• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

of WTC7 and things being pulled

Killtown said:
More like this:

Silverstein was involved in an evil plot. Therefore...
Silverstein was keen to cover up the plot. Therefore...
Silverstein was asked to do an interview where he would have to reassert his lies. Therefore...
Silverstein would have felt under pressure. Therefore...
Silverstein accidentally slipped up. Therefore...
Silverstein's comments reveal an evil plot. Therefore...
Silverstein was involved in an evil plot.
Click to expand...
the same fallacy is still there
:dl:
 
Number of lies in his comment:

David Wong said:
1) The key thing to remember about Killtown is that his entire goal is to shock.

2) He promotes the "no plane" in Shanksville theory specifically because it lets him photoshop feces onto the grave site of heroes.

3) This is why he went on the LC board and denied the Holocaust,

4) this is why he says the FDNY was in on the murder of more than 300 of their own firefighters,

5) this is why he says witnesses and hundreds of workers in the clean up crews near Shanksville are all murderous liars.

6) his primary motivation is the pleasure he takes from doing harm to others.

7) He enjoys getting to throw out vicious accusations from behind the cover of anonymity, enjoys the thought of common people having to scramble to clear their names. It's fun for him.
Click to expand...

Seven lies. Wow.
 
sleahead said:
Here's a question I asked troofer1234, but he failed to respond:

"For example, I cannot see why the Fire Commander would be ringing Silverstein at all."

Perhaps Killtown will take a shot at it.
Click to expand...
Has it ever occured to you that F.C. was in on it and "they" who made the descision to pull was no the FDNY, but the perps which included this F.C.?
 
Killtown said:
Seven lies. Wow.
Click to expand...

It's funny how you don't provide any evidence that you infact didn't lie seven times, in order to vindicate yourself. It makes me wonder if you really care about whether you're wrong or not. I personally believe you don't care and you are just here because this is fun for you.
 
Killtown said:
Has it ever occured to you that F.C. was in on it and "they" who made the descision to pull was no the FDNY, but the perps which included this F.C.?
Click to expand...
so do you believe the FC was actually a member of FDNY, or do you beleive he was an agent impersonating a fire fighter?

if you beleive the former, the same problem still applies, you are accusing a member of FDNY in being complicit in the murder of 300 of his brothers

if the latter, why the disguise at all? surely larry would know whats going on, and then why talk about it all? they asked about his conversations with the fire department, not the fake fire fighters
 
Killtown said:
Has it ever occured to you that F.C. was in on it and "they" who made the descision to pull was no the FDNY, but the perps which included this F.C.?
Click to expand...

Yes it did occur to me, but as this is all pre-planned, there is no need to ring Silverstein at all.
 
Blutarsky said:
The first has been discussed ad nauseam, but here are some questions I have:

  • 1) Why would firemen be involved in the execution phase of a CD?
  • 2) What specialized knowledge would a fireman have to conduct such a dangerous operation?
  • 3) In a CT in which every complicit party has been completely silent (those who planted bombs, detonated them), why would its main architect Sliverstein be so absent minded as to admit his culpability in the biggest act of mass murder in American history? Generally greedy hatemongers are better with secrets than that...
  • 4) Why will no CD expert attest that the phrase "pull it" is a common trade term?
5) There is not one instance of any CD expert attesting that the phrase "pull it" is EVER used in conjunction with CD. Rather it has a SPECIFIC useage, in that it is exclusively used to describe a situation where a building is physically pulled down with cables and machines, as was done with WTC 6.
Click to expand...
1) Cause they were in on it?

2) Clarify question.

3) Aren't you guys the ones saying it couldn't be a conspiracy cause someone would eventually slip and spill the beans? Well here's your proof of that.

4) I don't know, why?

5) Maybe Larry, who's might not be well versed in all the CD slang, used the incorrect slang?
 
Killtown said:
More like this:

Silverstein was involved in an evil plot. Therefore...
Silverstein was keen to cover up the plot. Therefore...
Silverstein was asked to do an interview where he would have to reassert his lies. Therefore...
Silverstein would have felt under pressure. Therefore...
Silverstein accidentally slipped up. Therefore...
Silverstein's comments reveal an evil plot. Therefore...
Silverstein was involved in an evil plot.
Click to expand...

You actually don't know the logical fallacy you're committing, do you.

It seems to me that there are two kinds of 9/11 CTers- those who don't have enough facts to understand what happened (like the innocent people who watched Loose Change and didn't know about the hundreds of factual errors), and those who don't have enough brains to understand what happened (like the people who go on the JREF forum to make mistakes in basic logic, physics, and chemistry).

Killtown, could you do us a favor and think just a little bit harder?
 
Josh Redstone said:
It's funny how you don't provide any evidence that you infact didn't lie seven times, in order to vindicate yourself. It makes me wonder if you really care about whether you're wrong or not. I personally believe you don't care and you are just here because this is fun for you.
Click to expand...
Why should I disprove his accusations? Shouldn't he prove his?
 
Killtown said:
I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt that you are smart enough to know what I was asking was a coincidence or not.
Click to expand...

No please don't give me the benefit of the doubt on anything.

Instead you could have just clarified your original question about the 'coincidence'
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom