with that. I'm gonna go get tanked

 

[HeyLeroy]

Hup-to, Sarge.

 

[Vincent Vega]

Originally Posted by mjd1982. Borat is a direct vehicle for Cohen's social commentary. Thus if Borat is racist, logically so is Cohen.

Is anyone else not surprised he gets this completely backasswards?

 

[Unsecured Coins]

Hup-to, Sarge.

Well, not right now. I gotta finish up UC 6

 

[BillyRayValentine]

Well, you were the one that said the film is "dripping in symbolism... and serious intent", and thus cannot be a comedy...

(Bolding mine.)

Last comment - promise - just that what we have here is known as a teachable moment.

To wit, substitute "is not" (what I said) for "thus cannot be" (your contrived, egregiously false strawman), and note the very substantial difference.

Such mendacity, particularly when it's so blatant, reflects poorly on you. Try remembering that going forward and you'll appear less foolish.

Here endeth the lesson.

 

[nicepants]

Borat is a direct vehicle for Cohen's social commentary. Thus if Borat is racist, logically so is Cohen.

Borat is a fictional character played by Cohen.

Cohen is not a racist simply because he plays a racist character. Just as Robin Williams is not a doctor simply because he played Patch Adams, or Tom Hanks an astronaut because he played one in Apollo 13.

You can't judge an actor based on one of his/her characters.

 

[beachnut]

To say this thread is moronic is an insult to morons everywhere. I propose that Mjd is given an honorary Stundie for failing to present any new evidence after over 2,600 posts.

Still no facts from you? Why? Over 2000 posts and not a fact to support your OP yet. Your opening post is more an oxymoron type of thing, don't you think?

 

[Corsair 115]

I'm pretty certain this isnt your first post here...

Actually, you are correct. I missed my own name in the list of posters for this thread. This post marks my 14th entry in this thread.

...nonetheless, I dont know what your point is about my posting here. What is your point?

No point, I just found the numerics interesting. You've got 721 of 763, or 94.5%, of all the posts you have on the boards here in this one single thread. It's not something I've really seen before, to see someone with their posts so concentrated into a single thread. Usually there is at least some spreading around of posting into different threads.

 

[DGM]

Actually, you are correct. I missed my own name in the list of posters for this thread. This post marks my 14th entry in this thread.

No point, I just found the numerics interesting. You've got 721 of 763, or 94.5%, of all the posts you have on the boards here in this one single thread. It's not something I've really seen before, to see someone with their posts so concentrated into a single thread. Usually there is at least some spreading around of posting into different threads.

The sad part is he's yet to convince anyone of.............anything!

 

[MIKILLINI]

Actually, it's pretty simple; Mjd believes...And I can't express how deep this belief is...that the Neocons are the watchdogs of the New Century and they wanted their empirical DESIGN to happen sooner in order for TRANSFORMATIONS to happen EASIER, although time constraints would not change significantly for implementation. It's just unfalsifiable propitiousness in his mind. That's point 1.

But now? A power down in the trade towers? What for? Mjd, if you don't believe the towers were destroyed by planted devices, why are you arguing the power down situation pointed out by Hey Leroy?

You have showed your hand to us "ilk". Intellectually, how could you have missed this?

 

[mjd1982]

no, you are incorrect, he uses borat to allow him to make fun of people, now answer the question i asked do not avoid again please

was warren mitchell a racist?

willie is in no way racist or can be deemed a racist character or written to be a racist character, i am scottish mate so i would know this better than you, it does not offend scots people in anyway

however if i was chinese and you made that remark i would think you racist and crass like borat

1. What was your question?
2. I also have a scottish mate. Silly point. Willie is a pejorative stereotype of a scottish person. This is your grounds for racism, in real terms. So why isnt he racist?
3. You start off by repeating me. Borat is a direct vehicle for Cohen's comedy and commentaries. Thus if Borat is racist, since he is an espousal of Cohens views, Cohen must also be racist. I dont know who Warren Mitchell is

 

[mjd1982]

yet again you avoid the issue, i said "in some ways", you are cherry picking the parts you would like to answer again

could or could not this murder have killed more than litvinenko, considering the manner it was carried out?

was it done on foreign soil?

was it only domestic victims in 911 like you claimed?

if the MET has reason to believe there was a conspiracy to murder british nationals in the US then you think they would just ignore these allegations would they? are the MET in on the conspiracy?

again why would they not at least start an investigation into the initial claims ? you said it was inconceivable they would travel abroad for an investigation like this when in fact they have already done so with a similar case?

your avoidance of points is ignorant to say the very least, if you cant answer something then just say you can't

wtf are u talking about? I have answered all your questions. I am telling you again- the Met investigatin Putin for killing a Russian spy is insignificant in every respect to investigating, by implication, Bush, for killing 3000 US.

If oyu cannot understand this, then I am willing to accept that it is questions of honestly, rather than intellect that hold you back

 

[mjd1982]

you know nothing about the oil industry, so do not even go down this road, you will only look more foolish, this is just a gentle warning to save you any more embarrassment

stick to your speculation and reading between the lines about PNAC, scott and OSL

Its not me, its Democracy Now. You'll have to prove how they are lying/wrong.

 

[mjd1982]

You're the one saying that they're not in it for the money, if that's the case, dylan could "sell" these dvds at cost. Or is he going to spend that $800,000 on a new investigation?

which new investigation? How do you know what he's spent the money on?

 

[mjd1982]

Why do I respond?

Or

Why do I (strawman) find difficulty responding?


I have no difficulty responding to your unsupported ideas and conjecture. You, apparently, have difficulty responding to my questions, or you would have provided proof that your buddy at FT is being harassed to keep quiet.

No, that's just illustrative of the fact that you have no interest in honest debate. There is zero feasible way I have of providing proof that he is being hushed up. I can provide evidence, but not proof. This is obvious, and hence so is your disinclination to honest debate. So why are you here?