• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor has been arrested...

Buckingham Palace will not oppose plans to remove Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor from the royal line of succession, the Guardian understands, as police confirmed a search of his former Windsor home would continue over the weekend.

Royal sources indicated on Saturday that King Charles would not stand in the way of parliament if it wanted to ensure the former prince could never ascend to the throne.

 
Apparently it also needs to be ratified by the various countries where Chucky is head of state, and then be given Royal Assent. Fair enough, but is there seriously anywhere that's likely to object, which seemed to be the suggestion? Just do the paperwork, if it actually needs to be done.
It is clearly just virtue signalling. Even worse it is virtue signalling about someone who is legally innocent. In reality he will never become King, so it is just not an issue, other than bullying.
 
Seems odd that they can strip him of his titles but that didn't also remove him from the line of succession. Guess I'm getting Stockholm Syndrome from reading the Trump thread with all his dictatorial "decrees" made in one fell swoop.
 
Yeah, but the British monarchy isn't just misanthropic. It's weird. It always has been.
You misunderstand. I meant that saying the British monarchy is weird is a misanthropic take. It denotes a reflexive hatred for humanity-as-is. It's right up there with the narcissistic, delusions-of-superiority, "these people vote".
 
You misunderstand. I meant that saying the British monarchy is weird is a misanthropic take. It denotes a reflexive hatred for humanity-as-is. It's right up there with the narcissistic, delusions-of-superiority, "these people vote".
Well, there's humans, and there's humans. Some humans are weirder than others.
 
Nope. You live among human beings. We do all kinds of things, set up all kinds of systems. You say weird, I say misanthropy.
Weird ≠ necessarily bad. It is not a value judgement, it is a recognition that a thing is unusual, strange, odd, or otherwise remarkable.

ETA: Do you not think that a system that has a hereditary monarch as head of state, who is subservient to a partially elected government, that swears allegiance to the monarch that they are, supposedly, superior to (in terms of sovereign authority) and yet has to have all their decisions signed off by, is weird?

I do, and that's the system I have lived under for my entire life. I understand that it was a compromise to avoid both another civil war, and a repeat of the absolute balls-up that was our first attempt at being a republic, but it's still weird. Really ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ weird.
 
Last edited:
I think also @theprestige is conflating the institution of the monarchy being weird and the people who comprise the monarchy being weird. I was specifically referring to the former, though in some cases the latter is also true.
 
...a system that has a hereditary monarch as head of state, who is subservient to a partially elected government, that swears allegiance to the monarch that they are, supposedly, superior to (in terms of sovereign authority) and yet has to have all their decisions signed off by, is weird?
Its called a Constitutional Monarchy, and while some might call it weird, it is far from unique. Japan, Spain, Sweden, Denmark, Norway, the Netherlands, Belgium, Andorra, Luxembourg, Monaco, Cambodia, Thailand, Malaysia, Jordan, Morocco and Bhutan all have Constitutional Monarchies that operate on a similar basis.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom