July 2007 Stundie Nominations

This speaks for itself.

look-up@LCF forum said:
They want us to give up our liberty simply because they say so. No, even if you show us proof that 93 crashed at that site, we are not going to give up our liberty, I'm proud to say.
Click to expand...
 
Mobyseven said:
Eh, it's pretty much the same alphabet - they're all Latin based, just with different diacritical marks. The only difference I can think of is the ß in German, also from the Latin alphabet, but dropped from use in other languages.

But if it makes you feel any better, Stundie is still suggesting that Esperanto is English with his remark.
Click to expand...



And the Latin alphabet is based on the Greek, which is based on Egyptian Hieroglyphs...

So looks like it's Mummies all round then.

-Gumboot
 
I need to nominate this part of a post.
Max Photon said:
I'm the one that is posting my ideas for all to see and criticize, and braving going in to hostile territory to do so.

You guys are pseudo-skeptics. (I think the technical term is mental couch potatoes.)

You are the jokes.


Respectfully,

Max

---
Click to expand...

So, in short, he calls the debunkers "pseudo-skeptics" and "jokes", and he signs with "Respectfully".
 
Belz... said:
Are you sure about that last bit ?
Click to expand...

Working from a very falliable memory, the Greek alphabet came to us by way of the Phonecian 'alphabet', which developed from early Phonecian cuneiform (sp?).

Egyptian hieroglyphic symbols evolved over time into demotic script, which was in turn influenced heavily by the Greek alphabet, evolving into the Coptic alphabet.

Now, who wants to correct all the mistakes I undoubtably made? :boxedin:
 
ihaunter said:
To be fair, I don't recall him ever actually debating 9/11 stuff. It may have seemed that way when he was attempting to prove some of the stupid things said by CTists were not so stupid. Mostly, he just seems to have a problem with the fact that some posters on this board have a sense of humor.
Click to expand...



Well, there was this time. Not that it went any better than any other posts of his.
 
From a fellow named Skip on Reason magazine's Hit&Run blog:


And as for 911 how many of you pseudo scientists could park a Boeing 757 in your two car garage? Unless Houdini or David Copperfield posts here, it is unlikely the rest of you could accomplish such an illusion. That's the story your government has convinced you to believe: A box cutter weilding IslamoMuslimofaciastradicalArabterrorist who couldn't even pilot a single engine Cessna, flew a Boeing 757 with fighter pilot precision at speeds of 500 mph through a 16 foot wide hole into the interior of the Pentagon. Now who needs the tin foil?
Click to expand...


Is it just me, or is he implyig the 16 foot hole was already there? :confused: :boggled:
 
ihaunter said:
To be fair, I don't recall him ever actually debating 9/11 stuff. It may have seemed that way when he was attempting to prove some of the stupid things said by CTists were not so stupid. Mostly, he just seems to have a problem with the fact that some posters on this board have a sense of humor.
Click to expand...

Mmmm, I see we're back to the forum's favourite topic again.

To your credit at least you have some perspective ihaunter.
 
Last edited:
William Rea said:
Don't mention the Stundies, I mentioned them once and I didn't get away with it!
Click to expand...



In the interests of accuracy, perhaps you should have said you "mentioned them forty-seven times"; that would have been vealy good.
 
Par said:
In the interests of accuracy, perhaps you should have said you "mentioned them forty-seven times"; that would have been vealy good.
Click to expand...

Really? You counted them? Isn't that OCD type behaviour?

I love veal by the way.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom