• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

of WTC7 and things being pulled

Killtown said:
I'd just like to hear it from you. is that a crime?
Click to expand...

what's the point. you wont believe him even if he's quoting the definition word for word as presented in the linked document in the first post.

this is all just a game to you, which is truly sad and pathetic.
 
Gravy said:
Killtown, I assume you've read the many pages of eyewitness accounts I collected. Please summarize what they say about WTC 7's condition on 9/11.
Click to expand...
Never assume.

But from the accounts I've read, the condition of the 7 was "not good". So what is your point? Can you show me evidence of a large steel structure ever collapsing after witness accounts described the condition of this structure before it collapsed as "not good"?
 
Killtown said:
Never assume.

But from the accounts I've read, the condition of the 7 was "not good". So what is your point? Can you show me evidence of a large steel structure ever collapsing after witness accounts described the condition of this structure before it collapsed as "not good"?
Click to expand...


Well, the steel frame portion of the windsor building did look a bit iffy before that collapsed.
 
Killtown said:
Who said he called to "discuss"? Why couldn't he have just called to INFORM?
Click to expand...

Inform him of what? If he's a perp he knows it all already, probably for months. You CTs have them discussing, Silverstein tells him to "pull it" (CTspeak for blow it up) and then the F.C. goes off and does exactly what he's told. So, inform him of what exactly?
 
sleahead said:
Inform him of what? If he's a perp he knows it all already, probably for months. You CTs have them discussing, Silverstein tells him to "pull it" (CTspeak for blow it up) and then the F.C. goes off and does exactly what he's told. So, inform him of what exactly?
Click to expand...

Actually the real conversation went something like this:

Fire Commander: The birds fly south early this year

Silverstein: But pidgeons contemplate the road

Fire commander: The eagle has big wings


THEN WTC7 Collapsed.
 
Killtown said:
Never assume.

But from the accounts I've read, the condition of the 7 was "not good". So what is your point? Can you show me evidence of a large steel structure ever collapsing after witness accounts described the condition of this structure before it collapsed as "not good"?
Click to expand...

Could you provide an example of a large steel structure not collapsing after witness accounts described the condition of the structure as "not good"?
 
Killtown said:
and FDNY ordered FF's away at around 11:30am. "Afternoon" technically starts at after 12pm or "after noon".
Click to expand...

larry said (pullit)----with cables, at say 12pm'ish, so what happened in those 5 hours? rigging with cables?

after all larry said (we pulled it and watched it fall) so im assuming the riggers were...rigging for 5 hours then right?.....then all the sudden it collapsed? without a single rigger hurt?

seems that we have a 5 hour window here...
 
rearnakedchoke said:
larry said (pullit)----with cables, at say 12pm'ish, so what happened in those 5 hours? rigging with cables?

after all larry said (we pulled it and watched it fall) so im assuming the riggers were...rigging for 5 hours then right?.....then all the sudden it collapsed? without a single rigger hurt?

seems that we have a 5 hour window here...
Click to expand...

Did anyone report seeing anyone rigging anything?
 
or the cranes that were brought in, while all those firefighters were around the area and reported seeing nothing of the sort?
 
rearnakedchoke said:
larry said (pullit)----with cables, at say 12pm'ish, so what happened in those 5 hours? rigging with cables?

after all larry said (we pulled it and watched it fall) so im assuming the riggers were...rigging for 5 hours then right?.....then all the sudden it collapsed? without a single rigger hurt?

seems that we have a 5 hour window here...
Click to expand...
rearnaked, you are in way, way over your head.

Please read my paper on WTC 7, which is linked in my signature. It should resolve any questions you have about the condition of WTC 7, its expected collapse, and the decision to withdraw firefighters from danger. If you still have questions after reading it, please let us know.
 
Gravy said:
rearnaked, you are in way, way over your head.

Please read my paper on WTC 7, which is linked in my signature. It should resolve any questions you have about the condition of WTC 7, its expected collapse, and the decision to withdraw firefighters from danger. If you still have questions after reading it, please let us know.
Click to expand...
hey id rather be over my head then not even know what wtc7 is..as per 100% of my real life buds..

youre paper cant be more complete then the 9/11 report can it?
 
Killtown said:
Never assume.

But from the accounts I've read, the condition of the 7 was "not good". So what is your point? Can you show me evidence of a large steel structure ever collapsing after witness accounts described the condition of this structure before it collapsed as "not good"?
Click to expand...
"Not good" is your summary of what the FDNY said about the building?

Yes or no: have you read all the eyewitness accounts about WTC 7's conditon that I collected in my WTC 7 paper? If not, why?
 
rearnakedchoke said:
hey id rather be over my head then not even know what wtc7 is..as per 100% of my real life buds..

youre paper cant be more complete then the 9/11 report can it?
Click to expand...
That shows how far in over your head you are. The 9/11 Commission report does not discuss ancillary damage to any buildings. Perhaps you should read it.

Will you read my paper on WTC 7? If not, why?
 
what paper are you talking about, ill read it. i already know it will be just people saying the building was on fire, it was damaged, ect-ect-ect. and most likely will not contain anybody saying the heard poping or booms, seconds before TOTAL collapse.. by the way is that the paper russell helped you on?
 
rearnakedchoke said:
what paper are you talking about, ill read it. i already know it will be just people saying the building was on fire, it was damaged, ect-ect-ect. and most likely will not contain anybody saying the heard poping or booms, seconds before TOTAL collapse.. by the way is that the paper russell helped you on?
Click to expand...

Are you familiar with the phrase, "confirmational bias"?
 
Gravy said:
That shows how far in over your head you are. The 9/11 Commission report does not discuss ancillary damage to any buildings. Perhaps you should read it.

Will you read my paper on WTC 7? If not, why?
Click to expand...
well i asked for that one, i have read NISTS report "somewhat". and ive also heard what kevin ryan has to say about it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom