• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

This is the thread that may very well change the way you look at 9/11 FOREVER!

28th Kingdom said:
Look back through some of my earlier posts...and you will see my use of the term - OVER ANALYZE - as a pejorative. This is exactly what I'm referring to. I DON'T need to know how an engine works...to know when I HAVE SEEN A CAR. I can USE a cell phone without having any idea of how all the inner workings function. I CAN eat a bowl of cereal....with complete ignorance as to how it was made and/or packaged. You kind of get the point?
Click to expand...

Damn, dude! You just make it too easy. See, this is exactly what I'm on about!

Oh, and it would help to know how an engine works if you're going around claiming you saw a car that runs on water.
 
28th Kingdom said:
Wow guys...I just had a pretty weird thing happen. I was just thinking...and I realized, that although there were supposedly 4 plane crashes (involving HUGE commercial airliners) and we have video footage of all four crash sites. WE HAVE NOT seen a SINGLE piece of plane wreckage. Wow, that is beyond bizarre. I never even thought about it...but I remember seeing a documentary where they have footage of the Flight 93 site...and the reporter on the scene says it's just a big hole...he doesn't see any wreckage...and then of course, the well documented Pentagon tapes...where there is NO plane wreckage...and then the two towers...where we probably have the best view...and I MEAN we don't see a LICK of plane wreckage anywhere...That IS BEYOND strange.

Please, don't get sidetracked with this topic...I just wanted to share.
Click to expand...

You're kidding, right? There are hundreds of photos of plane wreckage. Witnesses at the scene reported carrying body parts and pieces of the aircraft out of the Pentagon. That's been extremely well documented on this forum and on numerous other websites.
 
28th Kingdom said:
Wow guys...I just had a pretty weird thing happen. I was just thinking...and I realized, that although there were supposedly 4 plane crashes (involving HUGE commercial airliners) and we have video footage of all four crash sites. WE HAVE NOT seen a SINGLE piece of plane wreckage. Wow, that is beyond bizarre. I never even thought about it...but I remember seeing a documentary where they have footage of the Flight 93 site...and the reporter on the scene says it's just a big hole...he doesn't see any wreckage...and then of course, the well documented Pentagon tapes...where there is NO plane wreckage...and then the two towers...where we probably have the best view...and I MEAN we don't see a LICK of plane wreckage anywhere...That IS BEYOND strange.

Please, don't get sidetracked with this topic...I just wanted to share.
Click to expand...

What???? Why do you insist on these LIES?

This is dumber than the "dissolving" towers.

I've seen dozens of pictures of wreckage. I'm sure we're about to be flooded with pictures of wreckage that you for some reason can't see.
 
28th Kingdom said:
Wow guys...I just had a pretty weird thing happen. I was just thinking...and I realized, that although there were supposedly 4 plane crashes (involving HUGE commercial airliners) and we have video footage of all four crash sites. WE HAVE NOT seen a SINGLE piece of plane wreckage. Wow, that is beyond bizarre. I never even thought about it...but I remember seeing a documentary where they have footage of the Flight 93 site...and the reporter on the scene says it's just a big hole...he doesn't see any wreckage...and then of course, the well documented Pentagon tapes...where there is NO plane wreckage...and then the two towers...where we probably have the best view...and I MEAN we don't see a LICK of plane wreckage anywhere...That IS BEYOND strange.

Please, don't get sidetracked with this topic...I just wanted to share.
Click to expand...

And you call yourself an investigator? LOL

At least acknowledge the fact that there was plenty of wreckage found and claim it was planted by the Illuminati or something like that. Even THAT would be better than this crap
 
By the way...if anyone constantly degrades me, harasses me, threatens me or spams up my thread with the same post...I will have no choice but to put them on ignore.

Please, remain civil...because that is how I have conducted myself since I arrived to this site.

Thank you.
 
28th Kingdom said:
Please, don't get sidetracked with this topic...I just wanted to share.
Click to expand...

No, you just want to wind us up because you have no answer to any of the critisms raised to your other arguments.

But thanks for sharing!

ETA: Okay, no answer that is any better than the BS you've already spewed.
 
28th Kingdom said:
By the way...if anyone constantly degrades me, harasses me, threatens me or spams up my thread with the same post...I will have no choice but to put them on ignore.

Please, remain civil...because that is how I have conducted myself since I arrived to this site.

Thank you.
Click to expand...

Accusing innocent people of mass murder is not "civil" no matter how politely you attempt to do so.
 
WE HAVE NOT seen a SINGLE piece of plane wreckage.
Click to expand...

Do you have a mouse in your pocket? I've seen plenty, I'm sure most of the others here have as well.

ETA. I'm sorry if the sites you frequent for your info hide things like photos of evidence from you in order to fool you.
 
Last edited:
I just had a pretty weird thing happen. I was just thinking
Click to expand...

That explains alot. Thinking does not seem to mean, what you think it does! Do you have an arguement to make? I have yet to see it! Same ol' same old!
 
Mr. Kingdom, please, why are you spurning me like this? Pretty please, show us the shaped thermite charges? Pretty please?
 
Architect said:
I'll make life easy for you, 28th:

http://fire-research.group.shef.ac.uk/Downloads/SC_Baltimore.pdf


And I tell you what, here's ANOTHER one which actually has criticism of some of NIST findings and says the fire would have been enough on it's own. By one of the best universities in the UK and everything!!!! Tell me where you think they made the mistake:

http://www.era.lib.ed.ac.uk/dspace/bitstream/1842/1216/1/WTCpaper.pdf
Click to expand...


Still waiting on your answer.

You know I'm kinda hoping you've got me on ignore because it's not going to reflect well on you...
 
Skibum said:
Do you have a mouse in your pocket? I've seen plenty, I'm sure most of the others here have as well.
Click to expand...

There might be a mouse in my shoe....

9490455687724e957.jpg
 
Get ready for another shocker. I know this is a very famous photo in 9/11 circles...but with our newly acquired knowledge about thermite...and how it turns into molten metal all by itself...this pic has become another smoking gun:

http://img243.imageshack.us/img243/2271/thermiteut7.jpg

Check out that column. See the nice little angle cut...and that black gook all around it. SCORE !!
 
28th Kingdom said:
Look back through some of my earlier posts...and you will see my use of the term - OVER ANALYZE - as a pejorative. This is exactly what I'm referring to. I DON'T need to know how an engine works...to know when I HAVE SEEN A CAR. I can USE a cell phone without having any idea of how all the inner workings function. I CAN eat a bowl of cereal....with complete ignorance as to how it was made and/or packaged. You kind of get the point?
Click to expand...

So using your "logic" then, when your engine blows up, knowing nothing about how it works, you're able to say someone sabotaged it rather than a more rational explanation because.........?
 
Check out that column. See the nice little angle cut...and that black gook all around it.
Click to expand...

Yup, exactly as one might expect a column to look that was torch cut during cleanup.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom