• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

[Moderated]175 did NOT hit the South tower.

Status
Not open for further replies.
The Demon's Head said:
It will probably continued to be ignored.

If the evidence doesn't suit the theorists' contention, then it is most likely it will be ignored.
Click to expand...

excuse me for not paying you especial attention. I'll put that right, right now.
Your scenario involves the passengers compliance. What happens if I'm on board and I like to scrap?
 
malcolm kirkman said:
I sais I was a deckhand on a submarine.
It's called humour or humor to you.
Either way, you're sadly lacking in it.
Click to expand...
Yeah, I knew you were being cute. Just wanted to force you to admit it, since not everyone else would know you were trying to do that.
So, want to know my hijack scenario?


Do ya?



Well, do ya, punk?



Do ya feel lucky?
 
malcolm kirkman said:
excuse me for not paying you especial attention. I'll put that right, right now.
Your scenario involves the passengers compliance. What happens if I'm on board and I like to scrap?
Click to expand...

And you really think that you can take on four military trained guys all armed with knives, likely pepper sprays, and possibly claiming to have a bomb? Would you really fight and endanger the entire plane and crew? You would try and attack a guy with a knife to a stewardess' throat after he'd just told you that they had a bomb and if you sat down and behaved no one was going to get hurt? Wonderful heroism that.

However, it should be noted that the passangers on Flight 93 DID decide to fight back once they learned that if they didn't they were dead anyway.
 
malcolm kirkman said:
excuse me for not paying you especial attention. I'll put that right, right now.
Your scenario involves the passengers compliance. What happens if I'm on board and I like to scrap?
Click to expand...
See my post above.
Likelihood is --you die. They had no problem with killing themselves and lots of other people. one passenger isn't going to give them pause--and you death will quell the desire to resist among the other passengers, too.
 
malcolm kirkman said:
excuse me for not paying you especial attention. I'll put that right, right now.
Your scenario involves the passengers compliance. What happens if I'm on board and I like to scrap?
Click to expand...

Aww, Jeez! You're not really gonna come up with "I'd beat 'em to death with my luggage!", are you?

Let's see, now? What would happen if the passengers liked to scrap? I hesitate to bring it up, but does the word Shanksville give you a raging clue?

And how's about that remote controlled plane flying the passengers, all now conveniently re-boarded onto one single flight, and flown out to the Behring Sea? Why not the Caribbean? Why not the Arctic Ocean? How about the Bermuda Triangle? Surely you have a rational explanation for why it would be the Behring?

You're definitely in contention for the B-COAT prize. (Bats**t-craziest of all time.) Do you just sit there and think, "Hmmm? I don't think I've mentioned black boxes and custard pudding in the same paragraph, yet! I think I'll throw that in, next."
 
Well, much as I'd like to stay and play with you some more, you're getting boring, and I have to get to bed.

It's been lots of fun having you here! Really, even if you aren't very good at playing this game. Maybe later, when you get into Middle School, you can come back and try again.

Toodles, Baggy Eyes!
 
Foolmewunz said:
Aww, Jeez! You're not really gonna come up with "I'd beat 'em to death with my luggage!", are you?

Let's see, now? What would happen if the passengers liked to scrap? I hesitate to bring it up, but does the word Shanksville give you a raging clue?

And how's about that remote controlled plane flying the passengers, all now conveniently re-boarded onto one single flight, and flown out to the Behring Sea? Why not the Caribbean? Why not the Arctic Ocean? How about the Bermuda Triangle? Surely you have a rational explanation for why it would be the Behring?

You're definitely in contention for the B-COAT prize. (Bats**t-craziest of all time.) Do you just sit there and think, "Hmmm? I don't think I've mentioned black boxes and custard pudding in the same paragraph, yet! I think I'll throw that in, next."
Click to expand...
Heading for the Bering Sea, would keep the sun in the right place for a flight to the west coast.
 
Malcolm,

Are you really that...stund, that you cannot tell when someone is mocking you?

I could have said MENSA 456 for all I know or care about it. The last, and only official IQ test I took, was when I was 6 years old, and I scored 137. Not sure now if i would score better or not, although the silly online ones give me a rating of anywhere from 142 to 156...what ever that means.

JHC...

TAM:)
 
malcolm kirkman said:
Why couldn't the 175 passengers and crew been herded on to a remote controlled plane and flown off to somewhere like The Bering Sea?
Click to expand...
Why didn't any ATCs notice this happening? Why didn't UA notice that it wasn't flight 175 that crashed? Why didn't you bother actually reading what was in the post to which you replied?
 
rwguinn said:
See my post above.
Likelihood is --you die. They had no problem with killing themselves and lots of other people. one passenger isn't going to give them pause--and you death will quell the desire to resist among the other passengers, too.
Click to expand...
I die at the hands of a six stone weakling with shoulders like cotton, not really.
BTW, suppose they couldn't get in the cabin right away. The pilot could have the plane on the groung in two minutes. Even an aenemic stewardess wouldn't bleed to death from a razor slash in that time span = end of hijack = would Rockefeller go with your plan or mine?
 
PhantomWolf said:
So the B-52, the F-16, the F/A-18, the F-117A, the B-2, and the A-4 are obsolute? Oh, and the F-22!
Click to expand...


Well, I would consider the A4 obsolete...

But there's also the V-22 Osprey and F-35 Lightning II which would, by his definition, be obsolete.

-Gumboot
 
rwguinn said:
See my post above.
Likelihood is --you die. They had no problem with killing themselves and lots of other people. one passenger isn't going to give them pause--and you death will quell the desire to resist among the other passengers, too.
Click to expand...
I die at the hands of a six stone weakling with shoulders like cotton, not really.
BTW, suppose they couldn't get in the cabin right away. The pilot could have the plane on the ground in two minutes. Even an aenemic stewardess wouldn't bleed to death from a razor slash in that time span = end of hijack = would Rockefeller go with your plan or mine?
How can you be SURE nothing would go wrong?
How can Rockefeller be sure?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom