That again is a solipsistic logical fallacy. Just because something is abstract, it doesn't mean it cannot exist, as many philosophers have argued abstract ideas do exist in reality. For example, Plato and the existence of the abstract principles of justice, beauty, love and the virtues. Theologists have argued long and hard about the polar ideas of good ~vs~ evil. The Greek and Roman pantheon of gods were all perpetually battling over this in the heavens above them. We see this in biblical versions, with an incessant almighty battle taking place in the heavens, as symbolized by St. Michael ~vs~ the dragon (good ~vs~ evil: 'as above, so below' ~ the Occult; 'Thy will be done, On earth as it is in heaven' ~ the Lord's Prayer) So yes, it doesn't mean anything to say you do not believe in evil, because you can do a university course in the philosophy of virtue, which implies there must ipso facto be its opposite, for there to be . So, it could be argued that in our western civilisation we are encouraged to be virtuous, as it were, then it follows that there is a choice to be evil. So whilst most people will adhere to the nuclear family model, of love and faithfulness and hopefully, marriage until 'death us do part', others will be indulging in transgressing all that others see as virtuous and good. IF Epstein was torturing, raping and killing young children and young adults for his clients' entertainment, or even running baby farms with enforced surrogates unable to escape, then I think some might be justified in calling it 'evil'. We don't know if any of this happened - other than the word of Guiffre, Farmer and co., as it has never been tried in court nor brought to light. We now know Prince Andrew had up to 90 Lolita Express planes flown into the UK over the years. Only time can tell whether there was anything abominable about it. Demanding proof - as some are doing - when the FBI and the USA have done exactly nothing about the allegations except to cover them up is not reasonable at this stage.