• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The Missiles at Ground Zero

The way to protect classified information and/or equipment is to maintain control over the area where it is stored.

Blow up WTC 7? Now you have to sift through all that rubble to get to the classified stuff. There is all that debris that make it hard to find stuff and makes it dangerous to just wander around. A lot of the classified stuff may not be recoverable has been damaged to varying degrees, or is floating around the area (not the site) having been blown clear during the collapse. Good luck accounting for it all. It is also hard to control a site where everything is scattered around and god knows where. You'd have to post guards, which would be pretty obvious, just to keep unauthorized folks from picking up a classified document or equipment or pieces thereof.

At least if WTC 7 was still standing, you can enlist the assistance of NYPD in securing the classified stuff. They'd be more than happy to help preserve national security. The building is more easier to secure and you know where the classified stuff is. No need to hunt around the rubble to find it.

So, again, why blow up WTC 7?

I think the above also sort of deals with the idea of demo teams on standby just to do things like blow up WTC 7. Hmmm, note that the demo team is intending to blow up the building not do a "controlled demolition". You destroy the secret stuff by setting the charges on it, not bring down the building hoping that the collapse destroys the secret stuff.
 
fezzic,

Remember the military was brought in the next day. Why bring in the military to Ground Zero if not to protect national secrets in the rubble of WTC 7?
 
MaGZ said:
fezzic,

Remember the military was brought in the next day. Why bring in the military to Ground Zero if not to protect national secrets in the rubble of WTC 7?
Click to expand...

To help with humanitarian efforts. That is the job of the national guard. They help deal with domestic disasters. Use your head please.
 
MaGZ said:
fezzic,

Remember the military was brought in the next day. Why bring in the military to Ground Zero if not to protect national secrets in the rubble of WTC 7?
Click to expand...

Still no facts just talk. Do you have something not as dumb as missiles and why are you unable to answer questions?

You are saying we in the military would cover this up? I think you have shown great disrespect to all in the military. I think you are disrespectful.

What do you say for your shallow research and lies?
 
beachnut said:
Still no facts just talk. Do you have something not as dumb as missiles and why are you unable to answer questions?

You are saying we in the military would cover this up? I think you have shown great disrespect to all in the military. I think you are disrespectful.

What do you say for your shallow research and lies?
Click to expand...

He is not thinking clearly. Magz are you saying that the military was ordered to protect GZ? From who? I am in the Army, no one was ordered to protect national secrets. You make me sick.
 
MaGZ said:
fezzic,

Remember the military was brought in the next day. Why bring in the military to Ground Zero if not to protect national secrets in the rubble of WTC 7?
Click to expand...

Or maybe because the US had suffered a massive and catastrophic disaster. Something unimaginable, something so dreadful that it actually required the help of everybody.
 
MAGZ

You are a nut case - several of my co-workers were in the DAMN BUILDING
(WTC 7) on morning of Sept 11. None of them report seeing a missile hit
the building or anything else like what you have described. My advice is
to crawl back under your rock you seig heil POS!
 
MaGZ said:
fezzic,

Remember the military was brought in the next day. Why bring in the military to Ground Zero if not to protect national secrets in the rubble of WTC 7?
Click to expand...


To help with rescue efforts? NYC just lost 300 of their FD and PD brethren that day.

and military guys do not protect "national" secrets

boy with every post you make; another ignorant comment spills forth.
 
A question for everyone.

What would the government do to protect national secrets in WTC 7?
 
one glaring problem i see is the time pate assumes an intercept would have taken

In an interview with ABC News (9/11/2002) Duffy said they flew at supersonic speed. At this rate they could have flown the distance from Otis to New York City in 10 to 12 minutes
Click to expand...
an F-15 top speed at low altitude is about 900mph, and its about 185 miles from Otis to manhattan, this comes out to 12.3 mins at top speed, so already pate is underestimating the time

however, 185 miles is a straight line distance, but the F-15s did not fly in a straight line, they went out over the water in order to fly supersonic (sonic booms over long island = not a good idea) i estimate the actual distance covered to be closer to 300 miles, or 20 minutes assuming top speed all the way
 
gumboot said:
I think this may be the stupidest thing I have ever heard.

Does he really expect us to believe that NORAD fighter pilots in command of F-15C Eagles actually MISSED hitting an airliner? Did the airliner pulls some evasive maneouvers? Maybe pop some chaff or a flare? Was the pod under the wings an ECM device?

-Gumboot
Click to expand...

The installation of an invisibility device on the missile required something to be removed to make room. So, they got rid of the tracking systems. So, while these Invisimissiles™ are invisible, they fly straight as an arrow.

Isn't it obvious?
 
Coritani said:
The installation of an invisibility device on the missile required something to be removed to make room. So, they got rid of the tracking systems. So, while these Invisimissiles™ are invisible, they fly straight as an arrow.

Isn't it obvious?
Click to expand...
makes sense too, if the target doesnt know the missile is coming he wont try to evade, so theres no need for the missil to track anything, lol
 
So, who would care to discuss the fact that Magz not only received questions from me (and avoided them with a reference rather than an answer) but he received more questions after that...

...but instead of answering them, because, he does know the truth, he changed the subject (yet again) and asked yet ANOTHER straw man question.

Maybe someone should explain what a "straw man" is. I don't think he knows.

Magz, I asked YOU to answer the questions. The burden of proof lies with you and only you. You came in and tried to change OUR minds.

So, I refer back to my original questions, they are simple "yes" or "no." questions. You know how to answer those, but it seems you wont.

I'm calling you out. Right now.
 
Last edited:
The military, both national guard (title 32) and active duty (title 10), can be used for civil emergencies. There are many things that the military can provide that civillian agencies may need to respond to a disaster. If you want to read the rules for how and when military assets can be used, see DOD directive 2035.1: Military Support for Civil Authorities. I work for an emergency management agency, and we use DOD assets all the time - even for smaller incidents, and none of the civil emergencies we have used them on have any national security significance.
 
MaGZ said:
A question for everyone.

What would the government do to protect national secrets in WTC 7?
Click to expand...

What nationals secrets are you talking about? The government had control of the building already. Who were they going to protect it from?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom