• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

This is the thread that may very well change the way you look at 9/11 FOREVER!

chacal said:
Well, yes sorry I haven't read all the posts on this thread. So why would it be impossiple for the fires in the WTC 2 to have melted aluminum to a point where it would glow red hot? The aluminum in the pic I posted is acording to it's source heated redhot with charcoal. And ofcourse there were other materials that could melt in the tower.
Click to expand...

Hello, sir...thanks for writing. This post covers it all:

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=2171782#post2171782
 
28th Kingdom said:
It means to prove something false. Not to bloviate drivel until you feel better about your side of the argument.
Click to expand...

I don't know how to say this without seeming a little hostile, so please take my tone matter of factly: This is exactly what it appears your arguments are. You are not debating, you most certainly are not addressing the issues and successfully countering any of the evidence convincingly.
 
28th Kingdom said:
Some of the worst "debunking" I've ever seen. More like WISHFUL THINKING. I don't think any of you understand what the word, "debunk" actually means. It means to prove something false. Not to bloviate drivel until you feel better about your side of the argument. That may help you sleep easier at night...but in the grand scope of things...no one has ever TRULY debunked...any of the key facts surrounding 9/11.

BTW...someone send me some pics of plane debris...honestly, I have never seen any...
Click to expand...

I assume at some point you are going to show us how it is even possible to cut a column with thermite in the manner shown in your pic. Burden of proof is on you, so far you are severely lacking.
 
28th Kingdom said:
SHOW me where...a torch can make a smooth cut like that on steel...and leave behind MOLTEN metal on TOP of the steel beam. That black stuff is NOT melted steel from the column...it's cooled iron from the thermite reaction that was ON top of the column.

http://img243.imageshack.us/img243/2271/thermiteut7.jpg
Click to expand...

That's exactly what the picture shows you, you chose not to believe it because of your imaginary thermite cutting devices. Which you've still not supplied a reference for.
 
Miss Anthrope said:
So using your "logic" then, when your engine blows up, knowing nothing about how it works, you're able to say someone sabotaged it rather than a more rational explanation because.........?
Click to expand...

Why learn about physics, it would break his mental fixation on thermite and his hard facts and evidence that prove 9/11 was a conspiracy of our government which he has learned from youtube

YouTube the bible of CT follower everywhere; if it was a conspiracy the bad guys would only have to collect the commenting dolts (they would round me up for killing English) at YouTube who show a propensity toward insane CT ideas.
 
28th Kingdom said:
SHOW me where...a torch can make a smooth cut like that on steel...and leave behind MOLTEN metal on TOP of the steel beam. That black stuff is NOT melted steel from the column...it's cooled iron from the thermite reaction that was ON top of the column.
Click to expand...


Why do you make such claims without presenting evidence? If that is cooled iron from a thermite reaction, please provide proof that thermite would leave such marks. Proof, my man, proof!
 
28th Kingdom said:
Some of the worst "debunking" I've ever seen. More like WISHFUL THINKING. I don't think any of you understand what the word, "debunk" actually means. It means to prove something false. Not to bloviate drivel until you feel better about your side of the argument. That may help you sleep easier at night...but in the grand scope of things...no one has ever TRULY debunked...any of the key facts surrounding 9/11.

BTW...someone send me some pics of plane debris...honestly, I have never seen any...
Click to expand...
1) The drek you just posted is not a refutation of the debunking911 site. If the site is wrong, the provide a clear case as to what is wrong, and why.
2) Start a different thread if you want to discuss debris. Stop trying to dodge the existing issues by changing the subject.
 
28th Kingdom said:
Some of the worst "debunking" I've ever seen. More like WISHFUL THINKING. I don't think any of you understand what the word, "debunk" actually means. It means to prove something false. Not to bloviate drivel until you feel better about your side of the argument. That may help you sleep easier at night...but in the grand scope of things...no one has ever TRULY debunked...any of the key facts surrounding 9/11.

BTW...someone send me some pics of plane debris...honestly, I have never seen any...
Click to expand...

Here ya go:

http://www.anomalies-unlimited.com/Odd Pics 2/Pentagon.html
http://thebiggestsecretpict.online.fr/nwo/letterpiececomp.jpg
http://media.popularmechanics.com/images/0305911-flight77-lg.jpg
http://www.newsday.com/media/photo/2006-04/22909073.jpg
http://www.911myths.com/html/flight_93_3.html

That's a start. A few minutes on Google doing your own damned research will lead you to more.

So, about those devices that allow thermite to make horizontal cuts in beams? Or do you concede that they do not exist?
 
I get it now. 28th is actually a debunker. It all makes sense.

All the time he has been highlighting how utterly stupid and groundless these theories are and all the time he has been showing how utterly ridiculous they all are.

I apologies 28th, it is a novel approach and one that has well and truly worked.

Welcome to Jref 28th, the best debunker one could ever wish for.
 
stateofgrace said:
I get it now. 28th is actually a debunker. It all makes sense.

All the time he has been highlighting how utterly stupid and groundless these theories are and all the time he has been showing how utterly ridiculous they all are.

I apologies 28th, it is a novel approach and one that has well and truly worked.

Welcome to Jref 28th, the best debunker one could ever wish for.
Click to expand...

Yup.
 
28th Kingdom said:
SHOW me where...a torch can make a smooth cut like that on steel...and leave behind MOLTEN metal on TOP of the steel beam. That black stuff is NOT melted steel from the column...it's cooled iron from the thermite reaction that was ON top of the column.

http://img243.imageshack.us/img243/2271/thermiteut7.jpg
Click to expand...

Red herring. No matter how many pics are posted showing what you request you can still claim thermite. If you want to support your assertion, then show evidence (outside of 9/11) that thermite can perform in the manner you are claiming.
 
Miss Anthrope said:
So using your "logic" then, when your engine blows up, knowing nothing about how it works, you're able to say someone sabotaged it rather than a more rational explanation because.........?
Click to expand...

28th Kingdom said:
Hello, sir...thanks for writing. This post covers it all:

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=2171782#post2171782
Click to expand...

No it does not; it only proves you are a poor researcher, and have no idea about metal, or 9/11. You use false photos, videos that counter your point.

Learn how to make proper conclusions from real evidence.

Now, do you have some facts?

You have actually presented thermite with no supporting evidence. What happen to the oxygen generators sherlock?

You are joking about thermite, CD does not use thermite, only CT clowns use thermite.
 
Hahahaha. Yes, we have seen plenty of plane wreckage, even if you have not. Most of us have only seen that wreckage because of 9/11 morons making inaccurate claims. Since four planes filled with passengers who are known to have effectively ceased to exist, disappeared off radar and then were reported to have crashed, and certainly never made any kind of scheduled landing, the rest of us decided we didn't need to see wreckage in order to avoid insulting the dead and their families by presuming that no wreckage = no crashes. Having had to make the effort, however, there are plenty of airliner wreckage photographs available for flights 77 (Pentagon) and 93.

Here's the LC thread with the pictures! :D http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/ar/t2172.htm
 
So, the thread that will change the way I think about 9/11 boils down to the same old, same old, by an egotistical CT'er, who cannot (or will not) ever acknowledge when he is in error, knows more than anyone ever in the history of the world, can determine the contents of a molten stream of material just by looking at it, etc. ad infinitum.

You're right. I have changed my outlook. I now know for an absolute fact it's a total waste of time to do anything but mock you, because you are totally immune to reason, logic, and are so full of yourself you cannot acknowledge when someone else is correct.

What a maroon!
 
28th Kingdom said:
SHOW me where...a torch can make a smooth cut like that on steel...and leave behind MOLTEN metal on TOP of the steel beam. That black stuff is NOT melted steel from the column...it's cooled iron from the thermite reaction that was ON top of the column.

http://img243.imageshack.us/img243/2271/thermiteut7.jpg
Click to expand...

you find it, you are a cult member, just a follower, find it yourself!

do something beside look up CT sites and memorize your cult movement junk and bs

When will you present real evidence backed up with real science, you are just a CT follower, no real facts, no real story.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom