Is there anything skeptics can't reduce

Yes, it does.

I just don't love my enemies.

Matthew 5:44
"But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;"

You're going to hell... you're going to hell... you're going to hell...

Yup. Got enough for me, but not enough for you.

Zero evidence is enough for you ??? :eek:

War? Not me. Just nastiness (as you describe it).

Aw, isn't that cute.
 
It always amuses me when christians don't actually follow the teachings of Christ.
It is very hard to do, considering that some of them are contradictory with others. There are many Christian sects. They don't agree on the teachings of Christ. That's why in any discussion of beliefs it is important to establish in detail what the beliefs of each person are. Saying "I believe the bible" is not enough. You have to say which parts.
 
It is very hard to do, considering that some of them are contradictory with others. There are many Christian sects. They don't agree on the teachings of Christ. That's why in any discussion of beliefs it is important to establish in detail what the beliefs of each person are. Saying "I believe the bible" is not enough. You have to say which parts.

What is a christian to do eh? Does he believe Paul when he says that scripture is the infallible word of God, and therefore he should destroy his enemies, or does he believe Matthew who reckoned that Jesus was all about the love?
 
What is a christian to do eh? Does he believe Paul when he says that scripture is the infallible word of God, and therefore he should destroy his enemies, or does he believe Matthew who reckoned that Jesus was all about the love?
Depends on whether or not he has superior firepower.
 
What is a christian to do eh? Does he believe Paul when he says that scripture is the infallible word of God, and therefore he should destroy his enemies, or does he believe Matthew who reckoned that Jesus was all about the love?

There is an appointed time for everything, and a time for every affair under the heavens.
A time to be born, and a time to die; a time to plant, and a time to uproot the plant.
A time to kill, and a time to heal; a time to tear down, and a time to build.
A time to weep, and a time to laugh; a time to mourn, and a time to dance.
A time to scatter stones, and a time to gather them; a time to embrace, and a time to be far from embraces.
A time to seek, and a time to lose; a time to keep, and a time to cast away.
A time to rend, and a time to sew; a time to be silent, and a time to speak.
A time to love, and a time to hate; a time of war, and a time of peace.....

Ecclesiastes, 3:1-8
 
Ecclesiastes, 3:1-8
There is an appointed time for everything, and a time for every affair under the heavens.
A time to be born, and a time to die; a time to plant, and a time to uproot the plant.
A time to kill, and a time to heal; a time to tear down, and a time to build.
A time to weep, and a time to laugh; a time to mourn, and a time to dance.
A time to scatter stones, and a time to gather them; a time to embrace, and a time to be far from embraces.
A time to seek, and a time to lose; a time to keep, and a time to cast away.
A time to rend, and a time to sew; a time to be silent, and a time to speak.
A time to love, and a time to hate; a time of war, and a time of peace.....
Yeah, that's true. Problem is knowing which times are which. In this, the bible is more than a little bit fuzzy. Of course there's something to be said for a religion that can assure you that whatever your moral beliefs are, God is in favor of them.
 
Apparently so.

That's what you're doing now, isn't it?

Sure, but I don't claim base my moral beliefs on scripture, and then go on to reinterpret them to fit my fancy. Do you see the hypocricy? Either the bible is a meaningful guidebook to morality, and can actually teach us something, or we can just use it to prop up our prior beliefs.
It can't be infinitely maleable and still be a useful foundation for beliefs.
 
Originally Posted by Huntster :
Apparently so.

That's what you're doing now, isn't it?
Sure, but I don't claim base my moral beliefs on scripture, and then go on to reinterpret them to fit my fancy. Do you see the hypocricy?.......

Kinda, sorta.

Often it's not "reinterpreting" that is occurring. One person, in a particular frame of mind, quotes one verse that justifies his act/emotion/outlook.

Another person, in a different frame of mind, quotes a verse that is diametrically opposed to the verse quoted by the first person.

Different outlooks at different times to different folks.

"For all things, there is a season," and seasons may be different for different people.

...Either the bible is a meaningful guidebook to morality, and can actually teach us something, or we can just use it to prop up our prior beliefs....

It is both.

It can also be completely ignored.

It can also be directly opposed as "meaningless", or "drivel".

It all depends on the person considering it.

...It can't be infinitely maleable and still be a useful foundation for beliefs...

Why not?

Hasn't that already occurred?
 
Last edited:
Prove we know anything.
I know that "I" exist. This is the basis for everything that I know.

Circular. You assume there is a programmer, then argue that because we can know things, there must be a programmer.
Perhaps I do. But that's not what I'm saying here. I'm saying how is it possible to know ... whether we're living in The Matrix or not?
 
Last edited:
I know that "I" exist. This is the basis for everything that I know.

No, you don't. You believe you exist. This is a different thing. Even if we grant you this point, you still cannot use it to be certain of any other knowledge.

Perhaps I do. But that's not what I'm saying here. I'm saying how is it possible to know ... whether we're living in The Matrix or not?

It's not. What's your point?
 
Often it's not "reinterpreting" that is occurring. One person, in a particular frame of mind, quotes one verse that justifies his act/emotion/outlook.

Another person, in a different frame of mind, quotes a verse that is diametrically opposed to the verse quoted by the first person.

Different outlooks at different times to different folks.

Sure.

How do you determine which is which ?
 
Ecclesiastes, isn't that one of the books that tells us there is no afterlife?
 

Back
Top Bottom