Jesus created Sex

streamlet said:
Thanks for the welcome!

I am a small mobile body of water that has come to this forum in hopes of getting better at having informed opinions and stating them clearly. I am fascinated by many forms of woo. The reason I'm on THIS thread is because I'm fascinated by DJJ. Never met someone like him and my inner author wants to figure out what he means. Hopefully I won't annoy anybody too much in my attempts at understanding!
Click to expand...

Most are too lazy to UNDERstand and therefore fall into foolishness and mockery. But true skeptics search for answers, and try and test concepts even sexuality, as you have to learn from experience and not be know it all's, deny it all's like most. experience, test, prove, get real and be an individual.

If you can't do that sexually, why allow others to think for you in other fields. It takes an OPEN MIND, to solve the myseries of life. But some accept the doctrines given them by their devoid governments as they are lazy and sloughtful.
 
Davidjayjordan said:
Most are too lazy to UNDERstand and therefore fall into foolishness and mockery. But true skeptics search for answers, and try and test concepts even sexuality, as you have to learn from experience and not be know it all's, deny it all's like most. experience, test, prove, get real and be an individual.

If you can't do that sexually, why allow others to think for you in other fields. It takes an OPEN MIND, to solve the myseries of life. But some accept the doctrines given them by their devoid governments as they are lazy and sloughtful.
Click to expand...

I would love to see this line of reason carried out by those studying life after death. "oh yes, you have to experience it to study it". The same goes for people studying cancer, aids, or any number of other things.

Its too bad we will never find a competent researcher for SIDS.
 
streamlet said:
Thanks for the welcome!

I am a small mobile body of water that has come to this forum in hopes of getting better at having informed opinions and stating them clearly. I am fascinated by many forms of woo. The reason I'm on THIS thread is because I'm fascinated by DJJ. Never met someone like him and my inner author wants to figure out what he means. Hopefully I won't annoy anybody too much in my attempts at understanding!
Click to expand...


bare in mind that that djj might be a failed cult-starter, recently expelled from ptolomæa of the ninth circle of hell for talking rubbish.
 
ReligionStudent said:
I would love to see this line of reason carried out by those studying life after death. "oh yes, you have to experience it to study it". The same goes for people studying cancer, aids, or any number of other things.

.
Click to expand...


Learn to live life without fear, and you won't have to be afraid of death. Or just go to the life-giver.

For similiarly what we are condemned for, is not what we could not have found out, but what we COULD HAVE FOUND OUT.
 
Macoy said:
bare in mind that that djj might be a failed cult-starter, recently expelled from ptolomæa of the ninth circle of hell for talking rubbish.
Click to expand...

Calling me a failed cult starter and saying I talk rubbish is surely against the *****.

Please try to be objective rather than subjective. Please attack the message rather than the messenger.

For it seems permissable to describe why lazy people fail to find truths, as a genral statement, but I would assume it would be inappropriate to call individual people by name as lazy, (as other posters did above.)

BACK TO JESUS AND SEX
 
Davidjayjordan said:
Calling me a failed cult starter and saying I talk rubbish is surely against the *****.
Click to expand...


I believe the word you were looking for is "rules". Calling someone a "failed cult starter" is certainly against the rules if it is merely a personal attack with no basis in fact. What case do we have here?

Please try to be objective rather than subjective. Please attack the message rather than the messenger.
Click to expand...


Here we have a basic problem. We have established that the messenger is a liar and a false profit (evidence available upon request), so what does that do for the message? We are told to believe the messenger's self-serving message, but he makes false statements; we are told to accept his prophecies, but they have a track record of failure.

So, to be objective, we must discount the messenger on its own merits, no?
 
Davidjayjordan said:
Calling me a failed cult starter and saying I talk rubbish is surely against the *****.

Please try to be objective rather than subjective. Please attack the message rather than the messenger.

For it seems permissable to describe why lazy people fail to find truths, as a genral statement, but I would assume it would be inappropriate to call individual people by name as lazy, (as other posters did above.)

BACK TO JESUS AND SEX
Click to expand...

Nothing in your posts has supported the incorrectness of what you have been called, indeed, the exact opposite is quite the case. In addition, the statements you seem to equate with messages have been overwhelmingly debunk and demonstrated to have no connection with reality, yet you continue to troll by repeating them without ever offering disproof of the complete evidence that they are incompetant, irrelevant and immaterial.
 
Davidjayjordan said:
Learn to live life without fear, and you won't have to be afraid of death. Or just go to the life-giver.

For similiarly what we are condemned for, is not what we could not have found out, but what we COULD HAVE FOUND OUT.
Click to expand...

Um that has nothing at all to do with my post, its just babble.
 
Hokulele said:
Most of DJJ's posts have nothing to do with any of our posts. They are all pretty much just babble. I just wait for the interesting babble.

HEY DJJ, WHAT ABOUT THE QUIZ YOU ARE AFRAID TO TAKE?
Click to expand...

Well, Hokulele, have you gotten anyone else to take your quiz? Maybe everybody's afraid to take it!
 
Post a link back to it (or post it again), and I will try my hand at it (though maybe I shouldn't DJJ might cheat.)
 
Ok, so I won't say you're a liar and you talk rubbish. I will say that what you utter is lies and rubbish. Perhaps your utterances are out of character or against your will or better judgment, or perhaps you're doing it as a joke.

Since it is indeed within the rules to remain anonymous, and not within the rules to "out" a person against his will, we have no way to know the real you, only the character, real or fictitious, under which you post. Who knows who or what you are, beyond what you tell us? So without impugning whatever person is sitting and pecking at your keyboard, I will simply mention that the character under which you post is a false prophet and a fool.

Better?
 
strathmeyer said:
Well, Hokulele, have you gotten anyone else to take your quiz? Maybe everybody's afraid to take it!
Click to expand...

ReligionStudent said:
Post a link back to it (or post it again), and I will try my hand at it (though maybe I shouldn't DJJ might cheat.)
Click to expand...

jsfisher said:
I'm afraid. She'd beat me if I got anything wrong.


No, wait.....What were the questions again?
Click to expand...

You are all a bunch of poopy-heads. :p

Fine, click here for a link back to the original quiz. BTW, if I made any errors in developing this quiz (and I certainly well may have), please correct them.

See? That is how True SkepticsTM operate.
 
Hokulele said:
So you want to know how sex could evolve? I think we should first start with the basics, and find out how much you already know. So, here is a simple quiz.

DJJ, please take this quiz so I can determine how best to address your question. I tried once earlier in this thread, but you demonstrated that you had no idea what I was talking about, so I want to make sure I don't go over your head again. Here we go:

1) Which chromosomal pair represents the human female gender, XX or XY?
Click to expand...
XX
2) Which of the following use sexual reproduction techniques:
Click to expand...
Boa Constrictors
Tiger lilies
Humans
Ridley's sea turtles
Portugese Man-O-War jellyfish
Maple trees

I am unsure of puffballs and mildew, but I believe they very well could.
3) How many sexes are represented in the natural world (1? 2? 3? More?)?
Click to expand...
I am unsure as to how to count, but I am pretty sure it would quite possibly be 3 or more, as some things have male, female, both, or neither
4) In the human reproductive cycle, which happens first, implantation or fertilization?
Click to expand...
Fertilization
5) Which of the following exists mainly as a single-stranded molecule, RNA or DNA?
Click to expand...
RNA
This isn't a complete quiz, but at least it gives me an idea of your level of understanding basic biology. I will address your evolution question once you have taken this quiz.

:popcorn1
Click to expand...
 
ReligionStudent said:
XX
Boa Constrictors
Tiger lilies
Humans
Ridley's sea turtles
Portugese Man-O-War jellyfish
Maple trees

I am unsure of puffballs and mildew, but I believe they very well could.
I am unsure as to how to count, but I am pretty sure it would quite possibly be 3 or more, as some things have male, female, both, or neither FertilizationRNA
Click to expand...

Bah, fine, give away the answers (or at least some of them, and you could have at least acknowledged the Monty Python reference). ;)
 
Last edited:
Hokulele said:
Most of DJJ's posts have nothing to do with any of our posts. They are all pretty much just babble. I just wait for the interesting babble.

HEY DJJ, WHAT ABOUT THE QUIZ YOU ARE AFRAID TO TAKE?
Click to expand...


Good grief, it all makes sense now!! DJ is a reincarnated ancient Babbleonanist!!:rolleyes: :jaw-dropp
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom