Jesus created Sex

Simon, I can't post what happenned to another fellow who went way too far on line. As it might be deemed ********, but nevertheless it did happen, because he wrote things that you are now writing. for it is one thing to call me a pig and a devil and a demon, but when you call God a pig, you are going way tooo far.

You have superceeded his Mercy, so if I were you, I would EDIT out your remarks about God being a pig and a liar... Call me one ..... as the moderators allow that type of name calling, but the Lord doesn't when you call Him a pig.

Your choice. .... your responsibility

I was following your 'logic'.

But since you issued the challenge....

What's he going to do? Strike me do down? He wouldn't even do it save his own son, so I am going to take my chances.

God is rat bastard, who contridicts himself, supports murder, rape, genicide, infanticide and more. If I ever meant the **** I'm going to beat his brains in. Lying little pig.
 
Last edited:
Simon, I can't post what happenned to another fellow who went way too far on line. As it might be deemed ********, but nevertheless it did happen, because he wrote things that you are now writing. for it is one thing to call me a pig and a devil and a demon, but when you call God a pig, you are going way tooo far.

You have superceeded his Mercy, so if I were you, I would EDIT out your remarks about God being a pig and a liar... Call me one ..... as the moderators allow that type of name calling, but the Lord doesn't when you call Him a pig.

Your choice. .... your responsibility

Well how about this then: I do not say God is a pig and a liar. I do, however, say that the thing you consider as God is a pig and a liar (and worse). If you wish to consider yourself made in his image, I have no problem with that and will even stipulate this as one of the few assertions you have made which I will accept without debate. Your choice, and your responsibility.
 
I was following your 'logic'.

But since you issued the challenge....

What's he going to do? Strike me do down? He wouldn't even do it save his own son, so I am going to take my chances.

God is rat bastard, who contridicts himself, supports murder, rape, genicide, infanticide and more. If I ever meant the **** I'm going to beat his brains in. Lying little pig.

Your words.. your choice, your responsibility
 
Well how about this then: I do not say God is a pig and a liar. I do, however, say that the thing you consider as God is a pig and a liar (and worse). If you wish to consider yourself made in his image, I have no problem with that and will even stipulate this as one of the few assertions you have made which I will accept without debate. Your choice, and your responsibility.

You see bruto, I am teaching you something as you copy my wording... for when you repeat my phrase, your choice your responsibility, it is showing cause and effect, the scientific principle of the lord, where your choices determine your effects, and your future actions on you. reap what you sow type principler. So thanks for starting to understand this.
 
I deny the Holy Spirit.

So there.

I deny that Jesus created sex.

So there.

I deny that there is a heaven or hell.

So there.

The bible is just words of men and not of any god.

So there.

I am a happy blasphemer who does not need your petty religion or anyone else's.

With a hey nonny nonny and a ha cha cha.
 
I deny the Holy Spirit.

So there.

I deny that Jesus created sex.

So there.

I deny that there is a heaven or hell.

So there.

The bible is just words of men and not of any god.

So there.

I am a happy blasphemer who does not need your petty religion or anyone else's.

With a hey nonny nonny and a ha cha cha.
But you could be faking. :D

DR
 
Your words.. your choice, your responsibility

Well I am still here. No bolts of lightning. Maybe he got his revenge on me when I stubbed my toe last night. He isn't a very big man, this God of yours. He wants to strike me down because I call him a few names. You think a guy running an entire universe would more on his mind.
 
I think you've got that backward.

No Jesus was from the begining as he said, as he was divine, even if you deny that there is a Creator. As your religion teaches you that life created itself and magically supernaturially that sex also created itself by luck and chance.... but then again evolutionists and false skeptics love to gamble and place their bets on nothingness, and base their religious system on luck and chance.
 
Last edited:
Well I am still here. No bolts of lightning. Maybe he got his revenge on me when I stubbed my toe last night. He isn't a very big man, this God of yours. He wants to strike me down because I call him a few names. You think a guy running an entire universe would more on his mind.

Stupidity is a type of judgment the Lord uses, as people get stupider and stupider as they despense stupid comments and vile comments. And with their stupidity, the Lord can entice other stupid people to follow that stupid person... and so everyone gets what they deserve.

A true and just reward if that is what the Lord has chosen for them. Everyone gets what they deserve.....

http://www.geocities.com/davidjayjordan/Reapwhatyousow.html

or

http://www.geocities.com/davidjayjordan/Lordlovesjudgment.html



.
 
DJJ, go into your bathroom, there should be a mirror on the walk, look into to it, you will find you biggest adversary.

Paul

:) :) :)

Also, I will say it again, there is NO so-called god.............................
 
Stupidity is a type of judgment the Lord uses, as people get stupider and stupider as they despense stupid comments and vile comments. And with their stupidity, the Lord can entice other stupid people to follow that stupid person... and so everyone gets what they deserve.

A true and just reward if that is what the Lord has chosen for them. Everyone gets what they deserve.....

http://www.geocities.com/davidjayjordan/Reapwhatyousow.html

or

http://www.geocities.com/davidjayjordan/Lordlovesjudgment.html



.

You still haven't answered my question in link-free plain English (ignoring the evidence so far, I will credit you with the capacity to do so). If Jesus was Jesus from the start, what is being said, when Christians speak of Jesus as the son of Mary, linked by maternity to the house of David? When Christians characterize Jesus as "the word made flesh," what are they saying? The Biblical account is that Jesus was a man, born of a woman. Most Christians consider this distinction to be an important one. A specific, and unambiguous act of God: that Jesus's existence was a human one, his life a human one, and his death as genuine as any death could be. Without the true sacrifice of his death, and the miracle of resurrection, Christianity would be something else entirely. Jesus's spiritual essence or whatever you wish to call it, may have been there all along (must have been if you believe in the trinity), but if you believe in Jesus Christ, the man, the messiah who was predicted by the prophets (not seen by them on earth), the personality who lived on earth and died on the cross, then whatever it was that existed before Jesus the man was conceived and born cannot have been the man who was born, etc.

Can you respond to this without resorting to irrelevant quotes, rants and Jeremiads about nonbelievers, links to your web pages, or spurious nonsense? It's a specific issue, with no atheistic content. You bluster on about false skeptics and atheists, apparently determined to believe that nobody can disagree with you and be anything but a nihilist and atheist. My personal belief or lack of it is irrelevant, as always, to the question of whether your ideas are valid. I ask the question above without any atheistic or nihilistic twist. Whatever my personal faith or lack thereof, it can be taken as a simple Christian to Christian question. Can you answer it intelligently and intelligibly?
 
No Jesus was from the begining as he said, as he was divine, even if you deny that there is a Creator. As your religion teaches you that life created itself and magically supernaturially that sex also created itself by luck and chance.... but then again evolutionists and false skeptics love to gamble and place their bets on nothingness, and base their religious system on luck and chance.

Evolution is not a religion. Evolution is not dogma. Evolution by natural selection is not luck and chance. Evolution is fact. And if you would actually take time to learn about evolution by natural selection you would understand these things.

So, it is time for me to call YOU a false skeptic. You judge evolution without even learning what it is, without having even a basic understanding of it.

Your ignorance is showing.
 
No Jesus was from the begining as he said, as he was divine, even if you deny that there is a Creator. As your religion teaches you that life created itself and magically supernaturially that sex also created itself by luck and chance.... but then again evolutionists and false skeptics love to gamble and place their bets on nothingness, and base their religious system on luck and chance.
I guess the depends on what the meaning of "was" was. This is one thing I don't understand - faithy type folks are always making what are, essentially, empirical claims which are clearly empirically false or certainly can not and have never been demonstrated to be true. An example might be "Jesus lives!". Clearly, that is an empirical claim and clearly there has never been one shred of evidence to support that proposition. On the other hand if such a statement is not meant to be literally true - in what sense is it true? Jesus lives in your heart? What does that really mean? It means you feel a certain way, I guess, and you attribute that feeling to the idea that there once lived a person who claimed or had it claimed about him that he is the son of God - again, whatever that means.

Look, evolution is a fact. It would take some sort of supernatural intervention to prevent the formation of different species over the course of many millions of years. It couldn't not happen. There is no natural way to maintain the "integrity" of a genetic pool over vast periods of time. Mutations are unavoidable and certain % of those mutations would have to render an organism either more or less fit to survive and procreate. Eventually those mutations would have to result in the formation of a creature who no longer resembles the earlier creatures from which it evolved. There is no reasonable way to argue that hundreds of millions of years of cumulative mutation could result in anything other that the formation of new species. You would have to argue either that these mutations don't happen (which is absurd) or that the only mutations that do happen are "bad" mutations and only result in the formation of creatures who are less fit to survive and procreate. You can argue with Darwin's theory about the mechanisms of evolution (I happen to believe that Darwin was pretty damn dead on), but no rational person could argue that evolution does not happen (or that the earth is a few thousand years old.)
 
Sadly, kittens are just so damned expensive these days and, good lord, it takes a good 15 or 20 of them to get a decent half pound of liver.
 

Back
Top Bottom