• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

[Moderated]175 did NOT hit the South tower.

Status
Not open for further replies.
twinstead said:
Malcolm, as punishment for falsely accusing innocent people of mass murder, Karma may require you to eventually be accused of a crime you didn't commit but convicted nonetheless simply by hearsay, conjecture, and 'gut feeling' with no compelling physical evidence or eye witnesses accounts at all.

Wouldn't that just suck big time?
Click to expand...
You are confusing me with moslems.
 
malcolm kirkman said:
I've already answered with regard to Govt reports on 9/11. I don't like to read fiction, I find it childish.
Click to expand...
But your stories are so good! They almost sound like stuff that could have happened to people! Almost!
Don't stop telling me stories now, Unka Malcolm!
 
malcolm kirkman said:
Just the one obvious claim.
175 did not hit the south tower.
Click to expand...
So if we're just going to stick to this one claim for now, your evidence for it seems to be:
  • Hijackers might not have been able to get on the planes with boxcutters
  • Hijackers might not have been able to get on the planes with GPS units
  • The crew and passengers might have resisted
  • A 767 would have splatted on the side of a WTC tower without penetrating it

Are there any others? All of these points have been addressed here already, but if you feel any one is still unrefuted, please pick that one and let's sort it out before moving on.
 
malcolm kirkman said:
I die at the hands of a six stone weakling with shoulders like cotton, not really.
Click to expand...

What in the blue hell are you talking about ? Was that a racist slur ?

BTW, suppose they couldn't get in the cabin right away.
Click to expand...

Boy, you really do like speculatin'.

The pilot could have the plane on the ground in two minutes.
Click to expand...

Sure, land in a cornfield, maybe ?

Even an aenemic stewardess wouldn't bleed to death from a razor slash in that time span = end of hijack
Click to expand...

You obviously have never been in a life-threatening situation.

How can Rockefeller be sure?
Click to expand...

Well, since he doesn't have anything to do with this situation, I guess I just don't care.

No thanks, I only read factual books. I find fiction childish.
Click to expand...

How do you know it's fiction if you don't read it ?

How could you be sure the pilot wouldn't do that?
Click to expand...

That seems to be the gist of ALL your posts.

How could you be sure beforehand, how things would pan out.
The answer is you couldn't. You couldn't be sure.
Consequently no one would okay your plan.
Click to expand...

Wow. It's amazing anyone does anything, then, seeing as nothing is ever certain.

You would have to be sure if someone was going to OK your plan.
A plane had to hit the south tower, otherwise all the bombing prep would stand to get discovered etc.
Click to expand...

Ooohh... I see. So now you're jumping from the aircraft to the bombs in the WTC towers ? Is there ANYTHING about your posts that will contain facts and evidence and no speculation ? You seem bent on believing that 9/11 was an inside job. Why would you go looking for arguments and evidence if you already know what you want to believe ?
 
and this thread keeps on going....guys instead of answering this person, who has shown that he wont read what you post; just link to him previous replies on the topics he brings up. dont add any more commentary or repeat the same debunkings over and over again.

HE's not here to have a discussion. 128 posts in only 1 day; thats a record.
 
Last edited:
Belz... said:
What in the blue hell are you talking about ? Was that a racist slur ?



Boy, you really do like speculatin'.



Sure, land in a cornfield, maybe ?



You obviously have never been in a life-threatening situation.



Well, since he doesn't have anything to do with this situation, I guess I just don't care.



How do you know it's fiction if you don't read it ?



That seems to be the gist of ALL your posts.



Wow. It's amazing anyone does anything, then, seeing as nothing is ever certain.



Ooohh... I see. So now you're jumping from the aircraft to the bombs in the WTC towers ? Is there ANYTHING about your posts that will contain facts and evidence and no speculation ? You seem bent on believing that 9/11 was an inside job. Why would you go looking for arguments and evidence if you already know what you want to believe ?
Click to expand...
To overcome the MSM's obvious support for mass murder and to let neocons know that the tide is turning.
 
malcolm kirkman said:
To overcome the MSM's obvious support for mass murder and to let neocons know that the tide is turning.
Click to expand...
It's a good thing the tide is turning. I was sick of being stuck on the shoals. Maybe now, we can stop the reporters from shooting all the students just so they can report on stuff!
That is what you meant, isn't it?
 
malcolm kirkman said:
Turn on and tune in.
Click to expand...
Wow, are you a real hippie? That's so cool! Do you take acid? I take antacids, myself. But that's because all the beans we've been eating to make the gas to cook with give me indigestion. Did you know Timothy Leary? I heard he liked to tune on and turn in, too!
 
I am sure Shakespeare, Conrad, Hawthorne, etc... would love to hear that you find their works "childish". Your statement, in and of itself, is a childish one.

You are obviously a troll, and if it were not a slow week, we might grow bored with your old, debunked, ignorant claims, but, like a cat needing a ball of wool, I must be amused. While I find fiction far from childish, I am currently without a favorite book, so for now your posts will be my ball of wool.

TAM:)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom