Merged Artificial Intelligence

[Wudang]

The executive order only requires the American Government to use the new term. Individuals aren't bound by it.

Everything not forbidden is compulsory.

 

[Gawdzilla Sama]

Everything not forbidden is compulsory.

LOL. Show me.

 

[Skeptical Greg]

The executive order only requires the American Government to use the new term. Individuals aren't bound by it.

I feel better now.

 

[jrhowell]

The executive order only requires the American Government to use the new term. Individuals aren't bound by it.

The executive order states: It is therefore the policy of my Administration that, to the maximum extent permitted by law, the executive branch shall use the terms “Super Intelligence” and “SI” in place of “Artificial Intelligence” and “AI” and will not acknowledge the usage of “Artificial Intelligence” and “AI” in any applicable setting.

So individuals referring to AI when communicating with the government will probably get a response stating, “AI? What’s that?”

 

[Dr.Sid]

Seems like natural stupidity is not giving up.

 

[arthwollipot]

Does it specifically state "the executive branch"? That makes its applicability even more restricted.

 

[EHocking]

I'm hearing rumbles of "homework generators".

I’m hearing rumblings of a South Park America episode.

 

[Gawdzilla Sama]

I’m hearing rumblings of a South Park America episode.

Watched that once. Too much like my hillbilly cousins. Maybe try again some day.

 

[SpuriusMaximus]

This is all irrelevant. At every level the code is designed to be deterministic. If it isn't then it's buggy - especially if it does wildly unexpected things.

Technically that hasn't been true since 1946, when the first pseudo-random number generator (middle-square method) was invented. I mean, even in the earliest computers, Alan Turing had built arguably the first true random number generator based on counting electrical white noise.

But anyway, while LLMs do use random numbers to determine acceptable substitutes for a word, it doesn't change the fact that it does exactly what it is designed to do. A speech to text program, even one based on AI (such as the AWS or Google ones,) doesn't autonomously decide to send malformed URLs and headers to hack a site. Or if you just ask ChatGPT a question, even a hacking one, it doesn't just autonomously decide to send it to some site instead of giving you an answer. If it had the capability to send malformed HTTP packets to a site that hacked it, then it was given that capability by its programmers.

And knowing that it can do that, someone failed to isolate it from the outside world.

 

[Gawdzilla Sama]

Ya'll have fun, ya hear? Tierra del Fuego is looking better every day.