Who Disrespects NYPD & NYFD

I'm not even sure that video is genuine. It could be some lame attempt by Ctists to create a false eyewitness.

I wouldn't be surprised.
 
Pardalis said:
Your claim was that the government was capable of deliberately conniving the murder of a 1000 of its own people. Are you backing down from that claim now?
Click to expand...

No I'm not cause lying about the air quality will result in American deaths. To me that's murder.
 
Usual Suspect said:
You asked if the gov't would be capable of the deaths of 1,000. I showed you an answer.
Click to expand...

No, your claim was that the government was capable of conniving, which means before the fact, the murder of its own citicenz, by the thousands.

Did they plot this air pollution too?
 
jessicarabbit said:
Its from Fox coverage on the day of 911. Email it to Fox and i'm sure they will confirm it.
Click to expand...

The way this "witness" quickly spews out at the end the "because of structural damage..." seems a bit sarcastic.

Why would he be sarcastic on 9/11?
 
Usual Suspect said:
You asked if the gov't would be capable of the deaths of 1,000. I showed you an answer.
Click to expand...

"It's much better to change your point of view in response to reality than to insist reality has got it wrong because it doesn't share your point of view."

Now where have we heard that before???:rolleyes:
 
Usual Suspect, do you think your government connived a plot to kill thousands of its own people by air polluting at ground zero?
 
Pardalis said:
The way this "witness" quickly spews out at the end the "because of structural damage..." seems a bit sarcastic.

Why would he be sarcastic on 9/11?
Click to expand...

It isn't sarcasm, its one of the key body language indicators of a man lying. That interview is taken in a new york street on the afternoon of 911. Fox will confirm it.
 
uk_dave said:
Now tell me this guy isn't a construction worker, engineer or architect who might actually have some knowledge about how buildings react to massive structural damage and fire.

'cause you know what? If I'd been on the street in NY that day and witnessed what he witnessed first hand, and had been interviewed, I would very likely have said something very similar.

It's only those who believe that steel has to melt to fail who cannot see the obvious potential for collapse of a steel framed building in those conditions.
Click to expand...
My internet connection is having a fit so I can't view the video, but it's important to remember that experts from all over New York and beyond made a beeline for the WTC starting when the first tower fell. Structural engineers, construction contractors, demolitions experts:

Several demolition teams had reached Ground Zero by 3:00 pm on 9/11, and these individuals witnessed the collapse of WTC 7 from within a few hundred feet of the event.

We have spoken with several who possess extensive experience in explosive demolition, and all reported seeing or hearing nothing to indicate an explo-sive detonation precipitating the collapse.

As one eyewitness told us, "We were all standing around helpless...we knew full well it was going to collapse. Everyone there knew. You gotta remember there was a lot of confusion and we didn't know if another plane was com-ing...but I never heard explosions like demo charges. We knew with the damage to the building and how hot the fire was, that building was gonna go, so we just waited, and a little later it went." http://tinyurl.com/m5kf5
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom