• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

This is the thread that may very well change the way you look at 9/11 FOREVER!

28th Kingdom said:
Finally...we agree on something. You're right 9/11 couldn't have been an excuse to invade Iraq. But, that's exactly what the government used it for.
Click to expand...

No, non compliance with UN resolutions regarding WMD were the reasons for the attack on Iraq, based upon dodgy intel suggesting that the weapons existed.

Any link between Iraq and AQ was claimed after the afghanistan invasion and AFTER Iraq was found to be clean of WMD.

In just the same way that constructing a democracy in the mid-east was also used as an excuse after the event.

Tell me, how's that working out?
 
Once again:

28th -

What would falsify your theory of controlled demolition? What would constitute evidence that would, to you, strongly contradict if not conclusively disprove your thermite theory?
 
28th Kingdom said:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DYqLA4X6dQ4

In the past, Rumsfield has said...that Flight 93 was brought down by the passengers. So Rummy is on record as saying this:

Flight 93 was shot down....and Flight 93 wasn't shot down.

Doublethink. These are our leaders.
Click to expand...

No, thats's not doublethink. He misspoke. Simple as that.

Furthermore, there would've been no reason to deny shooting the plane down.....they fully admit thats what they were trying to do.
 
28th Kingdom said:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DYqLA4X6dQ4

In the past, Rumsfield has said...that Flight 93 was brought down by the passengers. So Rummy is on record as saying this:

Flight 93 was shot down....and Flight 93 wasn't shot down.

Doublethink. These are our leaders.
Click to expand...
the bureau of transportation statistics cannot be trusted because they are a government agency, but their records proove flights 11 and 77 didnt exist

rumsfeld cannot be trusted because he planned 9/11, but he was telling the truth when he said 93 was shot down

norad was stood down on 9/11, but maanaged to shoot down flight 93 anyway, even though they had no planes in the area

bush cannot be trusted because he helped plan 9/11, but he was telling the truth when he said hes trying to connect iqaq to the war on terror

28th kingdom is doing this out of respect for the victims, but he denies the 246 passengers and crew on the 4 planes ever existed

28th kingdom accuses everyone around him of doublethink, but resorts to it himself constantly
 
28th Kingdom said:
The logical assumption is that NORAD shot down the plane over PENN. USG attacked NYC, Pentagon...and Rumsfield had a Freudian slip.
Click to expand...

Why would the U.S. government, who attacked NY and Pentagon, shoot down a plane that was going to attack NY or Washington?

Oh I get it. That flight was not hijacked. The US just needed a little more carnage to justify war.
 
babazaroni said:
Why would the U.S. government, who attacked NY and Pentagon, shoot down a plane that was going to attack NY or Washington?

Oh I get it. That flight was not hijacked. The US just needed a little more carnage to justify war.
Click to expand...
because NORAD is somehow separate from the monolithic and all-encompassing and all-controlling US government, capable of acting on their own and without to orders to shoot down civilian aircraft

but when they say they didnt they are part of the US government and cant be trusted



ah, doublethink to the rescue again ;)
 
well i have been up all night researching this, and i have to say, im sorry
i have found irrefutable evidence on youtube that 28th is indeed right, about everything. his perfectly logical analysis of the chain of events can be summed up thusly

prepare to have your minds blown people, we are through the looking glass here:

 
apathoid said:
No, thats's not doublethink. He misspoke. Simple as that.

Furthermore, there would've been no reason to deny shooting the plane down.....they fully admit thats what they were trying to do.
Click to expand...

To defend someone who has committed undeniable Doublethink (as in, he's on record as saying two contradictory things about the same event) ...is to engage directly in Doublethink yourself.
 
28th Kingdom said:
To defend someone who has committed undeniable Doublethink (as in, he's on record as saying two contradictory things about the same event) ...is to engage directly in Doublethink yourself.
Click to expand...
larry silverstein participated in the 9/11 attacks to scam money from his insurers, but now 5 years later he is billions of dollars in debt and yet to turn a profit

the world trade center was brought down by explosives that didnt make a sound, assisted by thermite that was not affected by gravity

flight 93 was supposed to hit wtc7 (a very unlikely terrorist target) despite the fact that it was flying in the direction of washington

all involved are criminal masterminds who ramdomly slip up during casual conversation and confess everything
 
Karl Johannes said:
well i have been up all night researching this, and i have to say, im sorry
i have found irrefutable evidence on youtube that 28th is indeed right, about everything. his perfectly logical analysis of the chain of events can be summed up thusly

prepare to have your minds blown people, we are through the looking glass here:

Click to expand...

Thanks Karl.

I thought one of them would say "It's a gubmint job"
 
28th Kingdom said:
To defend someone who has committed undeniable Doublethink (as in, he's on record as saying two contradictory things about the same event) ...is to engage directly in Doublethink yourself.
Click to expand...

Your conspiracy now invloves anyone who has ever misspoke, because thats obviously not possible. Ugh. I'm outta here, its too nice out for this....


:drillserg
 
You know something?

It's all about impressions. 28th kingdom has kept a thread entitled This is the thread that may very well change the way you look at 9/11 FOREVER! kicked for several days now. If you were really looking for answers, which thread would you first open when you came to JREF's Conspiracy Theory forum?

Now he's gone into full-blown seed spreading mode - printing the most scattered and noxious lies about 9/11, responding only to the ones he wants, while letting us respond to whatever we want - a mishmash of purpose, with absolutely no point but confusion.

Trollery at its finest. He demonstrates no real intent to discuss anything. He only appears happy to keep feeding on the attention we give him. Troll, troll, troll.

Goodbye, 28th.
 
Architect said:
Reckon you and me are both on ignore mate.
Click to expand...

I suppose it's a compliment. The most rational and scientifically based counter arguments need to be dismissed wholesale. Anything less might result in someone changing their minds or thinking for themselves...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom