You are correct. We cannot reach what we do not strive for. Perhaps I might have said we cannot reach what we are not conscious of, can imagine, and desire.
*Picks up coffee cup without apparent effort. Changes thread.*
You are correct. We cannot reach what we do not strive for. Perhaps I might have said we cannot reach what we are not conscious of, can imagine, and desire.
I know he was considered a top-notch theoretical physicists and I know he was a great populariser of science but was he an expert on teaching and education?
That is not to say I disagree with his opinion but to bring him up in this context would appear to be a false appeal to authority?
coberst said:I think we have placed scholarship on a too lofty pedestal and in doing so we have placed it beyond reach or consideration.
Parents, students, corporations, and faculty recognize that the primary purpose of a education is to prepare the young person to fit neatly into the industrial machine without friction.
The “development of general ability for independent thinking and judgment” must come after our school days are complete. If we do not begin this process of preparation for independent thinking quickly after schooling it is quite likely we will never acquire the judgment required of an independent critical thinker.
At what point in the self-actualisation process does one learn that repeating an assertion is the correct response to a counter-argument? I can't wait to get there myself.Parents, students, corporations, and faculty recognize that the primary purpose of a education is to prepare the young person to fit neatly into the industrial machine without friction.
Do you have any evidence for this claim? I consider community colleges, continuing adult-education classes, and a plethora of educational and semi-educational cable television channels to be ample evidence that scholarship is neither beyond reach nor consideration. I would also add the wide availbility of the internet and all its tools for research and inquiry has made scholarship available to virtually everyone. At the downtown branch of my local library I see homeless people using the internet.
Do you have any evidence for this assertion? If it were true, I suspect that high schools would spend less time teaching students geometry and more time teaching them how to make change (a skill sorely lacking in a measureable percentage of the American workforce).
"The development must come after our school days are complete"?! I find this claim to be the most outlandish one of all. Do tell, Coberst, why this development cannot take place during one's school days.
School days are designed to prepare a student for the work place not to become an independent thinker.
School days are designed to prepare a student for the work place not to become an independent thinker.
What is your evidence for this?
Observation and judgment—these are the tools that one must rely on when schooling is over.
We must be prepared to make judgments about everything. Ultimately we cannot rely on authority for making our judgments. We must learn to observe and to make good judgments. That is the reason that learning CT is so important. This domain of knowledge will prepare the young person to constantly improve their ability to make judgments.
Hi, coberst. For your next trick, can you demonstrate how your chosen method of becoming an independent thinker has enabled you to bolster your assertions with reasoned argument, supported by evidence?School days are designed to prepare a student for the work place not to become an independent thinker.
School days are designed to prepare a student for the work place not to become an independent thinker.
Observation and judgment—these are the tools that one must rely on when schooling is over.
We must be prepared to make judgments about everything. Ultimately we cannot rely on authority for making our judgments. We must learn to observe and to make good judgments. That is the reason that learning CT is so important. This domain of knowledge will prepare the young person to constantly improve their ability to make judgments.
School days are designed to prepare a student for the work place not to become an independent thinker.
That does not answer my question i.e.
What is your evidence for your claim that:
School days are designed to prepare a student for the work place not to become an independent thinker.
All this talk about understanding and, yet, you do not seem to understand this simple question.As I said before you depend upon observation and judgment. The quality of your judgments will determine the quality of your life to a large extent.
As I said before you depend upon observation and judgment. The quality of your judgments will determine the quality of your life to a large extent.
School days are designed to prepare a student for the work place not to become an independent thinker.
I know this one!All this talk about understanding and, yet, you do not seem to understand this simple question.
What evidence do you have that shows schools only prepare students for the work place?
Oooo, this one, too!Or
What evidence do you have that shows schools do not prepare students to become independent thinkers?