Jesus created Sex

Actually 'truthers' get banned by non truthers so that non truthers are in the majority and can form groups to harass other truthers from gaining more truths.

No offense guys and gals, but I was really hoping there would be one or two researchers HERE. Other boards have them but the vast majority HERE are into just denying rather than finding truths.

Has anyone HERE had any spiritual sexual experiences....

Or maybe we should study more Bruto-ian truths against Paulk and why the churchies deem sex unspiritual and sinful.
 
Oh, honey, your words don't merit offense.


Pity, perhaps. Derision, absolutely. But not offense. Never offense.
 
Actually 'truthers' get banned by non truthers so that non truthers are in the majority and can form groups to harass other truthers from gaining more truths.

No offense guys and gals, but I was really hoping there would be one or two researchers HERE. Other boards have them but the vast majority HERE are into just denying rather than finding truths.

Has anyone HERE had any spiritual sexual experiences....

Or maybe we should study more Bruto-ian truths against Paulk and why the churchies deem sex unspiritual and sinful.

See the issue here is that we do not deny sexuality, just that there is anything spiritual about it. This has nothing to do with our definition of sex or religion, just that there is no scientific evidence of anything ever being or ever having been spiritual in any way ever.
 
Actually 'truthers' get banned by non truthers so that non truthers are in the majority and can form groups to harass other truthers from gaining more truths.



You were banned for flagrant rule violations, not because of any belief you hold, half-baked or otherwise.

Now, do you have anything of substance you can say about the topic of this thread, you will you continue with the whining and taunting?
 
In truth, sex can be grunt and groan and not spiritual, as some of you are admitting. But just because you don;t go beyond, does not mean that there isn't more.

And just because, most of you believe you are just a piece of dirt and then you die and go back into more dirt, that theory of yours doesn;t make it true, as none of you have come back to testify to your dirtiness.

Its experience brethren and non brethren, you just have to get out more and EXPERIENCE life, and even sex. And find out for yourself that sex can be spiritual. But as I have been trying to get you to do, you have to go deep rather than shallow. You have to demand answers and truths, and put yourselves on the line with courage and guts. you have to extend yourselves to find out more and get more. You can;t be so lazy and reticent and fearful. Real sex and real love means you REALLY have to make an effort to become one, in more ways than just getting dirty.

Real love is not mere dirt, its spiritual.

And not just sex, it is UNION, when two become one. And that shows that more than two can also become one, for then you can have a glimse of the real heaven.
 
In truth, sex can be grunt and groan and not spiritual, as some of you are admitting. But just because you don;t go beyond, does not mean that there isn't more.

And just because, most of you believe you are just a piece of dirt and then you die and go back into more dirt, that theory of yours doesn;t make it true, as none of you have come back to testify to your dirtiness.

Its experience brethren and non brethren, you just have to get out more and EXPERIENCE life, and even sex. And find out for yourself that sex can be spiritual. But as I have been trying to get you to do, you have to go deep rather than shallow. You have to demand answers and truths, and put yourselves on the line with courage and guts. you have to extend yourselves to find out more and get more. You can;t be so lazy and reticent and fearful. Real sex and real love means you REALLY have to make an effort to become one, in more ways than just getting dirty.

Real love is not mere dirt, its spiritual.

And not just sex, it is UNION, when two become one. And that shows that more than two can also become one, for then you can have a glimse of the real heaven.


No, no one has come back to testify about dirtiness. That fits with the theory of dirtiness and actually lends support to it.

The fact that no one has come back your being spirity or in heaven does not fit well with the theory of being more than dirtiness. This also happens to be more of a support for dirtiness.
 
DJJ, you have stated that you believe Jesus created sex. You have provided no support for that assertion. We have no reason to discuss that.

You have provided no proof that the "spiritual" anything exists, so there is no reason for us to discuss your assertion of a "spiritual" part of sex.

Stop taunting. Stop insulting. If you want a discussion then you must present an actual argument for us to refute.

Otherwise this entire thread qualifies as TROLLING on your part.
 
Last edited:
The problem is, the accept DJJ's assertation we first have to accept:

1) there is a 'spiritual realiy beyond the physical'
2) a spiritual being created all existance
3) That being is the god described in the Bible
4) the Bible got it right
5) DJJ's interpritation of the Bible is correct
6) Jesus is the same eternal being as God
7) this perfect being chose sex as the means of reproduction
8) sex has some spiritual potential beyond just making babies or recreation
... and etc.

This is quite a lot of ground for people to cover before they agree with Mr. Jordan. Maybe he'd have more luck on a board full of folks who already accept the first few points

I'd also like to see Mr. Jordan answer the quiz someone posted a few pages back.
 
See the issue here is that we do not deny sexuality, just that there is anything spiritual about it. This has nothing to do with our definition of sex or religion, just that there is no scientific evidence of anything ever being or ever having been spiritual in any way ever.

Nah, its just because you are lazy and don;t study enough religion Student, for the mathematical design of our bodies shows that our energy culminates in the 33rd level at our pineal gland...our spiritual receptor and transmitter.

Do the math, or do the sex. Either way you com to the same conclusion. But you'll never know if you don;t do it.



http://www.geocities.com/davidjayjordan/33LevelstoEcstacy.html

http://www.geocities.com/davidjayjordan/GoldenSectionandyourBody.html
 
The problem is, the accept DJJ's assertation we first have to accept:

1) there is a 'spiritual realiy beyond the physical'
2) a spiritual being created all existance
3) That being is the god described in the Bible
4) the Bible got it right
5) DJJ's interpritation of the Bible is correct
6) Jesus is the same eternal being as God
7) this perfect being chose sex as the means of reproduction
8) sex has some spiritual potential beyond just making babies or recreation
... and etc.

This is quite a lot of ground for people to cover before they agree with Mr. Jordan. Maybe he'd have more luck on a board full of folks who already accept the first few points

I'd also like to see Mr. Jordan answer the quiz someone posted a few pages back.

No Mr streamjet, I'd have more luck with experienced people that are not afraid to ex[perience spiritual sexuality or real research.

It is a now a GIVEN that sex didn't creat itself, as those that have claimed it evolved magically and mysteriously through luck and chance are in hiding. .... probably way too embarassed to ever appear again.

Pity, they would have provided great comic entertainment.
 
So you want to know how sex could evolve? I think we should first start with the basics, and find out how much you already know. So, here is a simple quiz.

DJJ, please take this quiz so I can determine how best to address your question. I tried once earlier in this thread, but you demonstrated that you had no idea what I was talking about, so I want to make sure I don't go over your head again. Here we go:

1) Which chromosomal pair represents the human female gender, XX or XY?

2) Which of the following use sexual reproduction techniques:

Boa Constrictors
Tiger lilies
Humans
Puffball mushrooms
Ridley's sea turtles
Mildew
Portugese Man-O-War jellyfish
Maple trees
Very small rocks

3) How many sexes are represented in the natural world (1? 2? 3? More?)?

4) In the human reproductive cycle, which happens first, implantation or fertilization?

5) Which of the following exists mainly as a single-stranded molecule, RNA or DNA?

This isn't a complete quiz, but at least it gives me an idea of your level of understanding basic biology. I will address your evolution question once you have taken this quiz.

:popcorn1

OK, you're back. Let's see if you are willing to answer questions. Respond to this quiz please. You can click the link by my screen name to view the original.
 
Nah, its just because you are lazy and don;t study enough religion Student, for the mathematical design of our bodies shows that our energy culminates in the 33rd level at our pineal gland...our spiritual receptor and transmitter.

Do the math, or do the sex. Either way you com to the same conclusion. But you'll never know if you don;t do it.



http://www.geocities.com/davidjayjordan/33LevelstoEcstacy.html

http://www.geocities.com/davidjayjordan/GoldenSectionandyourBody.html

33rd level?? what kind of woo is that?
 
33rd level?? what kind of woo is that?

Student, to learn you must study NOT complain about a topic you have not read. It takes time and energy and concentration and an open mind. So rather than POST a one liner, take time to read and study and do the MATH. Know biology, study biology. Learn the design of the body, and build precept by precept truths so that you gain wisdom rather than negating all truths and being a deny-er. Don;t balk before starting just START.

Students these days are just so lazy..
 
It happens when you let your pineal gland join the Masons. Only you can stop the madness.

My grandfather was a mason, so maybe it could.

Other than that, I work in a hospitol (granted it is a vet hospitol), and I am unaware of anything but woo that speaks of numerical levels of energy etc.

I wish DJJ would explain where this comes from or site a source.
 

Back
Top Bottom