Jesus created Sex

I'm still wondering about how people in the old testament seemed to not only know about sex but also ENJOYED it based on DJJ's so far unproven theory about sex and Jesus.

I am also starting to wonder about the REAL reason Jesus are claimed to have said "Let the little children come to me" :eye-poppi
 
Paulhoff said:
I think someone was getting HOSED............ :rolleyes:

Paul

:) :) :)
Click to expand...

*SPEW!* And there goes another monitor!
I've heard it referred to as "Laying in Pipes" but that one was a first!


J. Arthur Hastur said:
I think any manner that you became involved would be adequately acceptable :D
Click to expand...

Don't get your hopes up. A I do, however, posses a camcorder. If you and RandFan are up to it, I think I know how we can make a bunch of dough.....
It involves you two in front of the camera, a church and a couple of ladies dressed up as nuns..........
 
The_Fire said:
*SPEW!* And there goes another monitor!
I've heard it referred to as "Laying in Pipes" but that one was a first!




Don't get your hopes up. A I do, however, posses a camcorder. If you and RandFan are up to it, I think I know how we can make a bunch of dough.....
It involves you two in front of the camera, a church and a couple of ladies dressed up as nuns..........
Click to expand...

Well, if that's what Jesus wants.......................
 
Davidjayjordan said:
in other words, you would throw away all pretense of following the rules of discussions, and get serious about further spamming my discussions with nonsense and foolishness, because you are frustrated and incapable of defending your claims or destroying mine.
Click to expand...

No, I am not 'spamming' your thread, I am trying to make you answer even one of the endless questions that have been asked of you. Either join in the discussion, or go away.

This absolutely shows you have lost the debate !!

Thanks for the confirmation.
Click to expand...

There never was a debate, David. For there to be a debate, you have to answer questions.

Will you address my post, please?

I'm still waiting for a response, David, or do you admit you are lying?

Here is a link to it, just in case you cannot find it yourself.
Click to expand...
 
Davidjayjordan said:
This absolutely shows you have lost the debate !!
Click to expand...


No, there was no debate (as has been pointed out to you repeatedly). This is how things have gone so far.

DJJ: Random verbiage.
Responder: "This is incorrect." Provides correction.
DJJ: Sticks fingers in ears.
Responder: Asks question.
DJJ: Random insult.
Responder: ??
DJJ: Back to random verbiage.

Nope, no debate there.

Have you ever suffered from a temporal lobe seizure?
 
Davidjayjordan said:
Now back to sex, as evolutionists can not explain how sex indepantantly developed and evolved within one gender. Or are they now saying that both genders evolved as the mating couple coupled, instaneously.

Please inform us, evolutionists, we have need of more lighter moments from you.

And I promise not to laught toooo much.

The floor is yours, and will probably put us all on the floor laughing afterwards.
Click to expand...

Sexual reproduction might very well have started at the single-cell stage, perhaps an incomplete split when a cell divided, or perhaps two cells that, for whatever reason, were able to exchange some kind of genetic material.

I don't know if it happened this way, but a good vector might have been a cell that mildly re-juggled its genetics on every split. "Mating" between cells could have been a completely separate development a billion years later.


These are three things that need not have happened all at once:

- Re-juggling the genes to get a variation in the child/split cells

- Development of mating between two organisms (which would have been androgenous anyway -- snails impregnate each other, they are both male and female)

- Development of differentiated sexes


However, one thing is certain: The re-juggling of genes with gentle variations on the organism's structures provides a mechanism to search the evolutionary gradient descent space magnitudes faster than just the random mutation due to radiation or chemical accidents.

In short, it exists and amplifies evolutionary concepts, instead of detracting from it.
 
Indeed, it has always impressed me that "re-juggling the genes" itself evolved -- how do you scramble the genes in such a way that the offspring is even mildly viable? It's an "intelligent" (note the quotes) partial scramble. The cellular mechanism recognized you could juggle this and that part just so and arms and legs are a little longer or shorter or thicker or thinner, but not too much so the head fails to grow or the arm is missing.
 
DJJ, those of us who have asked direct questions on the subject of this thread, in the context of this thread, have yet to see anything even remotely resembling an on-topic discussion. Why don't you stop being such a hypocrite about it, deflecting questions and addressing everything including your erroneous and high handed dismissal of other people's beliefs, irrelevant discussions of your erroneous interpretation of forum rules, and critiquing of avatars, and try to concentrate on the subject of this thread, which is your assertion about Jesus and sex, and the obvious question of whether it is coherent, and whether it is compatible with Christian principles. I say it is neither, and have addressed one question with regard to the latter repeatedly. Are you capable of answering it?
 
Let's be fair, DJJ isn't trying to win an argument or convert anyone. All he is doing is attempting to validate his position. The more he says it, the more HE is convinced it is true. He has no illusions about saving anyone, or that he is right he just needs reaction, good or bad, to validate his position. If he can't have positive supporters then nay sayers who are evil and are against work just as well to re-enforce his feeling of self-righteousness and martyrdom.

He's not convincing us, he's convincing himself. If he actually believed what he was saying, he wouldn't even be here for our opinions.
 
J. Arthur Hastur said:
Let's be fair, DJJ isn't trying to win an argument or convert anyone. All he is doing is attempting to validate his position. The more he says it, the more HE is convinced it is true. He has no illusions about saving anyone, or that he is right he just needs reaction, good or bad, to validate his position. If he can't have positive supporters then nay sayers who are evil and are against work just as well to re-enforce his feeling of self-righteousness and martyrdom.

He's not convincing us, he's convincing himself. If he actually believed what he was saying, he wouldn't even be here for our opinions.
Click to expand...

And, as long as he's here amusing us, he's not out bothering people in the real world.

Public service, I say. :cool:
 
The_Fire said:
I'm still wondering about how people in the old testament seemed to not only know about sex but also ENJOYED it based on DJJ's so far unproven theory about sex and Jesus.

I am also starting to wonder about the REAL reason Jesus are claimed to have said "Let the little children come to me" :eye-poppi
Click to expand...

Shame on you for suggesting such a vile thing.

The Lord is hardly impressed with your slandering of Him. I would suggest retracking it now.
 
J. Arthur Hastur said:
Let's be fair, DJJ isn't trying to win an argument or convert anyone. All he is doing is attempting to validate his position. The more he says it, the more HE is convinced it is true. He has no illusions about saving anyone, or that he is right he just needs reaction, good or bad, to validate his position. If he can't have positive supporters then nay sayers who are evil and are against work just as well to re-enforce his feeling of self-righteousness and martyrdom.

He's not convincing us, he's convincing himself. If he actually believed what he was saying, he wouldn't even be here for our opinions.
Click to expand...

Arthur at least you are sane rather than the replies of some of the others.

But NO, Arthur I need no validation from any HERE. People who have found truths, try to share them, that's called love. people without truths or without love try to share nothing and pull down everything.

As for self righteousness that's the athiests religion as they love only themselves and not even the other athiests that much. They relish in their self righteousness just like the scribes and pharisees.

Yet with the Lord, no one is righteous as we are all in the same boat and EQUAL. So there again, you have more fallicies, probably because you have only really studied and believed the religion of atheism.

Its one HELL of a religion, but people get what they want and what they deserve.

Your choice, your responsibility.

Now back to Jesus created Sex
 
Beerina said:
Indeed, it has always impressed me that "re-juggling the genes" itself evolved -- how do you scramble the genes in such a way that the offspring is even mildly viable? It's an "intelligent" (note the quotes) partial scramble. The cellular mechanism recognized you could juggle this and that part just so and arms and legs are a little longer or shorter or thicker or thinner, but not too much so the head fails to grow or the arm is missing.
Click to expand...

Only in the minds of a born again evolutionist do cells obtain divinity and thought and get choice, by choosing to juggler genes and continue to choose viability, as TWO different genders eveolve magically over the years and billions of years, with millions of magic recessive genes that HOCUS POCUS, eventually bring on new hormones and sex organs that supernaturially fit together perfectly.

Evolutionary religion is totally based on FAITH and HOPE in luck and chance.

Thanks for the laugh Beerina, I think you have had enough beer for now. You must sober up before posting again, if you are to be taken seriously.



IE Juggling is another term for throwing the dice of luck and chance....
 
Davidjayjordan said:
Only in the minds of a born again evolutionist do cells obtain divinity and thought and get choice, by choosing to juggler genes and continue to choose viability, as TWO different genders eveolve magically over the years and billions of years, with millions of magic recessive genes that HOCUS POCUS, eventually bring on new hormones and sex organs that supernaturially fit together perfectly.

Evolutionary religion is totally based on FAITH and HOPE in luck and chance.

Thanks for the laugh Beerina, I think you have had enough beer for now. You must sober up before posting again, if you are to be taken seriously.



IE Juggling is another term for throwing the dice of luck and chance....
Click to expand...

Oh look, the guy who altered the dates of his prophecies but has yet to explain it is lecturing us on science again.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom