• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Psychic Detectives are real

polomontana,

Did you know about Goldner before I told you?

Which example did you refer to (white hair, author, etc)?

How can wrong guesses prove life after death? Why isn't that evidence of guessing?

If you dismiss skeptics because you claim they have a vested interest, why don't you dismiss Schwartz for the very same reason?
 
It's just conjecture and 3rd party hearsay.

At what point are you going to understand that EVERYTHING you've posted is "just conjecture and 3rd party hearsay", and there's not a shred of evidence for anything you believe?
 
Aepervious,

Why would someone who experienced an N.D.E. be aware of hidden object? You have N.D.E.'s that describe everything that's happening around their bodies. The way you test this is have a designated person come in when one of these procedures take place and then you have them place a wallet or something on the bed where the person is having their N.D.E.

If the person mentions this if they are revived then there you go. There's already a ton of evidence to support N.D.E.'s. If this were to occur, I'm sure the skeptic will try to explain it away to support their belief system. This is how dogma works and some skeptics are dogmatic about their skepticism.

No there is NOT.

The study I saw (I would have to search it again) was double blinded. That is not even the nurse / doctor could say what object was hidden. Nobody present could see it directly, not even the patient after being reanimated, EXCEPT if had been floating a few inches above the head level of the medical personal. And that is the salient point. And this failed miserably as none of the NDE person could describe the object.

I wish I would have time to find the reference, as right now I am only offering info without any proof (that is, as worthless as your own rambling).
 
But they are magic bears ON TV!!

239512sXaW_w.jpg
 
polomontana says "viktor zammit say there is a life after death ! He challenge everybody to prove there is no life after death"

Skeptic says "you can't prove a negative. I ve an invisible gremlin at home. you win a lot of money if you can prove it does not exists."

polomontana says "this is bogus, prove you have a gremlin".

DUH

So WE skeptic have to prove a NEGATIVE and inexistence of something, while YOU and Mr ZAMMIT get a FREE PASS ?

I am done with this thread. You are either a troll, or incoherent and unable to reason logically so much you are immersed in your woo belief.
 
*Bing Bong* Calling all passengers. This is the final call for the zero eight hundred hours flight to cuckoo land. Could Mr Polomongwomble please report to the check in desk immediately.
 
I'm going to be in big trouble with the government for this, but what the hey:
Nuclear power is a fraud. Everything you've heard about atoms and fission is a lie, to disguise it's real source. It's actually psychic energy focused on a plate of fig newtons. The quantum vibrations cause the spirits to become agitated, and are made to turn huge handcranks to soothe their anger. Trained "nukes" are actually psychics forced into servitude. When not providing free energy for the government, they are forced to do secret detective work, only shown in brave documentaries on an obscure cable channel.
It's true! I heard it, man! Usually after eating some mouldy bread I found behind the couch!
 
Undergoing Pre-flight Checklist:

Passenger presents claim

Skeptic Air demands evidence

Passenger provides inadequate evidence

Skeptic Air explains problems with evidence, offers other evidence showing claim invalid.

Passenger ignores explanation, presents more of the same

Skeptic Air tries one more time before placing passenger in baggage hold and commencing mockery.
 
As a new poster, this thread is among the most interesting I have encountered. Especially the bear part. I wonder is a psychic detective ever searched for a missing bear? Of course, what type of bear? I'm sure it would be easier for anyone to find a brown bear in the snow, or a polar bear in the forest? But I digress...

As far as psychics suing anyone, was she suing because of wrongful imprisionment? You don't need to be a pyschic to do that. If I recall, Noreen Renier sued John Merrell and won, and it had nothing to do with whether or not she has pyschic ability. That has never been tested and proved.
 
Last edited:
CB1, I couldn't agree more. Polomontana has given us ample proof that common sense, logic, evidence and kittens are unable to penetrate his woo-addled brain. Let's send him back to his native habitat:

Under the bridge
Near the goat pasture
Cloudcuckooland
 
...As far as psychics suing anyone, was she suing because of wrongful imprisionment? You don't need to be a pyschic to do that. If I recall, Noreen Renier sued Gary P. Posner and won, and it had nothing to do with whether or not she has pyschic ability. That has never been tested and proved.
Wasn't it John Merrell, not Gary Posner, that was successfully sued for libel?
 
The police in the Etta Smith case did not believe that she got her information from psychic abilities. Therefore, by your own logic, that proves she didn't. There's a perfectly reasonable explanation for how she did it. Why not accept it?

If there were loads of well designed experiments showing that psychic powers are real, I might accept that Smith could have gotten her information psychically. But there are load of well designed experiments that show that psychic powers don't exist. Therefore, I accept the much more likely explanation that she got her information from a third party.

So far as I know, Etta Smith is the ONLY psychic that has ever actually helped the police to solve a crime. As for the TV show, claim after claim falls apart when you look into them. We're left with one, and she got her information from a third party.
 
I'm going to be in big trouble with the government for this, but what the hey:
Nuclear power is a fraud. Everything you've heard about atoms and fission is a lie, to disguise it's real source. It's actually psychic energy focused on a plate of fig newtons. The quantum vibrations cause the spirits to become agitated, and are made to turn huge handcranks to soothe their anger. Trained "nukes" are actually psychics forced into servitude. When not providing free energy for the government, they are forced to do secret detective work, only shown in brave documentaries on an obscure cable channel.
It's true! I heard it, man! Usually after eating some mouldy bread I found behind the couch!

Heyyyyyyyyyy, what next...are you going to reveal the secret handshake on youtube...

glenn
 
polomontana,

I wrote earlier:

polomontana,

I see on US TV all the time high-profile cases of missing persons or spectacular murders.

Your claim is that there are people who can by psychic means find the missing and identify the murderers and, further, that there are police officers who are convinced that this is possible.

Why are these cases not solved? :confused:

Perhaps you missed the question.

Possibly you could try and give me an answer. I'm really interested.
 
The matter was discussed on the LARRY KING LIVE by Nancy Grace from Court TV.

Well folks, there you have it...proof positive; Nancy Grace discussed it on Larry King Live so it must be true.

I'm sorry...just can not contain the laughter here.

Anyway...for what it is worth here is the CNN link

In the end, you have someone that found a body...nothing more.
 
Last edited:
I'm going to be in big trouble with the government for this, but what the hey:
Nuclear power is a fraud. Everything you've heard about atoms and fission is a lie, to disguise it's real source. It's actually psychic energy focused on a plate of fig newtons. The quantum vibrations cause the spirits to become agitated, and are made to turn huge handcranks to soothe their anger. Trained "nukes" are actually psychics forced into servitude. When not providing free energy for the government, they are forced to do secret detective work, only shown in brave documentaries on an obscure cable channel.
It's true! I heard it, man! Usually after eating some mouldy bread I found behind the couch!

Quick, give the government Sylvia's location. Maybe they can force her into servitude?
 
So, still no math. That, to me, proves one or both of the following:
  • You are a troll seeking only to mock the more learned
  • You have not the least understanding of subatomic physics
With all due fairness, the laws of physics that model the activity of subatomic particles are extremely unintuitive. They are accessible to us only through mathematics. As you cannot back up your claims regarding the nature or the activity of subnuclear particles, your claims must be dismissed. That is no great shock to any of us because your claims superseded by a long shot what is known about sub-nuclear componentes.

One of the major mistakes made by people who don't grasp non-Newtonian mechanics is that they assume that what goes for small particles can be applied willy-nilly in the macro world. That is just not so. If you can solve the equations correctly for these particles in a different scenario than has already been contemplated, have at it. Only then will your idiot theories hold any water. Until then, don't bother the humans.
 

Back
Top Bottom