Wrong, edge.
JREF and the TV producer both came to the conclusion that you weren't ready to test. That was the first and foremost complication. They obviously made a good call.
I also assume the test wasn't going to take place "on limestone just like in the office".
The TV producer offered this,
After our detailed discussion with JREF members, we've came to a
conclusion that at this point, it is not possible for us to provide you with
the protocal that you'll be satisfied with.
Meanwhile, we're planning to produce series of shows featuring Mr. Randi,
and One Million Dollar Paranormal Challenge, so if the timing works out,
we would like to reconsider your test on our show.
At a limestone quarry in Japan, the way the test was done at office the first time, all ten containers on the ground, at once.
About four hours split into two days or what ever they would accommodate.
The only thing that changed was from the creek bank to the quarry.
Time was not really an issue since it took about 4 hours at the JREF office.
I was never given an explanation of what that issue was?
Three days later after being turned down for that expedition I learned about the scales working in the calibration of the target and empties as I experimented.
This increased my odds to the degree of 60 to 90%.
I then changed the protocol to include that.
I had to think of time and place since that opportunity passed. They didn't come up with anything else so I worked on that.
The time-line for an opportunity came when the resort owner said I could dredge there, but not till after season which would be September.
That is the last month of dredging season up here the month of September.
If they couldn't do the test here, then October was the next window of opportunity, which would mean I would have to go to Florida.
I wrote that, pages ago on this post.
So common sense would indicate that we had a few more days to come to an agreement.
And up to a year really to come to an agreement on a date to actually do the test.
I won't accept a protocol that eliminates the scale as it is a major break through, and I won't take it indoors in an office or in a TV studio, And you know the reasons why.
The only thing left was the placebo targets and the time issue,
[length of the test, how much time] in the protocol that I had sent in.
Spectator wrote up the correct protocol and it included what I needed it also took care of both issues.
What good would it do to scan a TV studio and say there is no neutral ground just like in the office test at JREF headquarters even though I braved it at that time and took the test there the first time?
Just for their convenience to televise a failed attempt for the second time?
I don’t think so!