Of course I have, as we all have. But it's a big difference between looking at a young woman at a beauty contest or an adult model (who both literally want very badly to be looked at) and your claim about 'young teenage girls' employed by VS, which appears entirely imaginary. VS models start around 21 and go up to 40 something (rarely).
No, no, no. That's where it started. Now we are on the Merry-Go-Round of Moving Goalposts.
Some guy built an Ayahuasa [_sp?] Church there. Clearly weirdos choose this area owing to lack of perceived oversight. The same reason Little St James was purchased by Epstein (presumably with Wexner's money) and Greater St James by Al bin Suleyman who emailed Epstein to say he enjoyed the 'torture video'. Even some guy who worked as staff on LSJ said he saw planeloads of very young females alighting on the island. Where are they all now? Nobody knows because the DOJ declined to investigate; Epstein was charged by Acosta on relatively lenient charges and Florida prosecutors (headed by one Pam Bondi) gave a couple of dozen accused guys a sweet deal, kept under wraps from the public.
I see your choice of sources is as good as ever.
Well no, that is why Wexner passed it on to Epstein. Wexner the straight guy and Epstein the crook. Like Epstein accessed all these women, girls and boys all by himself.
Throw in some horrific basement experiments and you got yourself a deal.
They are beauty pageant contestants and freaking lingerie models. Yes, I feel confident they both want and expect to be looked at very badly.
Oh agreed, I'm deeply suspicious of how badly they are doing things. But I can see not taking the dead women buried at Zorro credibly. The sole report of it is some anonymous random.trying to shake a local radio down for untraceable bitcoin. I wouldn't be breaking out the cadaver dogs over that, either.
But hes got this ring, I'm told. Maybe like a snazzy platinum one?
That again is a solipsistic logical fallacy. Just because something is abstract, it doesn't mean it cannot exist, as many philosophers have argued abstract ideas do exist in reality. For example, Plato and the existence of the abstract principles of justice, beauty, love and the virtues. Theologists have argued long and hard about the polar ideas of good ~vs~ evil. The Greek and Roman pantheon of gods were all perpetually battling over this in the heavens above them. We see this in biblical versions, with an incessant almighty battle taking place in the heavens, as symbolized by St. Michael ~vs~ the dragon (good ~vs~ evil: 'as above, so below' ~ the Occult; 'Thy will be done, On earth as it is in heaven' ~ the Lord's Prayer) So yes, it doesn't mean anything to say you do not believe in evil, because you can do a university course in the philosophy of virtue, which implies there must ipso facto be its opposite, for there to be . So, it could be argued that in our western civilisation we are encouraged to be virtuous, as it were, then it follows that there is a choice to be evil. So whilst most people will adhere to the nuclear family model, of love and faithfulness and hopefully, marriage until 'death us do part', others will be indulging in transgressing all that others see as virtuous and good. IF Epstein was torturing, raping and killing young children and young adults for his clients' entertainment, or even running baby farms with enforced surrogates unable to escape, then I think some might be justified in calling it 'evil'. We don't know if any of this happened - other than the word of Guiffre, Farmer and co., as it has never been tried in court nor brought to light. We now know Prince Andrew had up to 90 Lolita Express planes flown into the UK over the years. Only time can tell whether there was anything abominable about it. Demanding proof - as some are doing - when the FBI and the USA have done exactly nothing about the allegations except to cover them up is not reasonable at this stage.
Vixen, you are being asked to substantiate your somewhat strange claim that 'young teenage girls' are working as Victorias Secret models. No one actually believes this (as their target demographic is substantially older and VS wants their teenage market to aspire to look more grown-up), so could you respond with:
This case has been ongoing for years and years. You can watch 'Filthy Rich' on Netflix and read Bradley's book on the case. The claims about Wexner are hardly new. Yet Wexner says he has never been contacted by the FBI or the police at any point.
Shall I repeat the question? You seem to be responding to something else.
I'm sorry, what was that?
