PS Audio Noise Harvester

In the future people will try things for themselves instead of read something a narrow-minded skeptic has written. People will get sick of reading what both sides of the fence say, so they try it and get it over with. Eventually most of the human population will be using the same audio tweaks as I have. And then people will do more experiments and they will find what to measure in the sound. When truth is in the open they go back to this thread and see I was right all along, and they will believe anything else I said and I don't even need to prove it. In 200 years my consciousness will be in an AI machine around Earth's orbit and I will receive all humans' thoughts because they trust me. Then the path to true understanding will begin.
 
ExtremeSkeptic said:
I will only make the test if it is made properly over a 1-2 year period. Entering a new environment with many new variables is just stupid. Skeptics don't know anything about athletic performance, they can never understand it because all they do is perceive it.

When I pass the test I will use up all the money to buy and give away Nordost Valhalla cable to all audiophiles
Click to expand...

You are not going to pass any test unless you can come up with a valid protocol for the test. You claim to be the expert so what do you suggest for the test protocol?

ETA: How long did it take you to notice the night and day differences when you made your tweaks?
 
Last edited:
ExtremeSkeptic said:
Skeptics don't know anything about athletic performance, they can never understand it because all they do is perceive it.
Click to expand...
How do you know what we do, I haven't seen you once, you had one person here that plays music and you just wrote him off, you just say anything.

Another question you will not know the answer too, is the ear more analog or digital.

Paul

:) :) :)
 
skep·tic–noun

1.a person who questions the validity or authenticity of something purporting to be factual.
2.a person who maintains a doubting attitude, as toward values, plans, statements, or the character of others.
3.a person who doubts the truth of a religion, esp. Christianity, or of important elements of it.
Click to expand...


Yep, you have no idea what the word means.

Paul

:) :) :)
 
ExtremeSkeptic said:
In the future people will try things for themselves instead of read something a narrow-minded skeptic has written. People will get sick of reading what both sides of the fence say, so they try it and get it over with. Eventually most of the human population will be using the same audio tweaks as I have. And then people will do more experiments and they will find what to measure in the sound. When truth is in the open they go back to this thread and see I was right all along, and they will believe anything else I said and I don't even need to prove it. In 200 years my consciousness will be in an AI machine around Earth's orbit and I will receive all humans' thoughts because they trust me. Then the path to true understanding will begin.
Click to expand...

Please see a mental health professional or get back on your meds.
 
Paulhoff said:
Your tweaks are all snake-oil, and they do cost you money (time is also money) and don't do a thing. You like many other audiophiles (and you are one) just have to play with something, so you tweak, you think it works, so you tweak some more, gee did it work or not, so you tweak some more, yea that works, so you tweak some more, and more and more.......etc. If it really worked then one or two tweaks and you would be done, but it doesn't work, so your always trying this and trying that, it never ends. My friend has been doing this tweaking BS for over 50 years and still he is tweaking and wasting time and money and is never happy, because it is all in his brain and it really isn’t there.

Paul

:) :) :)
Click to expand...
It's simple, your friend doesn't have enough intelligence to figure out how to improve the sound, he just makes random tweaks to trade one weakness into another. All those people do is sidestepping into another flavor. Eventually they will realize they haven't got anywhere and they will give up and sell their stuff.
Writing into logs and failing to understand them doesn't lead you anywhere. It's the same with skeptics and knowledge, they don't understand the knowledge they have read in books, they just repeat the knowledge. To really understand something you need to become it.

I know how to fix problems in the system and I keep getting better sound because of it. I don't do sidestepping because I don't like flavors, all I care about is more detail, more truth.
I have written many megabytes of logs over a year period and I know how to add it all together. If I didn't know how, I wouldn't be writing the logs because they would be a waste of time. I write logs in every sport I do because it makes me improve.
 
ExtremeSkeptic said:
It's simple, your friend doesn't have enough intelligence to figure out how to improve the sound, he just makes random tweaks to trade one weakness into another.
Click to expand...
Ha ha ha ha ha ha, you sound just like him, no different, none, none and none, he says the same thing, you are no different.

Paul

:) :) :)

I love it, a new generation, and they act like there is something new under the sun. OH and we know about sex too.
 
ExtremeSkeptic said:
I know how to fix problems in the system and I keep getting better sound because of it.
Click to expand...
No, you will later, may take some time, maybe months, but on more then that and you will go down another road of snake-oil, and lie to yourself some more. I've seen it so many times before, you as I have said are not new, you are like the all the rest.

Paul

:) :) :)
 
I think we could all use some meds. We know what the audiophiles want and could make millions selling them the crap. What we need is a pill to suppress our conscience so we can get on with becoming millionaires.

I'm reluctant to label ES as a troll. I don't think a troll would wrap his entire audio system in TP and post the pictures. And wouldn't a woo accept the challenge because they really believe what they say? Maybe there is a better label for ES. Suggestions are welcome.


ExtremeSkeptic said:
Yes, I have done all the blind test experiments and there are obvious differences if the audio system has high enough resolution to hear it.

I can hear a night and day difference between 60 and 78 microns silver plating depth (interconnects) and single vs dual threads wound around the conductor (power cord).
Click to expand...

You make your claims but when we offer to test them you run away and hide. Come out and face the skeptics or admit that your reality is a delusion.
 
I abandoned this thread ages ago.

I see ES is still spouting the same nonsense, almost verbatim. Come on people, it's a lost cause. Let him live in his fantasy world of rocks, crystals, ERS paper and useless tweaks.

I know exactly what ES will respond to this, the same thing he's been saying over and over: skeptics are deluded, who is having the placebo, knowledge is flawed, he knows the truth, etc etc..

*yawn*
 
osmosis said:
I abandoned this thread ages ago.

I see ES is still spouting the same nonsense, almost verbatim. Come on people, it's a lost cause. Let him live in his fantasy world of rocks, crystals, ERS paper and useless tweaks.

I know exactly what ES will respond to this, the same thing he's been saying over and over: skeptics are deluded, who is having the placebo, knowledge is flawed, he knows the truth, etc etc..

*yawn*
Click to expand...
That is really not the point, should Randi give up on Sylvia Browne, these posts I make are not for ExtremeUnknowing, it is for those on the fence. To just plan give up to all like him and letting the ignorant win. Join in with what you know to be true, don't let him win, are there is no point to this forum.

Paul

:) :) :)
 
ExtremeSkeptic said:
In the future people will try things for themselves instead of read something a narrow-minded skeptic has written. People will get sick of reading what both sides of the fence say, so they try it and get it over with.
Click to expand...
book-burn.jpg

And after this we burn of old people, they have nothing to tell us, what could they have learned......

Paul

:) :) :)
 
osmosis said:
I abandoned this thread ages ago.

I see ES is still spouting the same nonsense, almost verbatim. Come on people, it's a lost cause. Let him live in his fantasy world of rocks, crystals, ERS paper and useless tweaks.

I know exactly what ES will respond to this, the same thing he's been saying over and over: skeptics are deluded, who is having the placebo, knowledge is flawed, he knows the truth, etc etc..

*yawn*
Click to expand...
Skeptics are good at brainwashing other people into believing they don't need to try the tweaks for themselves because it doesn't make a difference. It's not hard to see who is delusional here.

I don't care if the one who tries the tweak doesn't hear a difference because of deafness, but at least they are trying it and finding out the truth on their own instead of being forced to hear flawed knowledge by skeptics who think they know it all.
 
Paulhoff said:
View attachment 6561

And after this we burn of old people, they have nothing to tell us, what could they have learned......

Paul

:) :) :)
Click to expand...
You don't know what life is all about. Instead of listening to flawed old stories from old people with memory loss, it's better to experience things on your own. You aren't going to understand it otherwire. Just because you repeat something an old ignorant narrow-minded man has told you doesn't make it the truth, and then you use his picture as your avatar. It's obvious that skeptics don't have a mind on their own, they are just automatically reading and repeating knowledge.
 
No, time and time again you post BS, I have written to show how things do work. You had posted about NASA using carbon fiber and I have shown you that it was because of weight and only for that reason that they used carbon fiber and not metal. Your testing is not double-blind. I told you I couldn't download the 40 plus minute of a so-called test of yours and you did nothing to change that. You're the one who says that books are on good, but you don't point out which ones, you just blanket them all. You discount my knowledge because it points out that you don't know what you are talking about. You wouldn’t studying because you say the book are flawed, how would you know without reading them and doing some real testing, you only use yourself and your woo-woo science. You don’t have a good foundation of knowledge about electronics and you show that time and time again on this thread. You also have no idea what the word skeptic means, I have posted a definition for you. It seems that people that are closed minded like you don’t just live on this side of the ocean.

Paul

:) :) :)
 
Last edited:
Dan O. said:
...
I'm reluctant to label ES as a troll. I don't think a troll would wrap his entire audio system in TP and post the pictures. And wouldn't a woo accept the challenge because they really believe what they say? Maybe there is a better label for ES. Suggestions are welcome.
Click to expand...

Audiofool? Or too obvious?
 

normal_ninjakitten.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom