Jesus created Sex

Where are the evolutionists that want to explain to their congregations how evolution evolved step by step with beneficial sexual mutations all miraculously combing at once by luck and chance to be able to reproduce without forming monsters.

The floor is yours evolutionists. Do state your theories HERE.
 
Davidjayjordan said:
Where are the evolutionists that want to explain to their congregations how evolution evolved step by step with beneficial sexual mutations all miraculously combing at once by luck and chance to be able to reproduce without forming monsters.
Click to expand...

Do read "The Blind Watchmaker" by Richard Dawkins. He shows that it's not quite the "luck and chance" that y'all make it out to be.

The floor is yours evolutionists. Do state your theories HERE.
Click to expand...

Wouldn't it be more pertinent to read from the experts first, before you start criticizing random people on message boards?
 
Davidjayjordan said:
Where are the evolutionists that want to explain to their congregations how evolution evolved step by step with beneficial sexual mutations all miraculously combing at once by luck and chance to be able to reproduce without forming monsters.
Click to expand...

You should know. Anyone who gets it THAT wrong probably hangs out with you.
 
Lonewulf said:
Do read "The Blind Watchmaker" by Richard Dawkins. He shows that it's not quite the "luck and chance" that y'all make it out to be.



Wouldn't it be more pertinent to read from the experts first, before you start criticizing random people on message boards?
Click to expand...

The experts are only those that are paid to agree with the doctrine and dogma of the Church of the Big Miracuolous Bang and so are paid researchers and there assumptions and conclusions are PAID in full by their masters and controllers...those in the white coats that force evolution dogma on our students.

So their luck and chance is the same as the luck and chance of most HERE. As I have to make sure I don;t say ALL because some have wisdom enough to realise that sex could not possibly have been evolving in different genders while at the same time reproducing successfully. that's insanity to the max...and so no one that I know of, would even suggest such an insanity. But go for it. That the topic of this thread.

The floor is yours, or call in your experts, or call in your big boys to try and prop up your case for evolutionary sexual development.

http://www.geocities.com/davidjayjordan/Evolutionisareligion.html
 
DJJ your ignorance is showing. Your prejudice is showing. Your lack of understanding of basic science is showing.

Evolution is not luck and chance. If you listened at all in school, and I know you didn't, you would understand that.

And now back to kitties
 

Attachments

  • 101_0174.jpg
    101_0174.jpg
    118 KB · Views: 1
Davidjayjordan said:
The ancients used it for humilating their enemies, and yet some unfortunately still use it today.

http://www.geocities.com/davidjayjordan/AnalSexisDirty.html

But the topic of this thread is who is the Creator of Sex, not what are the perversions of sex.
Click to expand...

The ancients invented buttsexs? Which ancients?

Davidjayjordan- I assure you that anal sex is only dirty if you use too much lubricant. If you use too much lube there is a sort of enema effect and the stuff gets everywhere. Of course, you don't want to use too little lube. You have to use the exact right amount of lube so that the anal sex isn't too dirty. Anyways, it seems you have a lot to learn on the subject but there's already enough educational materials out there on the interweb, so have fun!
 
simon dalton said:
If you are ever in Brisbane, I'll take you up on that offer :)
Click to expand...

I shall hold you to that, mate, if I am ever there. You never know. :D If you're ever in Dunedin I'll buy you a pint. :)

Oh, and for the record everyone, Zep was right. I'm out.

/me passes on the torch.
 
Kochanski said:
DJJ your ignorance is showing. Your prejudice is showing. Your lack of understanding of basic science is showing.

Evolution is not luck and chance. If you listened at all in school, and I know you didn't, you would understand that.

And now back to kitties
Click to expand...

Typical programed response, Koch. You don't know and so hope and pray one of your white coated priests named evolutionists willl know or understand and be able to explain your FAITH in luck and chance. And so the con of evolution goes on...
 
strathmeyer said:
The ancients invented buttsexs? Which ancients?
Davidjayjordan- I assure you that anal sex is only dirty if you use too much lubricant. If you use too much lube there is a sort of enema effect and the stuff gets everywhere. Of course, you don't want to use too little lube. You have to use the exact right amount of lube so that the anal sex isn't too dirty. Anyways, it seems you have a lot to learn on the subject but there's already enough educational materials out there on the interweb, so have fun!
Click to expand...

If you like it go for it... its dangerous to one's health biologically, and surely to their pysche as well.

Yet now, a great percentage of heterosexuals do it as well. Thier choice and their responsibility.

But then again, it is just a private sin usually, and there are much much more important matters like the conditions of one's heart and how they treat others.
 
Davidjayjordan said:
Typical programed response, Koch. You don't know and so hope and pray one of your white coated priests named evolutionists willl know or understand and be able to explain your FAITH in luck and chance. And so the con of evolution goes on...
Click to expand...

Do NOT abbreviate my alias, I am Kochanski.

I do understand evolution, unlike you. It is not luck and chance. It is not faith that drives my understanding of it, it is evidence from many different sciences. Evidence that gets stronger all the time.

The only con going on is the one in your brain.

Now, back to kittens and recipes. Anyone have anything new and interesting?
 
strathmeyer said:
The ancients invented buttsexs? Which ancients?

Davidjayjordan- I assure you that anal sex is only dirty if you use too much lubricant. If you use too much lube there is a sort of enema effect and the stuff gets everywhere. Of course, you don't want to use too little lube. You have to use the exact right amount of lube so that the anal sex isn't too dirty. Anyways, it seems you have a lot to learn on the subject but there's already enough educational materials out there on the interweb, so have fun!
Click to expand...

Aren't pre fun enema's also a way to clean it up?
 
Foster Zygote said:
...It seems to me that rejecting Christ is the only sin in Christianity. They say that a serial murderer will be punished in Hell for his crimes. But they also say that he will go to Heaven if he accepts Jesus on his death bed. So he isn't really going to Hell for his crimes against his fellow human beings but rather for not being Christian if he is "unsaved". In contrast, If his otherwise kind and generous victims were not born again Christians then they will go to Hell. Assuming the killer and his victims are all "unsaved" they will all be sent by God to Hell for eternity. Pretty crazy, huh?
Click to expand...
You use the blanket term 'in Christianity' at the start and indeed, some Christians would say that, but some Christians would also agree that such a scheme is crazy.
Actually, I would hope that if a Christian, who stated the above, was asked to unpack the 'accepts Jesus' bit he/she would say that it included an understanding that what they did was very wrong, expressed remorse, a desire to do right - that it actually involved a change of heart/a whole new approach to life. I think it would be too much to hope, though, that this fundy Christian would say that someone who hadn't 'turned to Jesus' might be with God/go to heaven etc etc.
 
Mr Clingford said:
You use the blanket term 'in Christianity' at the start and indeed, some Christians would say that, but some Christians would also agree that such a scheme is crazy.
Actually, I would hope that if a Christian, who stated the above, was asked to unpack the 'accepts Jesus' bit he/she would say that it included an understanding that what they did was very wrong, expressed remorse, a desire to do right - that it actually involved a change of heart/a whole new approach to life. I think it would be too much to hope, though, that this fundy Christian would say that someone who hadn't 'turned to Jesus' might be with God/go to heaven etc etc.
Click to expand...

You're correct to, uh, correct me.:blush: Although in my neck of the woods the common position among Christians is that only those who have accepted Christ's salvation will be taken into Heaven and everyone else, no matter how loving and compassionate toward their fellow humans, will be sent to Hell, I really don't mean to imply that all Christians hold this monolithic view.
 
Foster Zygote said:
You're correct to, uh, correct me.:blush: Although in my neck of the woods the common position among Christians is that only those who have accepted Christ's salvation will be taken into Heaven and everyone else, no matter how loving and compassionate toward their fellow humans, will be sent to Hell, I really don't mean to imply that all Christians hold this monolithic view.
Click to expand...

Tis true most real Christians believe in Grace rather than works, meaning that only Christ is good and perfect and only He gets us to Heaven or whatever terminlogy is used....

http://www.geocities.com/davidjayjordan/GraceNotWorks.html

As this way, anyone can make it, anyone.... it is just a matter of their hearts condition. Proud or Humble. The choice is always up to the individual as the individual chooses where they go.... not the Lord. They choose .... The Lord just makes it possible for them to make that choice....

As everyone gets what they deserve and want..

For when the Gentiles, which have not the law, do by nature the things contained in the law, these, having not the law, are a law unto themselves. Which shew the work of the law written in their hearts, their conscience also bearing witness, and [their] thoughts the mean while accusing or else excusing one another;)In the day when God shall judge the secrets of men by Jesus Christ Romans 2

So you see with or without the law, it is a matter of ones heart, as there are no secrets that shall not be revealed, even though false skeptics think there are no truths...

But this thread remains one..Jesus created sex from the BEGINNING.







http://www.geocities.com/davidjayjordan/SexualMysteries.html
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom