• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Jason Bermas Back-Pedelling.

Do you know what is going to happen to you once you post your evidence?

As a survivalist, did you think about that?
 
Fact is by witholding the evidence he claims to have he is doing nothing except proving the deceptive practice of most woowoo twoofer poopoos. Now when he shows anything, he shot his own credibility in the face.
Your evidence lite is :deadhorse
 
Type "Lyte Trip" and "withholding evidence" on Google, see what is the first result...
 
According to the backbiting on the LC forums, the gist of this supposedly history-changing evidence is an "incorrect" (in what respect I'm not sure) animation and a led or coerced "witness" from the Citgo.

Cross-posted from another thread here.

Big funking whoop. But, benefit of the doubt, if you really have what you're making out that you think you have, take it to the courts. Or the press.

You're withholding evidence.
 
Last edited:
Lyte Trip said:
Unverifiable evidence.
Click to expand...

What about the 100 forensic specialists and others that identified 184 of the 189 people who died in the Pentagon attack (125 from the Pentagon and 64 onboard American Airlines flight 77)? All but one of the passengers onboard American Airlines flight 77 was positively identified as a match with DNA samples provided by the families of the crash victims.

Are all these people involved in a conspiracy as well?
 
from http://www.aopc.org/Index/Aopc/Glossary/a.htm
accessory
Person who aids or contributes in commission of a crime, usually by convincing someone to commit a crime or by helping the suspect escape or hide evidence. Usually not present during the crime. Compare accomplice.
Click to expand...

Or in other words: By having evidence of a massive crime and the coverup of said crime and not reporting it, lyte is commiting a crime as well......
 
TheGrunion said:
By all means, make up all the Bizarro World Rules you wish.

Just don't expect your "evidence" to convince anyone outside the rapidly dwindling pool of twoofers, unless you adhere to the same standards of evidence and accountability that the rest of the world abides by.

Then again, why do any real work if the true objective is to peddle a few DVD's.
Click to expand...

Oh I guarantee it will convince everyone that sees it that the plane flew on the north side of the station.

Including you.

I highly reccomend you work on a plan to defend the official story in this scenario if you don't want to join the truth movement.
 
Lyte Trip said:
Oh I guarantee it will convince everyone that sees it that the plane flew on the north side of the station.

Including you.

I highly reccomend you work on a plan to defend the official story in this scenario if you don't want to join the truth movement.
Click to expand...

To quote the immortal Scott Hall (the dude pictured in my avatar)

"Don't sing it, bring it."
 
Alt+F4 said:
What about the 100 forensic specialists and others that identified 184 of the 189 people who died in the Pentagon attack (125 from the Pentagon and 64 onboard American Airlines flight 77)? All but one of the passengers onboard American Airlines flight 77 was positively identified as a match with DNA samples provided by the families of the crash victims.

Are all these people involved in a conspiracy as well?
Click to expand...

Do you have proof that many people were involved?

Did all of these people actually collect the DNA from the pentagon themselves?

Were ANY of them at the pentagon at all?

Where is your evidence for any of this?
 
Lyte Trip said:
Oh I guarantee it will convince everyone that sees it that the plane flew on the north side of the station.

Including you.

I highly reccomend you work on a plan to defend the official story in this scenario if you don't want to join the truth movement.
Click to expand...

Against a non-existant piece of evidence?
Where are your evidence?
 
Big Les said:
According to the backbiting on the LC forums, the gist of this supposedly history-changing evidence is an "incorrect" (in what respect I'm not sure) animation and a led or coerced "witness" from the Citgo.

Cross-posted from another thread here.

Big funking whoop. But, benefit of the doubt, if you really have what you're making out that you think you have, take it to the courts. Or the press.

You're withholding evidence.
Click to expand...

Wrong.

This has nothing to do with the FDR.

No witnesses were coerced or manipulated at all.

This will be evident from the interviews and from the identities of the witnesses themselves.
 
Lyte Trip said:
Do you have proof that many people were involved?

Did all of these people actually collect the DNA from the pentagon themselves?

Were ANY of them at the pentagon at all?

Where is your evidence for any of this?
Click to expand...

Stop with this f-ing game, you [rule8]! :mad:

You show NO respect for the victims and families of AA77 and the Pentagon. It's all about you, isn't it? You're a selfish little [rule8]!
 
1- your evidence is true and you will get arrested for withholding evidence of a major criminal investigation.

2- you're just another internet troll.

:eusa_think:
 
Lyte Trip said:
Glad to hear you now believe 9/11 was an inside job!
Click to expand...

Nice try. I didn't say that. So far I have seen no evidence of that. You, however, have claimed to posses such evidence. I was making you, and everyone else, aware that by withholding such evidence, if it exists, you are commiting a crime. Now cough it up.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom