• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Has Anyone Seen A Realistice Explanation For Free Fall Of The Towers?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Christophera said:
Are you listing your assigned disinformation tasks? If so, you failed.
Click to expand...

Im listening to those you are using as "evidence'

So, why would a UK publication company claim they've never published a book under the title you've been claming for the last 200+ pages?

What would they gain from an American related problem?

cAre to explain Why they say they've never published such book?
 
Wait 'til Chris comes out with a diary published by Doubleday of one of the demolitions' experts who wired the rebar with C4 in 1968, only to claim the diary has been 'removed' by 'the powers that be'.

This is the world of the compulsive liar, folks. They make claims; when evidence is presented against those claims, they come up with 'evidence' of their own, never dreaming, initally, that anyone's going to fact-check them. Then, when they DO get fact-checked, they resort to excuses. "Oh, well it says it in MY copy." "Oh, someone changed the text between these two editions." "Oh, the university is suppressing the existence of that book."

It's pretty typical behavior.

I'm guessing, another 100 posts, and we'll have a complete psychological profile of Chris all figured out.
 
Christophera said:
See the post before this. When deniers repeatedly ignore and erroneously evaluate VERY BIG issues, I can hardly care about the little stuff.

In other words, when evidence is removed and destroyed in 3,000 capitol crimes, building plans are made unavailable to investigatiing agencies., or private investigations are blocked in what is supposed to be a collapse, little, petty details do not matter.

Your insistence on those inconsequential matters being important makes you a supporter of the infiltration of the US government and a protector of the lies that muderers hide behind.
Click to expand...
Christophera, you completely ignored the bolded portion of my quote, where I asked you to please demonstrate to us that you have even rudimentary research skills. Your refusal to answer so simple a request by calling it petty seriously erodes your credibility.

I program computers for a living. On occasion I also interview fellow programmers with an eye to hiring them. Sure, I read their résumés and ask for details about their education and computer related interests, but I also ask them in advance of the interview to write a simple program merely to demonstrate they can actually write a program.

In the last round of hiring we did, half of those requests went unanswered.

As a result, we didn't contact them for an interview. If they couldn't be bothered to spend an hour or so writing a simple program to demonstrate they know their stuff, we can't be bothered talking to them.

Same for you, Chris. If you can't be bothered demonstrating to us you can answer a simple question by spending a few minutes searching on the web, perferring instead to accuse us of being deniers and calling us names, why should we even bother listening to anything else you say?
 
Christophera said:
You have simply proven that the conspiracy to conceal evidence that was public extends to major universities. You have also prove that you are a disinformation agent who has no regard for laws which everybody knows have bee violated by government.

This is all substancial because the concrete core is fully evidenced by images of the demolition which show the concrete core of WTC 2.
Click to expand...
Christopher has obviouly never heard of Books in Print. I recall seeing these at libraries: thick volumes of large-format pages listing all books currently in print. It would be a n enormous task to track down and alter every simgle one of those if you wanted to cover up evidence that a given book was ever published.
 
Blue Mountain said:
Christopher has obviouly never heard of Books in Print. I recall seeing these at libraries: thick volumes of large-format pages listing all books currently in print. It would be a n enormous task to track down and alter every simgle one of those if you wanted to cover up evidence that a given book was ever published.
Click to expand...


how many libraries exist in the world?
how many of these archivla indexes are published?
 
Christophera said:
I know there is a conspiracy to conceal the true design and construction of the Twin Towers, which is why the designer of the towers chose April 1, 2006 to post this message....
Click to expand...
(Emphasis mine.) I think the date of the post explains everything.
 
Christophera said:
And the documentary I viewed makes it possible for me to use available evidence.
Click to expand...

Yet you still fail to provide us with raw evidence of the documentary. Therefor every claim you make regarding information in this documentary, is useless.

For example; this image, shows the base of the concrete core wall. The rebar is actually large than notated as it extends from the foundation upward and is 6 inch.
Click to expand...

It is a testemony of bad manner how you twist and turn your evidence everytime one of us debunks you. Where did this 6" rebar suddenly came from? And what is your source for this, for the dimentions?
 
Christophera said:
We are only working with available information here.

Logically, under present conditions of 9-11, explain an image of the WTC 2 core as being anythign but concrete.
Click to expand...

Your logical conclusions have no meaning whatsoever. I can give you plenty explainations for that picture. For example that it is a cloud of dust. If this is your only picture of an alleged concrete core, then your available (or raw) information is pretty thin and useless.
 
Christophera said:
I know there is a conspiracy to conceal the true design and construction of the Twin Towers, which is why the designer of the towers chose April 1, 2006 to post this message. Those who can confirm the concrete core are afraid to.

Christophera is correct in stating that the Twin Towers were constructed with a concrete core. Although in my original design the core was to be a steel framed one that decision was overridden by Minoru Yamasaki the architect.

That core should have resisted the airplane impacts AND the fires. I have said nothing for four and a half years but can remain silent no longer. My belief is that only explosives could have caused WTC 1 & WTC 2 to collapse the way they did on September 11, 2001.

Leslie E. Robertson
Director Leslie E. Robertson Associates, R.L.L.P. and lead engineer of the World Trade Center
Click to expand...
Chris, Chris, Chris... How quickly you forget. You've admited that you don't know who wrote this, yet you still use it as evidence of the concrete core. How dishonest of you.

Christophera said:
Get real. I don't know. But if it is from Robertson, he's done about what I would do in his situation given his position.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Christophera said:
I have the information of the Oxford encyclopedia of Technology and Inovation, published in 1992 and it is supported by numerous instances of raw evidence ORIGINAL core IMAGE. If you doubt the Oxford information, go find the one that provided it to me becuase I know the core was concrete and I have raw evidence showing it.

If you lack the integrity or experience to recognize it, your continued denial simply shows you are unreasonable.
Click to expand...

You show us a scan that is allegedly from some encyclopedia. I can make such an article using nice formatting in Microsoft Word. You fail to provide us with evidence that this article is genuine. Therefor this piece of evidence is meaningless.

So now we have:

- NO EVIDENCE for the PBS documentary
- NO EVIDENCE for the Oxford encyclopedia
 
Christophera said:
I know there is a conspiracy to conceal the true design and construction of the Twin Towers, which is why the designer of the towers chose April 1, 2006 to post this message. Those who can confirm the concrete core are afraid to.

Christophera is correct in stating that the Twin Towers were constructed with a concrete core. Although in my original design the core was to be a steel framed one that decision was overridden by Minoru Yamasaki the architect.

That core should have resisted the airplane impacts AND the fires. I have said nothing for four and a half years but can remain silent no longer. My belief is that only explosives could have caused WTC 1 & WTC 2 to collapse the way they did on September 11, 2001.

Leslie E. Robertson
Director Leslie E. Robertson Associates, R.L.L.P. and lead engineer of the World Trade Center
Click to expand...

:dl:

What a load of crap!
By the way, look at this message I recieved earlier today:


9/11 was not an inside job!

George W. Bush
President of the United States of America


It's true :)
 
Christophera said:
The images of the constrcution have been filtered and the few images of the concrete during constrcution are not available.
Click to expand...

Proof of excistance of those images? You say they are filtered and not available. You can only make such a claim if you can proof those images excist. You know, to avoid circulair reasoning.

You will have to settle for an image of the demolition showing the WTC 2 core exposed.
Click to expand...

No, I will not.

Unless of course you are a disinformation agent and do not care about your reputation and credibility whereupon you will insist time and time again that I produce information which you know is unavailable.
Click to expand...

Well, as said by yourself, we will only work with available evidence. You see how this works both ways?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom