Who Disrespects NYPD & NYFD

Let's not forget the spin put on this thread as well. It wasn't started as an appeal to believe an eye witnesses. My first post says nothing about what he witnessed.

It was claimed at Ground Zero this year that the truth movement disrespects NYPD and NYFD. This thread was started to show NYPD and NYFD feel disrespect from those that would try to silence the questions. I also mentioned two NYFD in Central Park who shook my hand for wearing an Ivestigate 9/11 shirt.

You guys make it out like every single person affected by 9/11 and all of the NYPD/FD is disrespected by the truth movement. The video proved that wrong. Instead of admitting it building 7 was jumped on and the disrespect ignored. Could have saved 300 something posts if one person would have said "hey you know what?? We were wrong. There are victim's families, NYPD and NYFD that feel lied to and in no way feel disrespected by those asking for truth. Infact they feel disrespected by us." However that wasn't done. But that isn't a surprise at all.
 
How's that pipeline across Afghanistan coming along?

Better yet hows the opium fields that we let the Northern Alliance replant after the Taliban burned them down doing?? 70% of the worlds heroin comes from Afghanistan. America with it's "war on drugs" had a chance to wipe out 70% of the worlds heroin but didn't. Also look where the U.S. is setting up bases and where the pipeline will run. Not as smart as you like to think you are Hunter but that was proven on the cigarette question.
 
Last edited:


Okay Guys - who was the first one that hijacked this thread?
11107451d93669e73a.gif
11107451db56d36f14.gif

 
I can agree with Usual up to a point. There are people who don't feel that the whole story of 9/11 has been told, and certainly those people are owed explanations as far as is possible.

And, those people who worked on the pile who are now suffering from various illnesses should receive whatever medical treatment they need and, if it's shown that their problems are related to their 9/11 exposure, they (or their families) should be compensated.

That being said, I do feel that bullhorning "9/11 was an inside job" at Ground Zero on the anniversary was disrespectful. I was there that day and found the whole "Truth" movement presence there offensive. It simply was not the time or the place.

Ask questions, yes. Seek those answers. Keep pressing those in power to tell us the whole sordid story, and hold people accountable for their actions (or lack of action) that allowed (or caused) this tragedy occur.

But don't wave it in my face when I'm mourning. Not on 9/11, any year. And not at Ground Zero.
 
You can watch just the interview. Its about 30 seconds long.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7807592959569136609&q=fake+911+eyewitness

Now tell me this guy is not an actor.
That's a terrible voice over. I felt like I was watching Iron Chef. Not only did the voice not match what he was saying, which you can clearly see when he states "mostly due to structural failure." In addition the video cuts away frequently to attempt to distract from this. So yes, the video is real, the audio is fake. Nice try however.

BTW, I'm dying to know, are you just as fake? You come on to the site appearing to be a skeptic and now show yourself as a CTer. With so many sockpuppets running around, I've started to wonder whose sock you are. Of course, to be fair, I've wondered that since you first started posting.
 
Last edited:
Afghan opium production actually peaked in 2000. Now, who was in charge there then? Oh, that's right... the Taliban.

And who destroyed all the fields in Jan 2001?? Oh right.... the Taliban

I'll agree Hunter that GZ is a catch 22. Asking for 9/11 truth but don't voice it on 9/11 or at GZ is a touchy subject. But you said, "don't wave it in my face when I'm mourning." Well to that I have to say Don't tell me I can't ask for truth as I mourn. I lost a friend that day, at that location and almost lost a family member.

Now we can continue tomorrow or later today..... whatever you wish to call it. Have a good one.
 
Usual:

I feel for your loss. I also lost a good friend that day. I understand the need to know everything I can about the circumstances of 9/11. I have questions in my own mind that have never been answered to my satisfaction.

I'll respect your right to ask questions if you'll respect my right to mourn. Deal?

*offers handshake*

We can pick this up later. And just so you know, I know the difference on the cigarette thing. I understand the difference between voluntary and involuntary exposure. If you'll go back and read the post, I said so, just not in so many words. I underestimated you. That was a mistake on my part and I won't make it again.

Cheers, John
 
There's news footage of a "Regular Joe" being interviewed. Listen to the way the official story rolls off his lips before it's even the official story. Watch it and tell me it doesn't sound scrpited.

I can't tell you it doesn't sound scripted, because it is scripted. This is one fantastically hilarious and threadbare attempt at voice-over. If you believe this clip is authentic, then someone has reeled you in. But I guess gags like this will fool a small segment of any population.


I re-list the URL for the general amusement of passers by:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7807592959569136609&q=fake+911+eyewitness


ETA: Is the guy actually smiling when "talking" about the collapse of the towers? This is classic stuff. Thank you to whomever linked to it originally.
 
Last edited:
Russell:

Where was your outrage when Saddam was killing a million Kurds?

I don't support the quagmire the US is in now, and I don't believe we should have stayed in Iraq an hour after Saddam fell. Their government is THEIR business, not ours.

But Saddam is one of the most evil, if not the most evil, human being now walking the planet and needed to be removed from power.

[/rant]

Then get on TV and tell me we're going to remove Saddam because he is evil.

Don't say, "Indeed, the United States has for decades sought to play a more permanent role in Gulf regional security. While the unresolved conflict with Iraq provides the immediate justification, the need for a substantial American force presence in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein." (page 14 Rebuilding America's Defenses) http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf

They didn't care less about him. They wanted bases.

Rumsfeld-Saddam.jpg


Is that a fair request?
 
I can't tell you it doesn't sound scripted, because it is scripted. This is one fantastically hilarious and threadbare attempt at voice-over. If you believe this clip is authentic, then someone has reeled you in. But I guess gags like this will fool a small segment of any population.


I re-list the URL for the general amusement of passers by:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7807592959569136609&q=fake+911+eyewitness


ETA: Is the guy actually smiling when "talking" about the collapse of the towers? This is classic stuff. Thank you to whomever linked to it originally.

Its not a hoax. Im gonna emai fox news myself about it.
 

Back
Top Bottom