• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Has Anyone Seen A Realistice Explanation For Free Fall Of The Towers?

Status
Not open for further replies.
You find the fact that the towers collapsed laughable? Go tell that to the relatives of the some 2700 people that died in or around the WTC.

:mad:

Do you misunderstand things on purpose? Those relatives will think less of that than me laughing at those who term an obvious explosion a collapse.

I stand for justice by acknowleging the truth with reason, they will like that. I stand for using truth to protect the living. They will like that too.
 
Do you misunderstand things on purpose? Those relatives will think less of that than me laughing at those who term an obvious explosion a collapse.

I stand for justice by acknowleging the truth with reason, they will like that. I stand for using truth to protect the living. They will like that too.

Well, let me just say, you are doing a bang-up job.
 
Please don't tell me that's your raw evidence...

Yes, of the last of a high speed series of delayed detonations. I know you haven't got a clue of what evidence is so don't stress trying to fabricate some misrepresentation to support the absudity of collapse.
 
Oh were's a web site that supports the no concrete core idea.
http://manhattan.about.com/od/september11th2001/a/worldtradecente.htm

"Construction of the World Trade center began in 1966. The south tower was completed first in 1971. The Towers were built using a new drywall system reinforced by steel cores, making them the first skycrapers ever built without the use of masonry. "

With what? A bunch of text. Where is the raw evidence?

I've got lots in support of a concrete core and it even disproves the steel core columns. Meaning your site is very insubstantial in comparison.

http://algoxy.com/conc/core.html
 
Yes, of the last of a high speed series of delayed detonations. I know you haven't got a clue of what evidence is so don't stress trying to fabricate some misrepresentation to support the absudity of collapse.

A blatant unprovoked attack? Congratulations, you are even less respectable than I took you for.


And you have audible data to support your claims, right?
 
With what? A bunch of text. Where is the raw evidence?

I've got lots in support of a concrete core and it even disproves the steel core columns. Meaning your site is very insubstantial in comparison.

http://algoxy.com/conc/core.html

Hmmm. I see abunch of text on your web site too. I wonder what's the difference. Anyhoo. Answer my question you cowardly liar. If all the concrete billowed away, what the heck are you pointing at in your picture?
 
Hmmm. I see abunch of text on your web site too. I wonder what's the difference. Anyhoo. Answer my question you cowardly liar. If all the concrete billowed away, what the heck are you pointing at in your picture?

My text is called reasoning homey. reasoning WITH evidence. New and strange concept for you. Stop hiitting your head you've find it reasonable.
 
Last edited:
My text is called reasoning homey. reasoning WITH evidence. New and strange concept for you. Stop hiitting your head you've find it reasonable.
Nope, your text is called fantasy with misrepresentation. A new and strange concept to you is honesty and integrity as well as truth.

Oh and come on coward. Show me where that piece of concrete is:
 
Hmmm. I see abunch of text on your web site too. I wonder what's the difference. Anyhoo. Answer my question you cowardly liar. If all the concrete billowed away, what the heck are you pointing at in your picture?

The explosive circuits were interrupted by intelligent caring, courageous Mohawks that figured out wtf was happening. Imagine how impossible it would be to convince anyone if that one chunk of the core wasn't left.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom