uruk
Philosopher
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2003
- Messages
- 5,311
Homer, it all blowed up. Don't cry.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=3684&stc=1&d=1161496994
Then what were you pointing at in this picture? Or are you lieing?
Homer, it all blowed up. Don't cry.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=3684&stc=1&d=1161496994
Homer, it all blowed up. Don't cry.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=3684&stc=1&d=1161496994
You find the fact that the towers collapsed laughable? Go tell that to the relatives of the some 2700 people that died in or around the WTC.
![]()
Do you misunderstand things on purpose? Those relatives will think less of that than me laughing at those who term an obvious explosion a collapse.
I stand for justice by acknowleging the truth with reason, they will like that. I stand for using truth to protect the living. They will like that too.
Please don't tell me that's your raw evidence...
Well, let me just say, you are doing a bang-up job.
Oh were's a web site that supports the no concrete core idea.
http://manhattan.about.com/od/september11th2001/a/worldtradecente.htm
"Construction of the World Trade center began in 1966. The south tower was completed first in 1971. The Towers were built using a new drywall system reinforced by steel cores, making them the first skycrapers ever built without the use of masonry. "
Yes, of the last of a high speed series of delayed detonations. I know you haven't got a clue of what evidence is so don't stress trying to fabricate some misrepresentation to support the absudity of collapse.
Then what were you pointing at in this picture? Or are you lieing?
With what? A bunch of text. Where is the raw evidence?
I've got lots in support of a concrete core and it even disproves the steel core columns. Meaning your site is very insubstantial in comparison.
http://algoxy.com/conc/core.html
A blatant unprovoked attack? Congratulations, you are even less respectable than I took you for.
And you have audible data to support your claims, right?
Ok, so where is it in this picture?No, it all blowed up in your pictures. There was one piece left just for you.
Massive raw data in support of the concrete core.
http://algoxy.com/conc/core.html
And all of that is used to explain near free fall and total pulverization.
http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11scenario.html]
Hmmm. I see abunch of text on your web site too. I wonder what's the difference. Anyhoo. Answer my question you cowardly liar. If all the concrete billowed away, what the heck are you pointing at in your picture?
Christophera said:Massive raw data in support of the concrete core.
http://algoxy.com/conc/core.html
And all of that is used to explain near free fall and total pulverization.
http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11scenario.html
Second link don't work.
Massive raw data in support of the concrete core.
http://algoxy.com/conc/core.html
And all of that is used to explain near free fall and total pulverization.
http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11scenario.html]
Nope, your text is called fantasy with misrepresentation. A new and strange concept to you is honesty and integrity as well as truth.My text is called reasoning homey. reasoning WITH evidence. New and strange concept for you. Stop hiitting your head you've find it reasonable.
Hmmm. I see abunch of text on your web site too. I wonder what's the difference. Anyhoo. Answer my question you cowardly liar. If all the concrete billowed away, what the heck are you pointing at in your picture?