Israel responsible for the anthrax attacks

(...) One agent realized the addresses were in the same area as the Israeli spy ring they busted months ago. They feed the addresses of both groups into a computer and saw the pattern. Then they took this information to Carl Cameron with Fox News where his did a four part series in Dec. 2001 on the Israeli spy ring. The conclusion was the Israelis spies had the hijackers under surveillance but failed to inform Washington. 9/11 happened because Israel wanted it to happen.
http://antiwar.com/israeli-files.php

What "pattern" did emerge from the computer? A pentagram? A smilie?

And is it normal practice of FBI to take information to Fox News?

And if Israel did have the hijackers under surveillance, but failed to inform Washington, how does that make them "wanting it to happen"?

Like I have already said: You should be working in Hollywood
 
The conclusion was the Israelis spies had the hijackers under surveillance but failed to inform Washington.

"The" conclusion?

First you said the main stream media didn't report or investigate this story.
I just showed you you were wrong.
Now you're asserting a conclusion that that report didn't agree with was somehow "The" conclusion. That's idiotic.
 
You mean like the Washington Post reporting on the myth of the Israeli Art Student spy ring here?
http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/washing...06&desc=Reports+of+Israeli+Spy+Ring+Dismissed

Or is it just that when findings don't support your paranoid fantasies, they don't exist?

The government had to kill the story by claiming it was an "urban myth." This is how they kept reporters from pursuing the story. The top people at the FBI and CIA knew the Israelis had the hijackers under surveillance. I think they asked them to come into the country, follow the hijackers, and report what they were planning. The Israelis provided some basic reports but failed to inform Washington of their real intent.

The best article on the spy ring appeared in Salon.
http://dir.salon.com/story/news/feature/2002/05/07/students/index_np.html
 
And you proof is... they have anthrax.

Ladies and gentlemen: truther "reasoning", again.

Israel had the means, motive, and opportunity to have launched the anthrax attacks. They planned the anthrax attacks upon America for several years starting as early as 1997.
From
The Anthrax Mystery: Solved
http://www.anthraxattacks.net/

The planning for the anthrax attacks of 2001 goes back to at least 1997. In April of that year, the national headquarters of the Jewish organization B’nai B’rith in Washington, DC received a package that contained a petri dish labeled Anthracis Yersinia, implying the dish contained bacteria that could cause anthrax infections or plague. The dish had been broken and was leaking a red fluid. Tests later determined the petri dish to be relatively harmless, and it did not contain the bacteria Anthracis or Yersinia. However, it did contain Bacillus cereus, which is less dangerous and is sometimes used as an anthrax simulant.
A two-page typed letter accompanied the petri dish. The letter was largely incoherent and contained comments on Jews, Nazis, and the ‘Holocaust.’ The letter was signed, “The Counter Holocaust Lobbyists of Hillel.” Months prior to the B’nai B’rith hoax, a movement was forming on college campuses calling for a debate to question some assertions concerning the ‘Holocaust.’ Those responsible for the mailing chose to blame historical revisionists or so-called “Holocaust deniers.”
The B’nai B’rith hoax received a great deal of media attention. Television outlets like CNN and other networks broadcast the incident live to a national audience. The nearby area was evacuated, and for a period of time office personnel were quarantined. The case has never been solved, and the cost to the government was two million dollars.
Israel’s Mossad most likely was responsible for the mailing. The hoax benefited Israel and the Jews in several ways. First, national publicity was generated in this first major anthrax scare. Second, sympathy was elicited for the Jewish organization that was attacked. Third, the persons supposedly responsible—namely, those who have questions concerning the ‘Holocaust’—were demonized. However, on another level, something more important was achieved: This would be the first anthrax hoax used to implicate Dr. Steven Hatfill.

Dr. Hatfill was attending a terrorism seminar in Washington, DC the day the B’nai B’rith incident occurred. At the time, Hatfill was employed as a researcher at the National Institutes of Health where he likely had access to petri dishes containing bacteria. This, in all probability, was the reason a petri dish from a bioresearch lab was used this time, instead of a suspicious powder. This anthrax hoax, along with others that followed, would help to make a circumstantial case against Dr. Hatfill if a real anthrax attack ever occurred.
 

The best because it supports your paranoid world view?
You said the mainstream media ignored this story; it didn't. Because the main stream media didn't ignore it, right wing anti-semitic groups leapt on it, along with every other anti-semitic myth out there about 9/11, such as 4000 Israelis warned to avoid the World Trade Center. Sometimes the mainstream media reports things that turn out to have been rumours rather than anything real - as in the spy ring case. But your assertion they ignore them is false, and your acceptance of mainstream media when you can fit it into your paranoid world view and discarding it when it contradicts that, disingenuous.

What you haven't supplied is evidence.
 
What "pattern" did emerge from the computer? A pentagram? A smilie?

And is it normal practice of FBI to take information to Fox News?

And if Israel did have the hijackers under surveillance, but failed to inform Washington, how does that make them "wanting it to happen"?

Like I have already said: You should be working in Hollywood


The pattern was a correlation of addresses where they were in the same area as the hijackers.
They went to Fox News perhaps thinking they were the most patriotic of news outlets and would tell the story. The FBI did not trust the liberal media.

Israel wanted America to go to war with Israel's enemies.
 
Did they, now ?

And you know they believe it, because ... ?


Because...the FBI has changed their story about the investigation. In the past they were checking every possible bio-weapons lab in the world. They first discovered a "Soviet signature" in the anthrax since it was the best American experts had seen.
Now today, they claim the anthrax was nothing special and not weaponized. The FBI is now covering for the Israelis because it would be too much for the American people to know that Israel found out about the plans for 9/11 and then launched an attack upon this country with a bioweapon of mass destruction.
 
Are the Nuremburg trials still going on? Because I think I found a new defendant.
 
"The" conclusion?

First you said the main stream media didn't report or investigate this story.
I just showed you you were wrong.
Now you're asserting a conclusion that that report didn't agree with was somehow "The" conclusion. That's idiotic.

Carl Cameron reports on the FBI's conclusion "...how could they not have known?"

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article7545.htm

HUME: Carl, what about this question of advanced knowledge of what was going to happen on 9-11? How clear are investigators that some Israeli agents may have known something?

CAMERON: It's very explosive information, obviously, and there's a great deal of evidence that they say they have collected — none of it necessarily conclusive. It's more when they put it all together. A bigger question, they say, is how could they not have know? Almost a direct quote.
 
Yes, Cameron, Fox TV mainstream (of a kind) media again.
Looks like the mainstream media didn't have a problem reporting this stuff, really, doesn't it?

From your quote of Cameron:
It's very explosive information, obviously, and there's a great deal of evidence that they say they have collected

And where's the evidence?

none of it necessarily conclusive. It's more when they put it all together. A bigger question, they say, is how could they not have know? Almost a direct quote."

(My emphasis)
Oh. Dear.
 
Israel had the means, motive, and opportunity to have launched the anthrax attacks. They planned the anthrax attacks upon America for several years starting as early as 1997.
From
The Anthrax Mystery: Solved
http://www.anthraxattacks.net/
The planning for the anthrax attacks of 2001 goes back to at least 1997. In April of that year, the national headquarters of the Jewish organization B’nai B’rith in Washington, DC received a package that contained a petri dish labeled Anthracis Yersinia...
So your evidence that Israel started planning the attacks is that neo-nazi holocaust deniers mailed B'bai B'rith a hoax anthrax package?

Is every anti-semitic event in the world simply staged by the Jooos to garner sympathy?

What a strange world you must live in.
 
The best because it supports your paranoid world view?
You said the mainstream media ignored this story; it didn't. Because the main stream media didn't ignore it, right wing anti-semitic groups leapt on it, along with every other anti-semitic myth out there about 9/11, such as 4000 Israelis warned to avoid the World Trade Center. Sometimes the mainstream media reports things that turn out to have been rumours rather than anything real - as in the spy ring case. But your assertion they ignore them is false, and your acceptance of mainstream media when you can fit it into your paranoid world view and discarding it when it contradicts that, disingenuous.

What you haven't supplied is evidence.

The New York Times completely covered up the story. They said nothing at all. Most news organizations look to the NYT for a lead as to what to report. If they say nothing then other outlets will likely say nothing. The Washington Post–to the best of my knowledge–reported only the "urban myth" article. With the exception of Fox News no television news outlet reported the story–perhaps a small piece on CNN but nothing major.
The story of the Israeli Art Students has to be one of the most suppressed news stories in America.
 
The B'nai B'rith organisation is sent fake anthrax with an anti-semitic note and that's evidence for an Israeli conspiracy?

:wackywacko:
 
The New York Times completely covered up the story. They said nothing at all. Most news organizations look to the NYT for a lead as to what to report. If they say nothing then other outlets will likely say nothing. The Washington Post–to the best of my knowledge–reported only the "urban myth" article. With the exception of Fox News no television news outlet reported the story–perhaps a small piece on CNN but nothing major.
The story of the Israeli Art Students has to be one of the most suppressed news stories in America.
As you grow up, you'll find that most of the things in your imagination are not covered by news outlets. http://www.911myths.com/Israeli_Art_Students.pdf
 
So your evidence that Israel started planning the attacks is that neo-nazi holocaust deniers mailed B'bai B'rith a hoax anthrax package?

Is every anti-semitic event in the world simply staged by the Jooos to garner sympathy?

What a strange world you must live in.

Israel staged some anthrax hoaxes starting in 1997 in order to frame Dr. Hatfill.

Here is an article showing Dr. Hatfill in the area of the staged anthrax hoaxes.
http://www.ph.ucla.edu/epi/Bioter/messageanthrax.html
 
The B'nai B'rith organisation is sent fake anthrax with an anti-semitic note and that's evidence for an Israeli conspiracy?

:wackywacko:
Because it is a thing that happened, it is prima facie evidence of and Israeli conspiracy. Things that happen are a subset of Israeli conspiracies.
 

Back
Top Bottom