• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

FBI Complicity in '93 WTC Bombing- Debunk needed

pdoherty76 said:
maybe his warnings got the attacks called off

anyway, hes allowed to be wrong

gravy im waiting for an answer. WHY DOESNT GUILIANI, PORT AUTHORITY, FDNY AND OTHERS SUE ALEX JONES?
Click to expand...


You ever hear Alex Jones say that "George Bush" murdered 2,700 people on 9/11? No. You ever hear Alex Jones say that "criminal elements of the U.S. Government" murdered 2,700 people on 9/11? Yes. That's the distinction. Jones is a coward. He knows his claims are so unsubstantiated that he refuses to name someone specifically for fear of prosecution or tort action.
 
Last edited:
pdoherty76 said:
jones is not anti-semitic

he quotes those sources because they are independent
Click to expand...

I didn't say he was anti-Semetic. I said he uses neo-Nazi (anti-Semetic) "news" sources.

Independence does not guarantee accuracy, freedom from propaganda, or validity of news source.
 
pdoherty76 said:
look gravy i will continue to call alex jones a hero until i see evidence otherwise
Click to expand...


Don't you think it's ironic that when you claimed to have a degree and some people here questioned that claim, you didn't immediately fall over yourself to prove that you had a degree?

I'm not suggesting that you should have to to prove it.

Anymore than I am suggesting the FBI have to prove they weren't complicit in the WTC bombing.

Innocent until PROVED guilty, and all that.
 
pdoherty76 said:
hes a great american. he cares and he exposes whats going on
Click to expand...

Alex Jones? He is nuts, he has proposed zero information on 9/11 that is correct.

He is just a fire fanning CT guy, ringleader of clowns at best.

My short OpEd on Alex Jones (predicted, he predicts everything, chemtrails, gulags for his clowns)

after wasting hours researching his rants, it has become a waste of time

How would anyone know when his cry of wolf will be true? It is the same time constant as truth coming from the 9/11 truth movement is regulated by!
 
pdoherty76 said:
maybe his warnings got the attacks called off

anyway, hes allowed to be wrong

gravy im waiting for an answer. WHY DOESNT GUILIANI, PORT AUTHORITY, FDNY AND OTHERS SUE ALEX JONES?
Click to expand...
Answer your own question. Why?
 
Gravy said:
I'm wrong "as usual?" Please show an example of me being "wrong."

I'm wrong in this case? Here's Jones' "prediction of 9/11." He is referring to the 1993 bombing, which as has been stated, Jones believes was allowed by the US government: "If you let some terrorist group do it, like the World Trade Center, we know who to blame."

Will you call for Jones to retract his accusations against the FDNY and Silverstein? Isn't that the least you can to do help people who have been so maliciously maligned by him?
Click to expand...

gravy u have two options:

1) get these maligned people to sue jones

2) stop moaning

which is it to be?

silverstein is a very wealthy man, the port authority have great lawyers, they dont need u touting for them at GZ

they should sue or shut it

they wont sue, i guarantee it
 
pdoherty76 said:
gravy u have two options:

1) get these maligned people to sue jones

2) stop moaning

which is it to be?

silverstein is a very wealthy man, the port authority have great lawyers, they dont need u touting for them at GZ

they should sue or shut it

they wont sue, i guarantee it
Click to expand...

Stop being willfully obtuse.
 
pdoherty76 said:
they wont sue, i guarantee it
Click to expand...

They can't sue, legally. Why don't you do a little research, inform yourself of the civil and criminal elements of defamation, and come back here and give us a really good lesson on why they can't sue?
 
Straight from WorldNetDaily, NOT a liberal news outlet:

The FBI and the mad bombers

"According to tapes played at the trial of the "terrorists" in that case, the FBI planted Emad A. Salem to infiltrate an Arab group in New York. His job was to act, again, as an agent provocateur -- inciting violent attacks. It was Salem who convinced the other participants to bomb the World Trade Center. When he was asked to assemble the bomb, he went to the FBI to ask for harmless powder to avoid a catastrophe. The FBI essentially cut him off. To make a long, complicated story short and simple: The FBI spent $3 million of your tax money to blow up the World Trade Center.

Remember this the next time you hear about a so-called "terrorist incident." And, tell your representatives and senators it's time to rein in the mad bombers and provocateurs in our own government." - WorldNetDaily (12/09/99)
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=14869
Click to expand...
 
alex jones

pdoherty76 said:
maybe his warnings got the attacks called off

anyway, hes allowed to be wrong

gravy im waiting for an answer. WHY DOESNT GUILIANI, PORT AUTHORITY, FDNY AND OTHERS SUE ALEX JONES?
Click to expand...

this is a hard question

Alex Jones has no great amounts of money, there is no return on your investment to sue.

Alex Jones is a nut case and you can not sue the mentally impaired.

Alex Jones is not from earth, but a known hot air source from beta max planet system started by the sony corp in 1978, Alex fell through the time warp...

choices, just too many
 
uk_dave said:
Don't you think it's ironic that when you claimed to have a degree and some people here questioned that claim, you didn't immediately fall over yourself to prove that you had a degree?

I'm not suggesting that you should have to to prove it.

Anymore than I am suggesting the FBI have to prove they weren't complicit in the WTC bombing.

Innocent until PROVED guilty, and all that.
Click to expand...

if i was accused of killing 3000 people i would sue
 
pdoherty76 said:
if i was accused of killing 3000 people i would sue
Click to expand...

though, because you live in fantasy land, those in the real world, also know that when someone is accusing your of murder, you also take into consideration who is exactly making that claim.

That if that person's claim can be taken seriously or will be ignored for the outlandishness it is.

In this case, the people making that claim, are nothing more than ignorant blowhards. No need to sue people too dumb to know what's true.
 
Arus808 said:
though, because you live in fantasy land, those in the real world, also know that when someone is accusing your of murder, you also take into consideration who is exactly making that claim.

That if that person's claim can be taken seriously or will be ignored for the outlandishness it is.

In this case, the people making that claim, are nothing more than ignorant blowhards. No need to sue people too dumb to know what's true.
Click to expand...


right, so why is gravy moaning?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom