They do have a body... As well as DNA and trail cam pics.
They have reliable evidence.
And apparently they're nothing but fat chimps. Not a new species after all.
Evidence obtained at the tropical rainforests of Congo, a war-torn country. Am I supposed to think working at the PNW is harder than at Congo?
The main difference is there were scientists working there at all. The Bili Ape project got Dr. Sarmiento.
We have no full time field researchers.
A cyber friend told me NG had an article about a scientist travelling through much of Africa and finding no evidence for Bondo Apes at all. I wonder if he concluded they don't exist.
Where's the reliable evidence for bigfoot?
Most of it's in Dr. Meldrum's lab at ISU. You can throw out everything brought in by Freeman and Marx and still have enough evidence to warrant that full scale scientific investigation we haven't had yet.
Plaese, don´t waste time trying to sell
-Casts from Ivan Marx
Ivan Marx faked film. There's no evidence he faked casts. Some have held up to intense scrutiny. How likely is it he could have faked a condition consistant with
metatarsus adductus, or come up with a fingerprint on a Washington cast consistant with one found in Ft. Bragg, California (assuming tube is correct in it not having whorls)?
BTW, Cripplefoot's prints were seen again 5-6 years after Bossburg, twenty miles away.
-A film that may (quite probably is IMHO) be a hoax
And in nearly forty years has not been proved to be one. Why do sceptics so completely ignore those proportions?
Many impressions are indistinct. That's the nature of the substrate. There are also those that are quite clear.
-Casts that may be hoaxes or misidentifications
Of overlaid bear, deer scrapings or those silly Wallace wooden feet that wouldn't match the trackways if the toes
were movable?
What about the ones that a correct anatomically for a bipedal hominid having great weight?
Thousands of reports from reliable witnesses, many backed up by physical evidence. The most common, according to John Green's database, are of the animals near roads or crossing them, seen from cars. If that many people are suffering sleep paralysis behind the wheel, we have a major safety problem in this country. Why is it people who really do fall asleep behind the wheel don't seem to report Bigfoot sightings?
It would be interesting if they turned up, wouldn't it?
-A hand found at a dumpyard
Biscardi? You take him seriously?
The leading primate anatomist, after four examinations of the original, stated on National TV he's satisfied the imprint was not made by a coyote, deer, or elk, but Cliff Crook, a known hoaxer who's never seen the cast, and this man,
who's seen a copy, say it is and that's good enough for you?
-Interpretation of myths
as reliable.
Point me to a study that shows North Americans copped Native myths and are now going around seeing mythological beings in forests and near rivers and occasionally on farms across the continent.
Native interpretations of native traditions among the Coastal Tribes would seem to indicate they're considered real animals with special powers as go-betweens because of the manlike shape, but real animals nonetheless.
They are usually portrayed whistling, a sound that's been reported often.
The whites evidently decided ravens, coyotes, whales and wolves are real animals, but giant hairy hominids must be myths because such creatures can't exist.
Modern sightings by First Nations people are like sightings by whites.
I'm surprised you don't apply the same critical standards to sceptics' arguments that you use on those of proponents.
Tube refers to the use of "Virgin Volcanic Ash" in some of his most recent tests - although I can not find a supplier of such an item in the State of Washington or Oregon... This seems puzzling to me. 
