• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The Missiles at Ground Zero

stateofgrace,

The missile hit WTC 7 one or two seconds after the crash of flight 175. I saw the video taken by the local FOX TV cameraman. It was shown every where after 9/11 but is rarely seen today.
 
stateofgrace,

The missile hit WTC 7 one or two seconds after the crash of flight 175. I saw the video taken by the local FOX TV cameraman. It was shown every where after 9/11 but is rarely seen today.

Well,I never. :eye-poppi

Any chance of a link showing a missile hitting WTC 7?

Let me guess, it as disappeared.:rolleyes:
 
stateofgrace,

The missile hit WTC 7 one or two seconds after the crash of flight 175. I saw the video taken by the local FOX TV cameraman. It was shown every where after 9/11 but is rarely seen today.

It must be linked somewhere. Find it and prove your assertion.

Or you will risk becoming another Christophera who can't produce the documentary that shows the towers had concrete cores.
 
Last edited:
stateofgrace,

The missile hit WTC 7 one or two seconds after the crash of flight 175. I saw the video taken by the local FOX TV cameraman. It was shown every where after 9/11 but is rarely seen today.
Your claim that of the hundreds of video clips and thousands of still photos, only one captured this "missile," is not a reasonable one.

Perhaps you – as did a few people on 9/11 – are thinking that the smoke trails left by flight 175 debris came from a missile.

879045c406799be7b.jpg


Is that a reasonable explanation for the phenomenon you saw on video?
 
babazroni,
The large damage to the southern face of WTC 7 was caused by the missile and not the fall of WTC 1. The missile started the fires in WTC 7. A decision had to be made about the building. The fire department determined the building would likely fall at some point in time. If it fell on its own it would have fallen toward its weakest point--the southwest where debris from WTC 1 damaged the corner.

A national security demolition team would be needed to control the situation and secure all vital information in the building.
 
babazroni,
The large damage to the southern face of WTC 7 was caused by the missile and not the fall of WTC 1. The missile started the fires in WTC 7. A decision had to be made about the building. The fire department determined the building would likely fall at some point in time. If it fell on its own it would have fallen toward its weakest point--the southwest where debris from WTC 1 damaged the corner.

A national security demolition team would be needed to control the situation and secure all vital information in the building.

Is that so? Well, lets see some evidence for this. This oughta be good.
 
babazroni,
The large damage to the southern face of WTC 7 was caused by the missile and not the fall of WTC 1. The missile started the fires in WTC 7. A decision had to be made about the building. The fire department determined the building would likely fall at some point in time. If it fell on its own it would have fallen toward its weakest point--the southwest where debris from WTC 1 damaged the corner.

A national security demolition team would be needed to control the situation and secure all vital information in the building.

Are you suggesting that this "national security demolition team" wired a burning building for demolition in a matter of hours?
 
So... the government controls buildings like the Pentagon, NORAD etc but they choose to keep all this very top secret infomation in a privately owned office block in the heart of New York?

Really?
 
babazroni,
The large damage to the southern face of WTC 7 was caused by the missile and not the fall of WTC 1. The missile started the fires in WTC 7. A decision had to be made about the building. The fire department determined the building would likely fall at some point in time. If it fell on its own it would have fallen toward its weakest point--the southwest where debris from WTC 1 damaged the corner.

A national security demolition team would be needed to control the situation and secure all vital information in the building.

No evidence, no rational theory, no justification, no rational sequence of events.

You have a lot of nerve complaining about our critical thinking skills. Here's a hint: 'Critical thinking' does not mean 'come up with the most brain-dead, idiotic, hollywood-would-reject-it-as-too-freaking-unbelievable, ideas' just so you can show how you mistrust the government even more than the CTer next top you.
 
It really amazes me you people consider yourselves to be critical thinkers.

That would be because we are.

You simply accept what the government and media tells you and you think it to be true.

You have some nerve. We don't accept things just because the government tells us to, we accept things becuase experts, evidence, and the chain of events leads towards that conclusion.

Meanwhile, what do you give us? A load of horse-hockey that you came up with on a bender of paranoia juice and your homewritten version of 'My first book of Mix-n-match really stupid 911 conspiracy theories'.
 
From The Missiles at Ground Zero:
Other footage showing the missile explosion was taken by Jack Taliercio, a local Fox News cameraman. Taliercio was positioned in the plaza at the base of the North Tower and focused his camera on the burning building directly above him. In his video recording we see the second plane hitting the South Tower followed a few seconds later by an immense explosion on Taliercio's right near the vicinity of World Trade Center 6. WTC 6 was a seven-story building on the north side of WTC 1. The explosion sent debris flying in all directions. This footage was shown without explanation on news programs in the early days after 9/11, but is rarely seen today.
 
Are you suggesting that this "national security demolition team" wired a burning building for demolition in a matter of hours?

The entire WTC 7 was not on fire. The bottom floors may have been cleared of fire.
 
So... the government controls buildings like the Pentagon, NORAD etc but they choose to keep all this very top secret infomation in a privately owned office block in the heart of New York?

Really?


WTC 7 was the a national security building for NYC. Look at all the offices it held. You didn't know that?
 
The entire WTC 7 was not on fire. The bottom floors may have been cleared of fire.
Please address my post with the photo above. Is that a reasonable explanation for the phenomenon you saw?

Remember, thousands of cameras caught that phenomenon. Zero recorded a missile, although they had to have, according to you.

Remember also that several thousand people were in WTC 7 when the south tower was hit. A missile did not hit that building, and the massive damage done to WTC 7 was not done at that time. Those thousands of people – including some who post here – would have noticed that.

Are things becoming clearer now?
 
At first I thought that this may be the worst CT'er who has come calling so far. Invisible jets firing invisible missiles at skyscrapers to destroy secret information hidden in WT7 left me rolling on the floor laughing....that was until I read this top secret recording made in the white house on September 10th.

Unidentified Voice #1: Dick, I've been thinking....

Unidentified Voice #2: You know the Illuminati warned you about that sort of thing.

Unidentified Voice #1: No, no. This is important. You know all that top secret information we've been storing in the World Trade Center?

Unidentified Voice #2: We've been storing all our top secret information in a commercial building in New York?

Unidentified Voice #1: It seemed like a good place at the time. We can't let it get out. It details our top secret plan to steal oil by invading a country that doesn't have any, and then moving on to invade another country that does have oil, and then turning it over to their new government....

Unidentified Voice #2: Wait, you lost me. What's this plan again? How do we get this oil?

Unidentified Voice #1: Dick, I do my own plans sometimes. Laura thinks it's a hum dinger. Anyways, we need to destroy the papers. Here's my plan. We get two comercial airplanes, you see? Then we fly these airplanes into WTC1 and 2. At the same time we set off explosives in the lower portion to explode at the exact same minute the planes hit!

Unidentified Voice #2: Uhhhh...I thought the top secret documents were in WT7....and why can't we just shred the documents instead?

Unidentified Voice #1: Now, now. You're missing the most brilliant part. To destroy the documents in WT7, our real goal, I'm going to order a F16 to fire a sidewinder missile into one of the comercial airplanes. Now my plan is that they'll miss, and hit WT7 to bring down the building. Our document problems are solved!

Unidentified Voice #2: [long pause] My heart is beginning to hurt. If these towers fall down when a missile hits them, why do we need explosives? Won't people see the fighter craft? How do you even go about planting explosives in the world trade center to begin with?

Now, I'm not able to provide the link to this transcript. The page was taken down. It was, however, broadcast on Fox News back in 2002. It's just that nobody remembered it because it was a busy news day. Perhaps if you sheeple weren't so obsessed with news about Michael Jackson leaving the country you might have noticed it.

I, for one, would like to thank MaGZ for bringing this to our attention.
 
Last edited:
The entire WTC 7 was not on fire. The bottom floors may have been cleared of fire.

Stop the nonsense Magz, and answer the question.

When did this demolition force perform all of the necessary calculations for the demolition (taking into account the unbalanced loading caused by the 'missle'), locate the structural members, cut the sheetrock, place the explosives, and run the wires?
 
WTC 7 was the a national security building for NYC. Look at all the offices it held. You didn't know that?
Out of curiosity, and this isn't meant to be insulting: are you over 14 years old?
 
MaGZ:missiles::Christophera:concrete.

MaGZ, "rarely seen today" does NOT mean "does not exist". So, post a link to ths footage.
 
babazroni,

I think the government refused to admit to the controlled demolition of WTC 7 because of national security concerns surrounding the building. The remains of the building would have to be taken to a secret location and all sensitive information would be secured and removed.

Also the government probably feared the situation they have now, where some people think there was a government conspiracy to blowup all of the WTC buildings.

The very fact that MaGZ began his post with the pronoun 'I' strongly suggests that MaGZ speaks for MaGZ and no one else.
 

Back
Top Bottom