• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Common Sense

Oliver said:
It´s called IFS ... the "Ignore Function Syndrome" :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

It's also a two way street.

I think 28K has exhausted his entertainment potential and is now just playing like a broken record.

If he changes his ways and actually starts to listen and learn, I trust someone will point this out and I would be happy to remove him from ignoreland.

But for now I have no interest in seeing anything he types.
 
uk_dave said:
It's also a two way street.

I think 28K has exhausted his entertainment potential and is now just playing like a broken record.

If he changes his ways and actually starts to listen and learn, I trust someone will point this out and I would be happy to remove him from ignoreland.

But for now I have no interest in seeing anything he types.
Click to expand...

And this rascal actually thinks he´s entertaining... :rolleyes:
 
uk_dave said:
Are you saying that 28K deleted his cocked up calculation and posted a disclaimer?

If so, he just outed himself as a blatant and stupid liar. :mad:
Click to expand...

Yup, thats what I'm saying. He did. Got caught with his pants down and went back and tried to erase the evidence. Instead of, as he likes to say, be a man and at least admit his mistakes.
 
Skibum said:
28IQ said:
I didn't say that... they're making this crap up.
Click to expand...

This is what he changed it to.
Click to expand...

And this the original:

28IQ said:
I was going off of freefall times that someone else came up with. According to this video, freefall for steel beams a certain size would be 4.7 seconds over the distance of 100 meters.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=Ml_n5gJgQ_U

So we divide 100 meters into the height of WTC 2 (415m) We get 4.15.

4.15 X 4.7 = 19.505 seconds.
Click to expand...
 
I think that sort of editing should at least recieve a warning from the mods.

Just my opinion, not up to me to tell them how to moderate, their sand pit etc etc.
 
28th Kingdom said:
You all know I've got the goods... and that is why you all bail out of the debate and start hurling insults... classic stuff really.
Click to expand...

Chalmers: Oh my god your kitchen is on fire!
Skinner: No it isn't
Chalmers: What was that then?
Skinner: Umm the Aurora Borealis.
Chalmers: The aurora borealis? At this time of year? In this part of the country? Localized to your kitchen?
Skinner: ... Yes.
Chalmers: Can I see it?

Oh if I was only off his ignore list so I could pose that same question to 28th...
 
Curnir said:
Chalmers: Oh my god your kitchen is on fire!
Skinner: No it isn't
Chalmers: What was that then?
Skinner: Umm the Aurora Borealis.
Chalmers: The aurora borealis? At this time of year? In this part of the country? Localized to your kitchen?
Skinner: ... Yes.
Chalmers: Can I see it?

Oh if I was only off his ignore list so I could pose that same question to 28th...
Click to expand...

The Simpsons has a quote for everything.
 
I was going off of freefall times that someone else came up with. According to this video, freefall for steel beams a certain size would be 4.7 seconds over the distance of 100 meters.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=Ml_n5gJgQ_U

So we divide 100 meters into the height of WTC 2 (415m) We get 4.15.

4.15 X 4.7 = 19.505 seconds.
Click to expand...


So the terminal velocity of a steel beam is only some 21.3m/s ?

Like, doh!
 
Originally Posted by 28th Kingdom
I was going off of freefall times that someone else came up with. According to this video, freefall for flat steel beams would be 5.6 seconds over the distance of 100 meters.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=Ml_n5gJgQ_U

So we divide 100 meters into the height of WTC 2 (415m) We get 4.15.

4.15 X 5.6 = 23.24 seconds.
Click to expand...

How many versions are there?
 
28th Kingdom said:
So a 110 building...takes 2-3 more seconds to fall than an object that is hurling unimpeded and unobstructed through the air... and you think this bodes well for you.

What about good ole WTC 7 which did fall at freefall:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=Ml_n5gJgQ_U

DOH!
Click to expand...

Come on. Show your calculations for how long WTC7 should have taken to collapse. You can use an upper section and a lower section and adjust either depending on where you think the collapse began, show us how much resistance the lower section should have provided.

I was going off of freefall times that someone else came up with. According to this video, freefall for flat steel beams would be 5.6 seconds over the distance of 100 meters.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=Ml_n5gJgQ_U

So we divide 100 meters into the height of WTC 2 (415m) We get 4.15.

4.15 X 5.6 = 23.24 seconds.
Click to expand...

:eek:

This is hilarious. And quite sad, too.
 
Last edited:
uk_dave said:
Are you saying that 28K deleted his cocked up calculation and posted a disclaimer?
Click to expand...

Disclaimer? Nope, he's a true "Truth Seeker." He posted a denial. Savor the irony.
 
H'ethetheth said:
Hehehehe!
All this fighting against Uncle Sam and then pulling a truely Orwellian feat of redaction.

Brilliant!
Click to expand...

Well as we have said before, your average woowoo is very capable of committing the very acts which they accuse others of.

Certainly 28K is a liar and is prepared to attempt a cover-up. Hardly surprising then that his limited imagination allows him to accuse the US govt of the same thing on 9/11.

Except that they're better at it than he is. ;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom