Define progressive; I support UHC and Higher taxes on the wealthy, but, yes, I do not beliece that the goverment should run the economy.
The ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ government DOES run the economy and the current administration is making that exceptionally clear. Have you not noticed how Trump repeatedly manipulates the stock market to line his pockets? I get what you're saying, you don't want the government to own businesses, which is fine. No one here is advocating that and whatever the "DSA manifesto" says, it's not mainstream. The things you're claiming they want will never get through because of the constitution. The GOP wants a Judeo Christian country and makes no bones about it, but the court system is getting in the way. It's the same as that. I'm not going to panic because some extremely small group of people wrote a document.
And have you read the Manifesto?
No, I don't care.
Or are you just blindly defending anything that is 'Progressive".
I'm not ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ defending anything. Show me anywhere that I've defended that manifesto. You can't because, like normal, you're just throwing out made up accusations at people that call you out on your perpetual "chicken little'ing" of the left wing and how they're going to destroy the country. There's like 10 ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ DSA candidates in the entirety of the US. Give me a break.
I suggest you go ot their webite and read it and you will understand why I am concerned.
Your suggestion is duly noted and entirely dismissed. I don't care what their document says. It means nothing to me.
The Government take over all housing? Getting rid of the Senate, the Surpemce Court, and the Presidency? And that is clearly stated.
Cool, it'll never happen because there isn't a means for it to happen. At this point it's just an extremely small faction of a large political party. I'm more focused on the administration that's currently in charge, has a majority in both the house and the senate, and is tearing this country apart. I don't have time to bitch and moan about a wish list from some random group of nobodies.
And,frankly, you are coming off as somebody with a tea party mentality;Anybody not as militant as you should be tossed out of the party.
This and your following comment is all you ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ say. It's the same recycled bull ◊◊◊◊ over, and over and over. First off, by your own words you're not in "the party". You're not a liberal, you're not a progressive, you're not a democrat. You go out of your way to tell everyone, all of the time, how "not in a party" you are to the point where it's a running joke around here.
Also, I'm militant? Do you even ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ know what the word means? You use it all the time and, in the words of Inigo, "I do not think it means what you think it means".
Ironically, whenever someone disagrees with you it results in this same old song and dance. You tell them how they're blind, how they're "militant", how they're the same as MAGA, how they are in an echo chamber and so on. See? You're projecting dudalb and you don't even see it.
And I note you get upset if ANYBODY dares to criticise the Left. You are living in an echo chamber, guy,no better then the MAGA you hate.
Upset? You don't upset me, dudalb. You entertain me. I live in an echo chamber? That's despite me contributing in multiple threads, reading all sorts of conservative media and information, and being up-to-date on the voting patterns of the US? Do you know what any of these words mean?
Just because I find your nonsensical routine around here to be nothing more than a joke doesn't mean I'm in an echo chamber.