Who Disrespects NYPD & NYFD

Gravy said:
My internet connection is having a fit so I can't view the video, but it's important to remember that experts from all over New York and beyond made a beeline for the WTC starting when the first tower fell. Structural engineers, construction contractors, demolitions experts:
Click to expand...

This is ridiculous.
 
jessicarabbit said:
You can watch just the interview. Its about 30 seconds long.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7807592959569136609&q=fake+911+eyewitness

Now tell me this guy is not an actor.
Click to expand...


have to see the real video, not in the neat voice video

the real source, sounds like these guys overdubbed the whole thing to make up the video, too much audio gain

sounds fake voice

However, I saw it on live TV, I saw the first aircraft damage in WTC1 and knew it was on purpose due to the clear weather, I am a pilot and know no airline pilot would hit a building at high speed (there are lots of options and reasons it could not happen without the pilot doing it) and the fact the aircraft had entered the building show the impact was done at a high speed, low speed impact would have left aircraft parts out side on the impact side. I saw live TV second aircraft hit, it was going real fast, the impact was tremendous, looked like 4 500 pound bombs going off in slow motion, wow, I was right it was equal to in energy a ton of TNT. I was bombed by Saddams scuds so a 500 pound bomb has knocked my windows out.

When the buildings fell I knew the stucture had failed due to fire and impact.

Why would someone not say what he said if he saw what happen, this CT movie is junk and his statement proves the video to be Junk.

Hey I watched it, This was better than having to be near the whole doltish video, thanks

But what would someone say? What a bunch of junk. And they say this is proof of ?
 
Usual Suspect, do you think your government planned to kill a thousand of its citicenz by air polluting at ground zero?
 
Gravy said:
My internet connection is having a fit so I can't view the video, but it's important to remember that experts from all over New York and beyond made a beeline for the WTC starting when the first tower fell. Structural engineers, construction contractors, demolitions experts:
Click to expand...

Hes just an eyewitness. He also says he saw the plane go in. Hes the most obvious actor you will ever see. Watch the video.
 
jessicarabbit said:
It isn't sarcasm, its one of the key body language indicators of a man lying. That interview is taken in a new york street on the afternoon of 911. Fox will confirm it.
Click to expand...


what would he say, balls can not fall faster than the speed of light

i have to wait before I comment so I can as Dr Thermite Jones what happen

What that guy said is what you would say if you saw what he saw and he said it!

why would you say anything else on 9/11, you CT guys did not have your made up stuff ready for idiots to pick a nut story out of you bag of junk science

i saw the impact damage, the second impact happen and due to structural damage and fires the WTC fell, am I missing something here,

what is up, what else would you say, there were no sounds of CD traveling through the city

are CT guys too challenged to use their minds and say what they think happened based on visual data?

so I would say the same if I was not such a dolt when asked a question
 
jessicarabbit said:
In 1999 the Luther King family took the government to court. A jury found that the government had conspired to kill Martin Luther King and had framed James Earl Ray as a patsy.

I am making the point that this disproves assertions that the government don't conspire to kill american citizens.
Click to expand...

Is this not a fair point gravy?
 
beachnut said:
what would he say, balls can not fall faster than the speed of light

i have to wait before I comment so I can as Dr Thermite Jones what happen

What that guy said is what you would say if you saw what he saw and he said it!

why would you say anything else on 9/11, you CT guys did not have your made up stuff ready for idiots to pick a nut story out of you bag of junk science

i saw the impact damage, the second impact happen and due to structural damage and fires the WTC fell, am I missing something here,

what is up, what else would you say, there were no sounds of CD traveling through the city

are CT guys too challenged to use their minds and say what they think happened based on visual data?

so I would say the same if I was not such a dolt when asked a question
Click to expand...

An eyewitness would just say "It collapsed" they wouldnt offer reasons
 
Let me get this straight Jessica. On 9/11, they managed to pay an actor to basically give the NIST's conclusion before the investigation even got started.

Why would they do that?
 
Usual Suspect, do you think your government planned to kill a thousand of its citicenz by air polluting at ground zero?
 
jessicarabbit said:
This is ridiculous.
Click to expand...

Isn't it just?

So now you have all this evidence could you guys tell us what you think happened on 911?

In a few short sentences. I will give you an example.

19 guys funded through Al Quada hijacked four planes. Three of them hit buildings. Two burnt and fell down. One hit the Pentagon. The forth crashed after the passengers staged a fight back. NIST have produced a report into the collapse of the towers that is accepted by the vast majority of the scientific community. At the moment they are investigating why WTC 7 collapsed.

OK over to you.

I'll start you off.

"Some time before 911............... (please enter sentences)..........................."

(Ps, no nitpicking of my sentences just enter your own)

Free my mind and tell me what happened, no excuses, no fall back on “we’re just asking question”. No more “that’s for the USG to tell us”.

YOU are the accusers of US citizens of being involved in mass murder of their fellow countrymen, time to put up. Tell us what happened.
 
For those of you proposing alternate theories and then refusing to explain what it is you propose, both my questions and Pardalis', among others, keep in mind that you can't convince us of something unless you tell us what it is.

At this point, I no longer have any idea what you all think happened on Sept. 11th. Since you refuse to explain it, I'm forced to conclude either (a) you don't know, or (b) you aren't satisfied with your own story. Neither of these is likely to convince anybody else.

So, please, explain yourselves. We're waiting.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom