• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Zionism= World Domination???

Thunder

Banned
Joined
Nov 18, 2006
Messages
34,918
Im not sure if this has been debated before but I thought with all this stuff about the Holocaust and various accusations about Israel and 9-11, it would be good to get this out in the open.

I have read in various places, that one of the goals of Zionism is at the very least, control of the Middle East and the destruction of Muslems/Arabs...and at the most..Zionism is bent on total world domination.

As a Jew who went to Hebrew school, I find it hard to see how anyone could have such rediculous beliefs. Jews have lived in Palestine (Israel/Judea) for the last 3,000 years. After 2,000 years of exile, persecution, pogrom, and genocide, we decided enough is enough and its time to make our own way in our own land. I have never, ever, read any writings by any Zionist leaders or thinkers who have stated that Israel is but a stepping stone to global world domination...or even domination of the Middle East. There have however been crackpots who wanted to conquer all the lands of ancient Israel, which includes small parts of Jordan and Egypt...but conquer the whole Middle East?...please.

What I would like to know is....do those of you who have these crazy ideas...have any actual quotes? Can you site any articles, speeches, lectures, given by prominent Zionists to back up your claims?

I mean..if Israel wanted to rule the Middle East..they would have NOT pulled out of the Sinai and Gaza. They would NOT have made a peace treaty with Jordan. They would NOT have secret talks with the Palestinians.

Zionism and world domination?..Sorry...it just doesn't add up.
 
Im not sure if this has been debated before but I thought with all this stuff about the Holocaust and various accusations about Israel and 9-11, it would be good to get this out in the open.

I have read in various places, that one of the goals of Zionism is at the very least, control of the Middle East and the destruction of Muslems/Arabs...and at the most..Zionism is bent on total world domination.

As a Jew who went to Hebrew school, I find it hard to see how anyone could have such rediculous beliefs. Jews have lived in Palestine (Israel/Judea) for the last 3,000 years. After 2,000 years of exile, persecution, pogrom, and genocide, we decided enough is enough and its time to make our own way in our own land. I have never, ever, read any writings by any Zionist leaders or thinkers who have stated that Israel is but a stepping stone to global world domination...or even domination of the Middle East. There have however been crackpots who wanted to conquer all the lands of ancient Israel, which includes small parts of Jordan and Egypt...but conquer the whole Middle East?...please.

What I would like to know is....do those of you who have these crazy ideas...have any actual quotes? Can you site any articles, speeches, lectures, given by prominent Zionists to back up your claims?

I mean..if Israel wanted to rule the Middle East..they would have NOT pulled out of the Sinai and Gaza. They would NOT have made a peace treaty with Jordan. They would NOT have secret talks with the Palestinians.

Zionism and world domination?..Sorry...it just doesn't add up.


If you are prepared to cut the world domination stuff, and that Israel is behind 9-11, I am happy to engage in a debate with you on the Palestinian Israel issue.
Yes, I am 911 truther, but few of us believes Israel is behind it.

My opinion is that the Jews have no rights whatsoever to Palestine. It belongs to the Palestinians. So it is stolen land.
Time for me to hit the bed, continue later.:)
 
well, as an enlightened Jew, I can entertain the argument that a Jew from Russia or Ethiopia or India doesnt really have the right to displace a local Bedouin or Arab Palestinian.

But on the flip side, what gives you the right to live in the USA? This land was stolen from the natives...as was Canada...as was Australia. If Israel should pack up and leave..shouldnt these other countries aswell?

The best solution to the Israel/Palestine conflict..is compromise. The Geneva Accords is one of those compromises. Neither side gets everything they want...but both sides get what they need.
 
I think those CTists who talk about Zionism being behind the conspiracy have a Protocols of the Elders of Zion idea of secret cabals and suchlike. Here's something I posted about this subject before:

One of the many strands of CT thought that I don't understand is where Zionism fits in with the whole New World Order business.

It sort of makes (warped) sense if Zionists=Jews=International Bankers (and possibly Communist Masons and Satanists as well). But, even then, if the Jooos are the secret rulers of the world (or are at least trying to be) what use is Israel to them? It doesn't seem to have much by the way of resources or strategic value. Also, it's a predominantly Jewish state out in the open with international diplomacy and a free press and everything. Surely everybody knows that Jooos only do things in secret? And, given that, aren't they better off staying in the most powerful nations in the world, infiltrating and stuff?

But, we're told, Zionist doesn't mean Jew: in fact not all Jews are Zionists (although people who go on about Zionists only ever seem to be worried about the Jewish ones). No, a Zionist is someone who believes in the pernicious state of Israel, the only state in the history of the world to have been founded as the result of conflict - breaking the age-old tradition of harmony, peace and reasonable behaviour in the self-determination of peoples and the establishment of nation states.

However, even if we are extreme enough to accept the existence of the state of Israel in any form as unequivocally a bad thing (and I know I'm straying into politics a bit here), how does that make it a stepping stone for world domination? If the Zionists are the NWO, what use is Israel to them in controlling our lives? If the NWO plot doesn't rely on Israel, why blame the Zionists? Why blather on about "fighting wars for Israel"?

There is one answer: the Zionists are Satanists and they need Israel restoring to its Biblical state so that the Antichrist(s) will do something nifty (possibly involving plate glass and the handbrake of a truck). Unfortunately, the only people who definitely believe in this prophecy are a bunch of crazy evangelicals who really want it to happen because it means the rapture and all those nasty people who dare to enjoy their lives being left behind (ha!).

Bit of a conflict of interest for your CrazyFundieTruther there...

Of course some amateur psychologist may well speculate about all this Zionism talk just showing a desire for an other to fear, hate and ultimately destroy - a fantasy demon to distract from the world. Yes, but the father of Psychology was well known as a Jew (sorry, Freudian slip) as a Zionist.
 
zionist conspiracy theories and discussions regarding them fit quite well in a conspiracy theory forum, dont you think?
 
zionist conspiracy theories and discussions regarding them fit quite well in a conspiracy theory forum, dont you think?

Perhaps. I just thought it was a little off topic.

If not, then mea culpa.
 
I mean..if Israel wanted to rule the Middle East..they would have NOT pulled out of the Sinai and Gaza. They would NOT have made a peace treaty with Jordan. They would NOT have secret talks with the Palestinians.

Zionism and world domination?..Sorry...it just doesn't add up.

I don't know about world domination, but the simple fact that Israel doesn't rule the entire Middle East is pretty much proof positive that they don't want to. Because if they did want to, no one else in the Middle East could stop them. I mean, when has Israel ever lost a war, no matter what the odds were against them?

Despite all the talk of driving Israel into the sea, if push came to shove, I'd put my money on Israel driving everyone else out....
 
I think that the idea of Israel controlling the Middle East comes from so-called "Christian Zionism", which is based on an interpretation of the Book of Revelations in which Jesus will return after Israel rules the Tigris-Euphrates region (the area in which the Garden of Eden supposedly was). American millenialists have always interpreted the bad guys in the Book of Revelations to refer to whomever the US was having trouble with. In the 1930's, it was Japan. In the 1950's and 60's, it was the USSR. Now it's the subset of Muslims who aren't cooperative with Western interests.
 
I don't know about world domination, but the simple fact that Israel doesn't rule the entire Middle East is pretty much proof positive that they don't want to. Because if they did want to, no one else in the Middle East could stop them. I mean, when has Israel ever lost a war, no matter what the odds were against them?

Despite all the talk of driving Israel into the sea, if push came to shove, I'd put my money on Israel driving everyone else out....

When has Israel ever lost a war? Try last year in Lebanon. Their invasion destroyed a lot of property, killed a lot of people, and made Hezbollah's popularity skyrocket. A resounding success.

If that's the kind of victory they have against one faction in one little country like Lebanon, then, conspiracy or no conspiracy, they have *zero* chance of conquering the whole middle east.

Then there's the ongoing colonial war against the Palestinians. The ethnic cleansing is proceeding at an excruciatingly slow pace, so they might win this one in a few hundred years.... if:

* The Israeli populace has the stomach for it.
* The demographics don't change so that a democratic government of Israel will be Arabic.
* The US doesn't go the way of the Soviet Union.
* The Iraq situation doesn't turn the whole region into a warzone.
* No new technology gives terrorists enough of an edge to force a stalemate.
* The world political situation doesn't change too much.

Whether they want to conquer the whole region... well... certainly their crackpots do, and their crackpots tend to be overrepresented in their government, so...

On a tangent, imagine if enough people there renounced their incompatible imaginary friends and chose to live in peace... now *there's* an unlikely scenario. The world needs some atheist missionaries.
 
When has Israel ever lost a war? Try last year in Lebanon.
You may want to check your facts again, heck, why not have a look at a few quotes from the morons in hisbulla who kicked the whole event off because even they realise they f7cked up when they antagonised Israel in to attacking them.

Maybe open your eyes because not everyone sees hisbulla as being the best thing since sliced bread...people do realise the sh1t these morons have created at the expense of your average lebanese, because lets face it if hisbulla REALLY was interested in the welfare of the lebanese they wouldnt be antagonising and carrying out terrorists attacks would they?

Then there's the ongoing colonial war against the Palestinians. The ethnic cleansing is proceeding at an excruciatingly slow pace

Oh for f8cks sake...what ethnic clensing? IF these mythical people were being "ethnically" cleaned then why are they still in Gaza? Why do they still have large tracks of land around Jewish settlements?

* The Israeli populace has the stomach for it.
The Israelis have the stomach for it. The soft ones are those who live outside of Israel and refuse to see the reality of the situation but instead blame Israel for every ill under the sun :mad:

* The demographics don't change so that a democratic government of Israel will be Arabic.
Wont change, then again Israel already has Muslim members of Parliament who take an active role in the running of the Government. Cant say the same about any "Arabic" government can you?

* No new technology gives terrorists enough of an edge to force a stalemate.
Wont happen because both Iran and Syria know what would happen if they passed on new technology that could change the political landscape of the area.
* The world political situation doesn't change too much.
Hisbulla, hamas and all the other muslim terrorist groups rely on the world political situation staying the same (ie. anti-Israel) because if the worlds political opinion changed to one of support for Israel I can guarantee you that the "palestinian" problem would go away over night.

Whether they want to conquer the whole region... well... certainly their crackpots do, and their crackpots tend to be overrepresented in their government, so...
Bullsh1t, show me where the Israeli Government has openly declared they will destroy countries? Show me where the Israeli Government has declared they want to rule the middle east?

Come on...and Im not talking about crackpots...Im talking about the Government? Show me ANYTHING similar to that moron in Iran who talks daily of wiping Israel off the face of the planet.

On a tangent, imagine if enough people there renounced their incompatible imaginary friends and chose to live in peace... now *there's* an unlikely scenario. The world needs some atheist missionaries.
As long as there are people in the Arab world who see benefit in having an unstable middle east this will never happen.

The Palestinian problem could be over tomorrow if the arab world stopped supporting terrorism. The problem could go away if palestinians stopped detonating in public places. The Palestinians have so much more to gain economically, socially, culturally if they put down their arms and became friends with Israel, its as simple as that.

But as long as there are people in Tehran and co, who benefit from instability AND sponsoring terrorism around the world then this wont change.

BTW, it always amuses me when people talk about the historical right Palestinians have to those areas of Israel they now live in...but when you consider it was the Romans that established Palestinia and that the palestinians then have absolutely no ties to the palestinians today.

And lets not forget the role Egypt, Syria, Jordan have played in using the Palestinians as their political play thing over the years.

Mailman
 
OK if we are going to discuss the rights and wrongs of the Isreal's conflicts with other nations then somebody should request that this be moved into politics.

I'm more interested in the conspiracy theorist idea of Zionism as a force for world domination and the secret power behind 9/11.
 
Last edited:
If some of my response below seems abusive, forgive me. I'm just matching your tone.

You may want to check your facts again, heck, why not have a look at a few quotes from the morons in hisbulla who kicked the whole event off because even they realise they f7cked up when they antagonised Israel in to attacking them.

Israel's stated objectives, before the invasion, were to rescue the two kidnapped soldiers, and to militarily cripple Hezbollah. They achieved neither. Defeat.

What they did do was kill somewhere between 250 (if you believe Hezbollah) and 600 (if you believe the IDF) guerillas, and destroy a lot of civillian infrastructure. This inconveniences Hezbollah, badly hurts a lot of south Lebanese civillians, and makes the IDF look like brutes to most of the world.

The IDF took considerable losses, considering the technological disparity. More than 50 soldiers dead, more than 10 tanks destroyed. That was in just that short engagement. The post I replied to implied that Israel could conquer the whole region if they were so inclined. No way. Not with that rate of attrition.

Maybe open your eyes because not everyone sees hisbulla as being the best thing since sliced bread...people do realise the sh1t these morons have created at the expense of your average lebanese, because lets face it if hisbulla REALLY was interested in the welfare of the lebanese they wouldnt be antagonising and carrying out terrorists attacks would they?

I am not a Hezbollah or Israel supporter. I don't doubt that Hezbollah provoked the whole thing for selfish reasons. Even the Hezbollah leader has admitted he made a big mistake.

Oh for f8cks sake...what ethnic clensing? IF these mythical people were being "ethnically" cleaned then why are they still in Gaza? Why do they still have large tracks of land around Jewish settlements?

The ethnic cleansing referred to by almost every Israeli prime minister ever. My first google search turned up http://www.monabaker.com/quotes.htm and it would be easy to find many, many more examples. Googling for Israeli PM quotes is the fastest way to convince yourself that ethnic cleansing has taken place.

What ethnic cleansing, indeed.

The Israelis have the stomach for it. The soft ones are those who live outside of Israel and refuse to see the reality of the situation but instead blame Israel for every ill under the sun :mad:

They have the stomach for it now. My opinion is that this could change in the future. Just an opinion, though.

Wont change, then again Israel already has Muslim members of Parliament who take an active role in the running of the Government. Cant say the same about any "Arabic" government can you?

The percentage of the population that is Jewish has been slowly but steadily declining pretty much since the founding of the state. The change will barely be noticed over a 5 year period, but over 50 years, it will be huge. Unless the Jewish birthrate turns around, or they expel non-Jews, maths tells us that eventually Jews will be a minority in Israel. That's not including the occupied territories.

Wont happen because both Iran and Syria know what would happen if they passed on new technology that could change the political landscape of the area.

Both Iran and Syria are still funneling weapons to Hezbollah. Some of the rockets Hezbollah fired in 2006 were Iranian designs. They've been doing it for decades. So, whatever was going to happen, already has.

Hisbulla, hamas and all the other muslim terrorist groups rely on the world political situation staying the same (ie. anti-Israel) because if the worlds political opinion changed to one of support for Israel I can guarantee you that the "palestinian" problem would go away over night.

The US is backing Israel for whatever reason (there's one for CT's). US support is what makes or breaks Israel on the world political stage. I see two possible changes that would alter Israel's political fortunes. One, the US decides Israel is no longer useful and withdraws it's support. Two, US power declines to the point where their support is no big deal.

Bullsh1t, show me where the Israeli Government has openly declared they will destroy countries? Show me where the Israeli Government has declared they want to rule the middle east?

Who said anything about destroying? Have a look at what some of the Israeli leaders have said throughout history. It mostly revolves around the "necessity" of kicking Arabs out of the lands they want to claim for themselves. Some of them were honest, greedy bastards, who talk about expelling Arabs 'cos they're taking up prime real estate. Some were religous nutcases who honestly believe God told them to take Arab lands.

Come on...and Im not talking about crackpots...Im talking about the Government? Show me ANYTHING similar to that moron in Iran who talks daily of wiping Israel off the face of the planet.

Once again, google for some quotes by Israeli leaders. You don't need to go beyond Ben-Gurion to get some real cold-blooded doozies, but every Israeli leader has said some pretty callous things about Arabs.

As long as there are people in the Arab world who see benefit in having an unstable middle east this will never happen.

The Palestinian problem could be over tomorrow if the arab world stopped supporting terrorism. The problem could go away if palestinians stopped detonating in public places. The Palestinians have so much more to gain economically, socially, culturally if they put down their arms and became friends with Israel, its as simple as that.

But as long as there are people in Tehran and co, who benefit from instability AND sponsoring terrorism around the world then this wont change.

Ah, the good old blame game... not something I really want to venture into. Nobody has clean hands in the middle east, you can cherry-pick your history to paint anyone as villain or victim. If only X did what Y wants them to do the whole problem would be solved... wow, that's some real insight you've got there.

BTW, it always amuses me when people talk about the historical right Palestinians have to those areas of Israel they now live in...but when you consider it was the Romans that established Palestinia and that the palestinians then have absolutely no ties to the palestinians today.

It nauseates me when people feel the need to go that far back in history to determine who has a rightful claim to the place. Living there for more than a generation or two is claim enough.

And lets not forget the role Egypt, Syria, Jordan have played in using the Palestinians as their political play thing over the years.

Hardly needs mentioning. Everyone tramples over the poor bastards for their own ends, is it any wonder they're resorting to desperate tactics?

Anyway, just had to knock down the notion that Israel could possibly conquer the middle east, since they haven't even managed to grab all of Palestine yet. I don't want to spend too much time educating jingoists, however. They have trouble absorbing facts they don't want to hear.

Now, to get back to conspiracy theories, and I hope this is the only bit that gets replies: I think the high level of US support for Israel is contrary to America's best interests... so why do they do it?
 
The last intelligence estimate I heard was that Israel had between 800 and 1,000 nuclear weapons. They don't publicly admit this, though, which begs the question, why not? Why not say "OK, we have nukes, and we want you all to leave us alone. If you don't, Tehran or Baghdad or Damascus or Cairo or Amman or Beirut will be glowing like a movie marquee in 24 hours. That is all."

If Israel wanted to dominate Middle Eastern politics, they would. Obviously, they don't want to.
 
Zionism in the context of paranoid conspiracism

OK if we are going to discuss the rights and wrongs of the Isreal's conflicts with other nations then somebody should request that this be moved into politics.

I'm more interested in the conspiracy theorist idea of Zionism as a force for world domination and the secret power behind 9/11.

Hear, hear.

What I've observed in the spewings of 9/11 cranks and in surfing Indymedia sites in search of something to get my blood pressure up to going-to-work-and-contending-with-idiots level is that the word "Zionist" seems to have much the same function for the thoroughly modern paranoid conspiracist that "Communist" did for those earlier masters of political paranoia, the Birchers.

First, it provides something no proper paranoid can do without- an enemy, preferably an abstraction which can be reified into a preternaturally powerful evil Other which has extended its tentacles into all parts of society, where they can be seen only by the paranoid initiate. It creates a handy demarcation between Us and Them for the benefit of black/white thinking.

Second, it provides an off-the-rack ready-made explanation for all and any political or social conflicts, in a way that provides for the instant dismissal of any uncomfortable thoughts that they might provoke.

Why, black people would be prefectly happy riding in the back of the bus, well away from the polls, if it weren't for those !@#$ Communists stirring them up to weaken Our society and take it over.

Workers wouldn't be joining unions and striking over wages and conditions if it weren't for those @$#% Communist agitators trying to undermine Our society and take it over.

The Middle East would be a garden flowing with milk and honey if it weren't for those @#$% Zionists messing everything up to further their plans for world domination.

There would be no unrest in the Muslim world to spill over into Our lives, irrespective of any religious, economic or political issues, if it weren't for those @#$% Zionists controlling our media, economy and governmental policies to undermine Our society and take it over.

There's no need to think about present conditions, their historical roots or their moral implications, nor to try to bring practical problem-solving skills to bear. We can't have that; it's got to be someone else's fault- Their fault. If We devote Ourselves to rooting out Them and destroying Their power We can solve all Our problems without having to think about the details of how We got here and where it's possible to go.

Third, it serves as a club to wield against opponents. Is someone advocating ideas that don't fit into your ideology or refuting your claims with pesky facts? Just call them a [fill in the blank]ist and presto! You've absolved yourself of any need to consider ideas or evidence on their own merits and magically pre-rejected whatever your interlocuter might say in the future. You can also demand that since so-and-so has been identified as one of Them, they should be deprived of all opportunity to speak. (This works like a charm on certain Indymedia sites, where the editors consider enforcing ideological conformity their primary duty.)

Perhaps someone more knowledgeable than myself could examine the apparent parallels between the paranoid style Hofstadter looked at back in the '60s and old-fashioned "Protocols of Zion"-style historical anti-Semitism and how, with "Zionist" replacing "Communist" as the bogeyman of choice, the paranoid style has come around in a circle.
 
The last intelligence estimate I heard was that Israel had between 800 and 1,000 nuclear weapons. They don't publicly admit this, though, which begs the question, why not? Why not say "OK, we have nukes, and we want you all to leave us alone. If you don't, Tehran or Baghdad or Damascus or Cairo or Amman or Beirut will be glowing like a movie marquee in 24 hours. That is all."

If Israel wanted to dominate Middle Eastern politics, they would. Obviously, they don't want to.

Then the nuclear NPT wouldn't be worth the paper it was printed on.
Everyone within nuking distance of Israel would have no choice but to shut up and work like crazy on their own nuclear deterrent. They'd be completely justified in doing so. I don't think Israel really wants that.

If they let off those nukes, the fallout would poison Israel itself, and they'd be surrounded by a wasteland full of pissed-off mutants with dirty-bomb material at hand. No winners in that scenario.
 
Here's another thing I've noticed about the use of the word "Zionism" in CT literature. This may be a bit contentious, but it's on-topic and I think it needs to be said.

Zionism gives the conspiracy theorists a way to blame everything on the Jews, without actually blaming everything on the Jews.

If the word "Zionist" couldn't exist in CT literature, the fundamental bigotry of CT literature would be obvious. Blaming everything on "Zionists" instead of "Jews" gives the CTs a convenient fallback position when allegations of anti-Semitism arise: "I'm not anti-Jewish, I'm anti-Zionist!" Yeah, sure, buddy.

This is a well-known tactic of bigots. Instead of attacking an ethnic group, create an arbitrary subgroup, give them an unflattering name, and pretend that all your venom is about only that subgroup. I'm sure you can think of other examples.

The problem with isolating this usage is that the word has so many other meanings in CT-speak, as ktesibios eloquently explains. Not to mention its myriad real-world meanings. The word "Zionism" (note that I did not say "the concept of Zionism") permeates and dominates CT thinking. Conspiracy theory without Zionism is like psychology without Freud. You can agree or disagree with its role, but you can't ignore it, or isolate its influence.
 
Then the nuclear NPT wouldn't be worth the paper it was printed on.
Everyone within nuking distance of Israel would have no choice but to shut up and work like crazy on their own nuclear deterrent. They'd be completely justified in doing so. I don't think Israel really wants that.

If they let off those nukes, the fallout would poison Israel itself, and they'd be surrounded by a wasteland full of pissed-off mutants with dirty-bomb material at hand. No winners in that scenario.

What makes you think the NPT is worth the paper it's printed on anyway? Everyone and their dog is trying to get nukes. North Korea, Iran, Pakistan, and God knows who else.

The reason the Israeli nuke option isn't on the table is world public opinion. If Saddam had launched a chemical or biological attack against Israel, Baghdad would have been eight inches high and glowing. And the world would have, if not condoned it, at least tolerated it.

Iran won't get nukes because the Israelis won't permit it. They'll do what they have to do before the Iranians get to the point of being a nuclear power. We've seen that before.

Israel is surrounded by a sea of Arabic sworn enemies. The hatred goes back 2,000 years. It didn't start in 1948. I'm not surprised that the Israelis feel the need to defend themselves with whatever means are at their disposal.
 

Back
Top Bottom