• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Merged Artificial Intelligence

The executive order only requires the American Government to use the new term. Individuals aren't bound by it.
The executive order states: It is therefore the policy of my Administration that, to the maximum extent permitted by law, the executive branch shall use the terms “Super Intelligence” and “SI” in place of “Artificial Intelligence” and “AI” and will not acknowledge the usage of “Artificial Intelligence” and “AI” in any applicable setting.

So individuals referring to AI when communicating with the government will probably get a response stating, “AI? What’s that?”
 
This is all irrelevant. At every level the code is designed to be deterministic. If it isn't then it's buggy - especially if it does wildly unexpected things.
Technically that hasn't been true since 1946, when the first pseudo-random number generator (middle-square method) was invented. I mean, even in the earliest computers, Alan Turing had built arguably the first true random number generator based on counting electrical white noise.

But anyway, while LLMs do use random numbers to determine acceptable substitutes for a word, it doesn't change the fact that it does exactly what it is designed to do. A speech to text program, even one based on AI (such as the AWS or Google ones,) doesn't autonomously decide to send malformed URLs and headers to hack a site. Or if you just ask ChatGPT a question, even a hacking one, it doesn't just autonomously decide to send it to some site instead of giving you an answer. If it had the capability to send malformed HTTP packets to a site that hacked it, then it was given that capability by its programmers.

And knowing that it can do that, someone failed to isolate it from the outside world.
 
It is a marvellous place.
(based on an admittedly brief visit earlier this year)
Went through the area with a considerable naval force "a few years ago". Never made the news in the US insofar as I know. We kept the peace with strong promises of violence. Nothing more peaceful than a man with a MK. 48 torpedo up his butt.
 
Went through the area with a considerable naval force "a few years ago". Never made the news in the US insofar as I know. We kept the peace with strong promises of violence. Nothing more peaceful than a man with a MK. 48 torpedo up his butt.
Is this what you are talking about?

 
Does it specifically state "the executive branch"? That makes its applicability even more restricted.
It does, at least twice in the text. I mean, you can check the actual text, it was linked to on page 185 of the thread.

It's still dumb AF, but you don't have to bother unless you're employed by the federal government and you're doing it as part of your job, or submitting anything to a federal agency. Otherwise nobody will drag you in front of a holy inquisition for using our AI overlord's name in vain. You're not going to be stoned for saying Jehovah like in Monty Python's movie.
 
Last edited:
From bsky:
bafkreidycpbdqr64mj35dw7qrh3k5ugrtlr32ljr2o2lzazhodockgijq4
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom