• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Moon Hoax conspiracy

same as your source that they are different, little group called NASA, maybe youve heard of them?

you ever gonna get back to the van allen belts or shoudl we just call that debunked?


You really have been caught in a lie now....

Those two pics I posted are screen captures from videos, not photographs. LOL

So could I see a link to this source?
 
ERichardson:

There was no "faked moon landing." Not Apollo 11. Nor 12, 14, or 15. Also, Apollo 16 was real, as was the last, Apollo 17. None of them were faked, phony, or staged. Every possible anomoly or clue you might offer in support of that proposition has been countered endless times over the years; there is nothing new. Furthermore, there is no "smoking gun" or other bit of evidence you can muster.

Do you wish to engage in a discussion about your questions? Or are you here simply to display an ignornace that would get you failing grades in first year science class?
 
The "shattering body" thing sounds unlikely, though. One of my teachers did the old trick with the rubbergloved finger in liquid nitrogen, but that was a sausage. Try it with a larger piece, including a bone instead, and see what happens. I think you're unlikely to do much damage to it.

Good point, but if the suasage were dessicated. Like a dead tree branch vs. a live one.

Keep in mind, most experiments with Liquid N2 don't allow for really long term exposure. The implication was that the body was there for years.

Meh, this is morbid.
 
Yes, its the Jack White issue which Clavius covers at this link:

http://www.clavius.org/bigmt.html

No mixing of negatives, just deception by Jack White.

Make sure to reply to this so the coward can't ignore it.
thats not the hill he posted a picture of, but i did find a debunking of his hill (and i was a bit off)

Two video clips, claimed by NASA to have been taken at different locations many kilometers apart, show an identical hill.
There's an easy explanation for this: human error. The video clips to which the hoax advocates refer are from a documentary (not made by NASA) that accidentally used a wrong clip. This was a simple mistake, but not one made by NASA. According to NASA, the photos were actually taken about three minutes apart on the same hill.
http://www.braeunig.us/space/hoax.htm

was a mix up, just not NASAs mixup :)
 
You really have been caught in a lie now....

Those two pics I posted are screen captures from videos, not photographs. LOL

So could I see a link to this source?
was a caught in alie, or an error?

also, does that mean you were lying about the van allen belts?
 
You know, when I read the OP, I thought, "Oh, good! Someone who might be interested in learning something".

How wrong I was.
QFT.
It's sad, isn't it? I mean, there's all these interesting things to learn about space in general, once you stop just looking for talking points.
 
You really have been caught in a lie now....

Those two pics I posted are screen captures from videos, not photographs. LOL

So could I see a link to this source?


He´s right here, isn´t he? (or she)

ER, please get to the van allen belts before one of these guys explodes.

Have you seen Buzz Aldrin punch Bart Sibrel? It´s on youtube somewhere.
 
He´s right here, isn´t he? (or she)

ER, please get to the van allen belts before one of these guys explodes.

Have you seen Buzz Aldrin punch Bart Sibrel? It´s on youtube somewhere.

If you go to the link I had on page one of this thread, you not only can see the clip of Neil punching Bart, you can also hear him LYING about it.
 
Hey TROLL, how about the Van Allen belts?

In 1998, the Space Shuttle flew to one of its highest altitudes ever, three hundred and fifty miles, hundreds of miles below merely the beginning of the Van Allen Radiation Belts. Inside of their shielding, superior to that which the Apollo astronauts possessed, the shuttle astronauts reported being able to "see" the radiation with their eyes closed penetrating their shielding as well as the retinas of their closed eyes. For a dental x-ray on Earth which lasts 1/100th of a second we wear a 1/4 inch lead vest. Imagine what it would be like to endure several hours of radiation that you can see with your eyes closed from hundreds of miles away with 1/8 of an inch of aluminium shielding!

http://www.ufos-aliens.co.uk/cosmicapollo.html
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom